Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 33(4): 1223-1230, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35543884

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Consensus is lacking regarding management of posttraumatic infected diaphyseal nonunions of femur following intramedullary nailing. Present study reports outcomes of single stage standardised treatment protocol using monolateral rail external fixator/limb reconstruction system in this type of infected diaphyseal femoral nonunions. METHODS: This retrospective study included 26 patients with mean age of 31.7 years having posttraumatic infected diaphyseal femoral nonunions following intramedullary nailing and managed with radical debridement and monolateral rail fixator. The results were assessed by Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov criteria. RESULTS: Mean intraoperative bone gap was 4.34 (range, 2-7) cm. Mean gain in bone length was 4.04 (range, 0-7) cm. Fracture united primarily in 22 cases and after freshening of edges, fixator adjustment and fibular grafting in three more patients. Infection persisted in one patient. Most common complications were superficial pin tract infection (15 patients) and loss of more than 30° knee flexion (13 patients). The bone results were excellent, good, and poor in 15, 9, and 2 patients, respectively. The functional results were excellent, good, fair, and poor in 11,13,1 and 1 patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: Single stage procedure including radical debridement, acute docking, distraction osteogenesis at corticotomy site and stabilization with monolateral rail fixator reliably achieves good to excellent bone and functional results, union and eradication of infection in majority of infected nonunions of femoral diaphysis developing after intramedullary fixation. We recommend acute docking in bone gap ≤ 5 cm.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Ununited , Osteogenesis, Distraction , Humans , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Diaphyses , Femur/surgery , Osteogenesis, Distraction/methods , External Fixators , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fractures, Ununited/etiology , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Injury ; 53(10): 3464-3470, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36008173

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Management of open fractures of tibia is still a matter of debate due to high incidence of infections. Traditionally external fixators have been advocated in managing open tibial fractures. Due to limited efficacy of systemic antibiotics, recently antibiotic coated intramedullary interlocking nails have been developed for the management of open tibia fractures. Therefore, we conducted this prospective randomized study to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of primary ring fixator versus antibiotic coated nail in open diaphyseal tibial fractures. METHODS: The study included 32 patients with Gustilo-Anderson type II and type IIIA fractures of tibial diaphysis. Out of them 16 patients were managed with Ring External Fixator (Group I) and 16 were managed with OssiproÒ gentamicin intramedullary interlocking tibial nail (Group II). The radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at final follow-up according to and SMFA criteria. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using IBM SPSS statistics 2.0 software. Chi square test and independent student t-test were used and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant RESULTS: Union was achieved in 15 patients (93.8%) in group I and 13 patients (81.2%) in group II. Pin tract infection was seen in 6 patients (37.5%) in group I, whereas infection was present in 2 patients (12.5%) in group II. Bone results were excellent in 13 patients (81.3%), good in 2 patients (12.5%), poor in one patient (6.3%). In group II, bone results were excellent in 12 patients (75%), good in one patient (6.2%), poor in 3 patients (18.8%). At 1 year of final follow up, mean SMFA score was 24.41±5.87 in group I, whereas mean SMFA score was 23.703±8.02 in group II. CONCLUSION: Ring fixator as well as antibiotic coated tibial interlocking nail achieved comparable rates of union in the present study. Complication rates were similar in both the groups and the functional and radiological outcomes were comparable in both groups. Results of this study indicate that although ring fixation is an established option for management of open tibial fractures, antibiotic-coated intramedullary nail is also a reliable option in open Grade II and grade IIIA injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Open , Tibial Fractures , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Nails , Diaphyses/diagnostic imaging , Diaphyses/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Open/complications , Fractures, Open/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Open/surgery , Gentamicins , Humans , Prospective Studies , Tibia , Tibial Fractures/complications , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...