The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It?

BACKGROUND: Polypropylene (PPE) mesh is commonly utilized to reconstruct catastrophic extensor mechanism disruptions in revision total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, these procedures are associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection. The purpose of the current study was to: 1) visualize and quantify the progression of bacterial biofilm growth on PPE-mesh; and 2) determine which antiseptic solutions effectively remove viable bacteria. METHODS: Knitted PPE mesh samples were cultured with either methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) for 7 days, with regular quantification of colony forming units (CFUs) and visualization using scanning electron microscopy to identify maturity. Immature (24 hour) and mature (72 hour) biofilm was treated with one of 5 commercial antiseptics for 3 minutes. A 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, a surfactant-based formulation of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), undiluted (10%) povidone-iodine, and 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine and 3% hydrogen peroxide. A 3-log reduction in CFUs compared to saline was considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: The CFU counts plateaued, indicating maturity, at 72 hours for both MSSA and E. coli. The scanning electron microscopy confirmed confluent biofilm formation after 72 hours. The 10% povidone-iodine was clinically effective against all MSSA biofilms and immature E. coli biofilms. The 10% povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide was effective in all conditions. Only 10% povidone iodine formulations produced significantly (P < .0083) reduced CFU counts against mature biofilms. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteria rapidly form biofilm on PPE mesh. Mesh contamination can be catastrophic, and clinicians should consider utilizing an antiseptic solution at the conclusion of mesh implantation. Undiluted povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide should be considered when attempting to salvage infected PPE mesh.

Association Between Fulfillment of Preoperative Expectations and Diagnosis in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery, and the fulfillment of patient expectations is a potentially powerful tool that compares preoperative expectations and perceived postoperative improvement. Prior work has validated the use of expectation fulfillment in foot and ankle surgery. However, given the wide spectrum of pathologies and treatments in foot and ankle, no study has examined the association between expectation fulfillment and specific diagnosis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of 266 patients who completed the Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Survey (FAOS) preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated using the pre- and postoperative Foot & Ankle Expectations Survey scores. An estimated mean fulfillment proportion for each diagnosis was calculated using a multivariable linear regression model, and pairwise comparisons were used to compare the FP between diagnoses. RESULTS: All diagnoses had an FP less than 1, indicating partially fulfilled expectations. Ankle arthritis had the highest FP (0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.08), whereas neuromas and mid/hindfoot diagnoses had the lowest FPs (0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.68; 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). Higher preoperative expectations were correlated with lower fulfillment proportions. CONCLUSION: FP varied with diagnosis and preoperative expectations. An understanding of current expectation fulfillment among different diagnoses in foot and ankle surgery helps highlight areas for improvement in the management of expectations for presumed diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective review of prospective cohort study.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Comprehensive Simulation Curriculum for the IR/DR Integrated Residency.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Endovascular simulation is a validated training method, allowing residents to improve technical skills with interventional equipment in a risk-free environment. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility and efficacy of supplementing the IR/DR Integrated Residency training program with a dedicated 2-year endovascular simulation curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trainees participated in a 2-year curriculum that included the completion of 8 modules using a high-fidelity endovascular simulator (Mentice AB, Gothenberg, Sweden). Procedural modules included IVC filter placement, transarterial chemoembolization, trauma embolization, uterine artery embolization, prostate artery embolization, and peripheral arterial disease interventions. Each quarter, two trainees were filmed while completing an assigned module. Sessions led by IR faculty were held with film footage review and didactics on the assigned topic. Pre- and postcase surveys were collected to evaluate trainee comfort and confidence and assess the validity of the simulation. At the conclusion of the 2-year period, a postcurriculum survey was sent to all trainees to determine how residents viewed the utility of the simulation sessions. RESULTS: Eight residents participated in the pre- and postcase surveys. The simulation curriculum significantly increased trainee confidence for these 8 residents. A separate postcurriculum survey was completed by all 16 IR/DR residents. All 16 residents felt that simulation was a helpful addition to their education. A total of 87.5% of all residents felt that the sessions improved their confidence in the IR procedure room. A total of 75% of all residents believe that the simulation curriculum should be incorporated into the IR residency program. CONCLUSION: Adoption of a 2-year simulation curriculum can be considered for existing IR/DR training programs with access to high-fidelity endovascular simulators using the described approach.

Limited disease progression in endocrine surgery patients with treatment delays due to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted the delivery of care and timing of elective surgical procedures. Most endocrine-related operations were considered elective and safe to postpone, providing a unique opportunity to assess clinical outcomes under protracted treatment plans. METHODS: American Association of Endocrine Surgeon members were surveyed for participation. A Research Electronic Data Capture survey was developed and distributed to 27 institutions to assess the impact of COVID-19-related delays. The information collected included patient demographics, primary diagnosis, resumption of care, and assessment of disease progression by the surgeon. RESULTS: Twelve out of 27 institutions completed the survey (44.4%). Of 850 patients, 74.8% (636) were female; median age was 56 (interquartile range, 44-66) years. Forty percent (34) of patients had not been seen since their original surgical appointment was delayed; 86.2% (733) of patients had a delay in care with women more likely to have a delay (87.6% vs 82.2% of men, χ2 = 3.84, P = .05). Median duration of delay was 70 (interquartile range, 42-118) days. Among patients with a delay in care, primary disease site included thyroid (54.2%), parathyroid (37.2%), adrenal (6.5%), and pancreatic/gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (1.3%). In addition, 4.0% (26) of patients experienced disease progression and 4.1% (24) had a change from the initial operative plan. The duration of delay was not associated with disease progression (P = .96) or a change in operative plan (P = .66). CONCLUSION: Although some patients experienced disease progression during COVID-19 delays to endocrine disease-related care, most patients with follow-up did not. Our analysis indicated that temporary delay may be an acceptable course of action in extreme circumstances for most endocrine-related surgical disease.