Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 96: 107741, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989970

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy is one of the main cancer treatment modalities applied in 50-70% of cancer patients. Despite the many advantages of this treatment, such as non-invasiveness, organ-preservation, and spatiotemporal flexibility in tumor targeting, it can lead to complications in irradiated healthy cells/tissues. In this regard, the use of radio-protective agents can alleviate radiation-induced complications. This study aimed to review the potential role of alpha-lipoic acid in the prevention/reduction of radiation-induced toxicities on healthy cells/tissues. METHODS: A systematic search was performed following PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant literature on the "role of alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of radiotherapy-induced toxicity" in the electronic databases of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus up to January 2021. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the present study, 278 articles were screened. Finally, 29 articles were included in this systematic review. RESULTS: The obtained results showed that in experimental in vivo models, the radiation-treated groups had decreased survival rate and body weight compared to the control groups. It was also found that radiation can induce mild to severe toxicities on gastrointestinal, circulatory, reproductive, central nervous, respiratory, endocrine, exocrine systems, etc. However, the use of alpha-lipoic acid could alleviate the radiation-induced toxicities in most cases. This radio-protective agent exerts its effects through mechanisms of anti-oxidant, anti-apoptosis, anti-inflammatory, and so on. CONCLUSION: According to the obtained results, it can be mentioned that co-treatment of alpha-lipoic acid with radiotherapy ameliorates the radiation-induced toxicities in healthy cells/tissues.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/drug therapy , Radiation-Protective Agents/pharmacology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Thioctic Acid/pharmacology , Animals , Humans , Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control
2.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 205: 106089, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33862569

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to calculate and compare absorbed dose to bone following exposure to 192Ir and 60Co sources in high dose rate (HDR) skin brachytherapy. Moreover, effects of the bone thickness and soft tissue thickness before the bone on absorbed dose to the bone are evaluated . MATERIALS AND METHODS: 192Ir and 60Co sources inserted in Leipzig applicators with internal diameters of 1, 2 and 3 cm with/without their optimal flattening filters were simulated by MCNPX Monte Carlo code. Then, heterogeneous phantoms (including skin, soft tissue before and after the bone, cortical bone and bone marrow) were defined. Finally, relative depth dose values for the bone and other tissues in the heterogeneous phantoms were obtained and compared. RESULTS: The average relative depth dose values of the skin, soft tissue before and after bone and bone marrow were almost similar for both 192Ir and 60Co sources, with a maximum difference less than 2%. However, a 0.1-6.8% difference was observed between average relative depth dose values of these two sources for the cortical bone. The results showed that with increasing the bone thickness and bone distance from the skin surface, the average relative depth dose values of the bone marrow and cortical bone decreased for both 192Ir and 60Co sources inserted in the applicators without/with their optimal flattening filters. For most of evaluated the applicators without/with their flattening filters, the average relative depth dose values of the bone marrow arisen from the 60Co source were higher than those obtained from the 192Ir source, while an opposite trend was observed for the cortical bone . CONCLUSION: The obtained findings showed that the average relative depth dose values of 192Ir and 60Co sources at the corresponding depths of the designed heterogeneous phantoms were almost similar (expect for the cortical bone). Hence, it is concluded that 60Co source can be used instead of 192Ir source in HDR skin brachytherapy, particularly in developing countries.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Skin Neoplasms , Bone and Bones , Humans , Iridium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...