Sperm nuclei analysis of 1/29 Robertsonian translocation carrier bulls using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

In 1964, Gustavsson and Rockborn first described the 1/29 Robertsonian translocation in cattle. Since then, several studies have demonstrated the negative effect of this particular chromosomal rearrangement on the fertility of carrier animals. During the last decade, meiotic segregation patterns have been studied on human males carrying balanced translocations using FISH on decondensed sperm nuclei. In this work, we have applied the 'Sperm-FISH' technique to determine the chromosomal content of spermatozoa from two bulls heterozygous for the 1/29 translocation and one normal bull (control). 5425 and 2702 sperm nuclei were scored, respectively, for the two heterozygous bulls, using whole chromosome painting probes of chromosomes 1 and 29. Very similar proportions of normal (or balanced) spermatozoa resulting from alternate segregation were observed (97.42% and 96.78%). For both heterozygous bulls, the proportions of nullisomic and disomic spermatozoa did not follow the theoretical 1:1 ratio. Indeed, proportions of nullisomic spermatozoa were higher than those of disomic sperma tozoa (1.40% vs 0.09% (bull 1) and 1.29% vs 0.15% (bull 2) for BTA1, and 0.65% vs 0.40% (bull 1) and 1.11% vs 0.63% (bull 2) for BTA29). The average frequencies of disomic and diploid spermatozoa in the normal bull were 0.11% and 0.05%, respectively.

Influence of the type of energy supply on lh secretion, follicular growth and response to estrus synchronization treatment in feed-restricted suckler beef cows.

The present experiment aimed to compare the efficiency of supplementation (+17.5 MJ Net Energy/d starting 47 +/- 4 days after calving) with concentrate (CS, maize grain, n = 10) or with forage (FS, maize silage, n = 10) in estrus-synchronized (Norgestomet implant 10 days inserted 60 +/- 4 days postpartum + PMSG at implant removal) beef cows previously restricted (47 MJ Net Energy/d, 785 g CP/d, 70% of requirements). The type of diet had no significant effect on basal LH concentrations (CS: 0.18 +/- 0.12 vs FS: 0.11+/- 0.02 ng/mL), LH pulse frequency (CS : 0.7 +/- 0.3 vs FS: 0.8 +/- 0.2 pulse/10 h), LH pulse amplitude (CS: 0.55 +/- 0.50 vs FS : 0.62 +/- 0.50 ng/mL) or estradiol (E2) concentrations (CS: 3.3 +/- 0.8 vs FS: 4.6+ /- 0.8 pg/mL) 13 days after the beginning of energy supplementation. No differences between CS and FS cows were observed for the number of small, medium and large follicles nor on the size of the largest follicle from 11 days before implant insertion to implant removal (IR). After IR, an LH surge was observed in 2 of the CS and 4 of the FS cows. The type of energy supplementation had no significant effect on LH (CS: 0.16 +/- 0.06 ng/mL vs FS 0.48 +/- 0.06 ng/mL; P > 0.05) or on estradiol concentrations (CS : 7.8 +/- 0.2 vs FS : 8.9 +/- 0.2 pg/mL, P > 0.10) measured hourly from 29 to 49 h after IR. Cows that ovulated after IR tended to have higher E2 concentrations than cows that did not ovulate (9.4 +/- 0.2 vs 6.3 +/- 0.2 pg/mL, P = 0.08). Similar ovulation and pregnancy rates were observed in CS and FS cows (CS: 6/10 vs FS: 7/10 and CS: 6/10 vs FS: 5/10 respectively, P > 0.05). To conclude, energy supplementation with forage was as effective as energy supplementation with concentrate to influence follicular growth, ovulation and pregnancy percentage after estrus synchronization treatment in diet-restricted beef cows.

Influence of flushing on LH secretion, follicular growth and the response to estrus synchronization treatment in suckled beef cows.

The effects of energy supplementation (flushing) on LH and estradiol secretion, follicular growth and the response to estrus synchronization treatment (Norgestomet + PMSG initiated 41.9 +/- 3.4 d after calving) were investigated in 16 suckled beef cows fed either 70% (Group C, n = 8) of energy requirements from calving to 3 wk after AI or fed the same restricted diet until 11 d before synchronization and then were supplemented with 2 kg concentrate until 3 wk after AI (Group S, n = 8). Concentrations of LH and estradiol 17 beta were measured from 3 sampling periods: 25 and 39 d after calving and between 29 and 49 h after implant removal. Ovaries were examined by ultrasonography 11 d before treatment to implant withdrawal (IR). The effects of energy level, day (or hour) of observation and corresponding interactions were tested on repeated measurements by split-plot ANOVA. No positive effect of flushing was observed on characteristics of LH secretion on Day 39. However, the size of the largest follicle and the number of large follicles were higher in Group S than in Group C cows, respectively, 7 and 9 d after the beginning of flushing to 2 d after the start of treatment. After IR, the estradiol secretion tended to be higher in Group S than in Group C cows (9.8 +/- 0.4 pg/mL vs 7.2 +/- 0.2 pg/mL; P = 0.06), but no effect on LH secretion was observed. After implant removal 12 cows ovulated (Group S: 7/8 vs Group C: 5/8; P > 0.05), 7 were pregnant at 21 d after AI (Group S: 6/8 vs Group C: 1/8; P < 0.05) and 4 at 45 d after AI (Group S: 4/8 vs Group C 0/8; P > 0.05). To conclude, flushing had a positive effect on follicular growth, which does not seem to be mediated by LH. In cows fed a restricted diet, flushing enhanced follicular growth, increased the fertilization rate and/or reduced early embryonic death.

Sources of variation of post-partum cyclicity, ovulation and pregnancy rates in primiparous Charolais cows treated with norgestomet implants and PMSG.

In this study, sources of variation of postpartum cyclicity, ovulation and pregnancy rates were analyzed for 723 primiparous suckled Charolais cows treated with combined norgestomet implants (Crestar) and 600 IU PMSG (Chronogest) injected at the time of implant removal. The cows were inseminated 48 and 72 h after implant removal. Cyclicity and ovulation rate were estimated by progesterone assay and pregnancy rate by ultrasonography. At time of implant insertion, difficulty of previous calving, body condition score (BCS, from 1 to 5), interval from calving to implant insertion and herd related factors were recorded and their effects analyzed by logistic regression models. Cyclicity, ovulation and pregnancy rates were, respectively, 14.7% (106/723 ), 67.1% (381/568 ) and 42% (303/722 ) and were affected by BCS, calving conditions and interval from calving to implant insertion (P values from < 0.01 to < 0.0001). For ovulation and pregnancy rate, an interaction between BCS and interval from calving to implant insertion was found (P < 0.01). No other main factor or interaction was found to be significant. Cyclicity rate was lower in BCS1 (score < 2.5) cows (9.6%) than in BCS2 (19.8%) or BCS3 (score > 2.5) cows (22.4%), and decreased as difficulty of calving increased (23.2, 13.6 and 10.1%, respectively, for calving conditions 1, 2 and 3 cows). Cyclicity rate increased with interval from calving to implant insertion (8.2, 10.2 and 19.5%, respectively, for interval from calving to implant insertion < 60 d, between 60 and 70 d and > 70 d). Similar trends were found for ovulation rate. Previous difficult calving conditions influenced pregnancy rate negatively (47.9, 43.8 and 32.5% for calving conditions 1, 2 and 3 cows, respectively; P < 0,005).