Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Emerg Manag ; 21(4): 355-368, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disasters pose various challenges to hospitals' functioning during calamities. Resilient health system is the need of the hour. To work as a safe hospital even during disasters, it is important to sensitize, orient, and train doctors and other medical professionals towards disaster preparedness. This study was conducted to study the knowledge, attitudes, and practices about disaster preparedness among resident doctors. METHODOLOGY: It was a cross-sectional study conducted amongst 363 resident doctors of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Delhi, India. A pretested self-administered semistructured questionnaire was used to gather information. Analysis was done using the SPSS version 21.0 and employing descriptive -statistics. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 28.1 ± 2.8 years. Ninety-four (25.9 percent) study participants were found to have good/excellent knowledge about disaster preparedness, only 16.5 percent (60) had good awareness about the hospital's disaster preparedness, and 306 (84.3 percent) study participants had a favorable attitude towards disaster preparedness. Age and educational qualification were found to be significantly associated with knowledge about disaster preparedness. Only 11.6 percent (42) resident doctors attended any mock drill for disaster preparedness in the past 1 year and less than one-fifth (68, 18.7 percent) received training in disaster preparedness. CONCLUSION: A majority of study participants had a favorable attitude in spite of inadequate knowledge and aware-ness about disaster preparedness. There is a need to address this mismatch between knowledge and attitude through regular sensitization and retrainings along with frequent practical drills and simulation exercise.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Disasters , Humans , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Tertiary Healthcare , Surveys and Questionnaires , India , Hospitals, Teaching
2.
Indian J Community Med ; 45(3): 283-286, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354002

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The most severe health threats dominating the low- and middle-income countries are no longer the dreaded communicable diseases; but, they are everyday diseases due to changes in lifestyle, which are the noncommunicable diseases. Quality of life (QOL) is defined by the World Health Organization as an individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns. QOL assessment in health system is a multidimensional construct that can be measured by evaluating objective levels of health status filtered by the subjective perceptions and expectations of the individual. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the QOL among diabetics attending the endocrine outpatient department (OPD) in a tertiary care hospital of Haryana. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at endocrinology OPD of Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana from May 2014 to April 2015. Five hundred diabetics (Type 1 and 2) were recruited for the study. Patients registered on the day of interview were selected using systematic random sampling. A predesigned, pretested, semi-structured schedule which included sociodemographic variables of the study participants along with information about family history of diabetes was filled by interviewing the study subjects in their vernacular language individually. Generic instrument, SF-36 v2 was used to assess the QOL. RESULTS: The mean age of the study participants was 50.41 ± 9.1 years. The mean disease duration was 6.12 ± 5.55 years. Majority of our respondents belonged to Hindu religion (97.4%). The mean scores for the bodily pain domain (79.52 ± 28.15) and social functioning domain (76.47 ± 26.10) of QOL were the highest. CONCLUSION: The mean scores for the bodily pain domain and social functioning domain of QOL were the highest. Assess the QOL in patients with diabetes by measuring the multiple domains involving physical, psychological and social aspects.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...