ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Strategies to assess patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using a point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay may expedite emergency care. A 2-h POC hs-cTnI strategy for emergency patients with suspected AMI was derived and validated. METHODS: In two international, multi-centre, prospective, observational studies of adult emergency patients (1486 derivation cohort and 1796 validation cohort) with suspected AMI, hs-cTnI (Siemens Atellica® VTLi) was measured at admission and 2â h later. Adjudicated final diagnoses utilized the hs-cTn assay in clinical use. A risk stratification algorithm was derived and validated. The primary diagnostic outcome was index AMI (Types 1 and 2). The primary safety outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac events incorporating AMI and cardiac death. RESULTS: Overall, 81 (5.5%) and 88 (4.9%) patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively, had AMI. The 2-h algorithm defined 66.1% as low risk with a sensitivity of 98.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 89.3%-99.9%] and a negative predictive value of 99.9 (95% CI 99.2%-100%) for index AMI in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, 53.3% were low risk with a sensitivity of 98.9% (95% CI 92.4%-99.8%) and a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.3%-100%) for index AMI. The high-risk metrics identified 5.4% of patients with a specificity of 98.5% (95% CI 96.6%-99.4%) and a positive predictive value of 74.5% (95% CI 62.7%-83.6%) for index AMI. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-h algorithm using a POC hs-cTnI concentration enables safe and efficient risk assessment of patients with suspected AMI. The short turnaround time of POC testing may support significant efficiencies in the management of the large proportion of emergency patients with suspected AMI.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Spot urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is advocated in guidelines to assess diuretic response and titrate dosage in acute heart failure (AHF). However, no randomised controlled trial data exists to support this approach. We performed a prospective pilot trial to investigate the feasibility of this approach. METHODS: 60 patients with AHF (n = 30 in each arm) were randomly assigned to titration of loop diuretics for the first 48 hours of admission according to UNa levels (intervention arm) or based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion (standard care arm). Diuretic insufficiency was defined as UNa < 50 mmol/L. Endpoints relating to diuretic efficacy, safety and AHF outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: UNa-guided therapy patients experienced less acute kidney injury (20% vs 50%, p = 0.01) and a tendency towards less hypokalaemia (serum K+<3.5 mmol, 7% vs 27%, p = 0.04), with greater weight loss (3.3 kg vs 2.1 kg, p = 0.01). They reported a greater reduction in the clinical congestion score (-4.7 vs -2.6, p < 0.01) and were more likely to report marked symptom improvement (40% vs 13.3%, p = 0.04) at 48 hours. There was no difference in the length of hospital stay (median LOS: 8 days in both groups, p = 0.98), 30-day mortality or readmission rate. CONCLUSION: UNa-guided titration of diuretic therapy in AHF is feasible and safer than titration based on clinical signs and symptoms of congestion, with more effective decongestion at 48 hours. Further large-scale trials are needed to determine if the superiority of this approach translates into improved patient outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to validate the clinical performance of a rapid assessment pathway incorporating the Siemens Atellica IM high sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This was a multicentre prospective observational study of adult ED patients presenting to five Australian hospitals between November 2020 and September 2021. Participants included those with symptoms of suspected AMI (without ST-segment elevation MI on presentation ECG). The Siemen's Atellica IM hs-cTnI laboratory-based assay was used to measure troponin concentrations at admission and after 2-3 hours and cardiologists adjudicated final diagnoses. The HighSTEACS diagnostic algorithm was evaluated, incorporating hs-cTnI concentrations at presentation and absolute changes within the first 2 to 3 hours. The primary outcome was index AMI, including type 1 or 2 non-ST segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or ST-elevation MI (STEMI) following presentation. 30-day major adverse cardiac outcomes (including AMI, urgent revascularisation or cardiac death) were also reported. The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. RESULTS: 1994 patients were included. The average age was 56.2 years (SD=15.6), and 44.9% were women. 118 (5.9%) patients had confirmed index AMI. The 2-hour algorithm defined 61.3% of patients as low risk. Sensitivity was 99.1% (94.0%-99.9%) and negative predictive value was 99.9% (99.3%-100%). 24.4% of patients were deemed intermediate risk. When applying the parameters for high risk, 252 (14.3%) were identified, with a specificity of 91.5% (88.7%-93.6%) and a PPV of 42.0% (35.6-48.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A 2-hour algorithm based on the HighSTEACS strategy using the Siemens Atellica IM hs-cTnI laboratory-based assay enables safe and efficient risk assessment of emergency patients with suspected AMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000053820.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Urinary sodium concentration (UNa) is a simple test advocated to assess diuretics efficacy and predict outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association of UNa with outcomes of AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Embase and Medline for eligible studies that reported the association between UNa and outcomes of urinary output, weight loss, worsening renal function, length of hospital stay, re-hospitalization, worsening heart failure, and all-cause mortality in AHF. Nineteen observational studies out of 1592 screened records were included. For meta-analyses of outcomes, we grouped patients into high vs. low UNa, with most studies defining high UNa as >48-65 mmol/L. In the high UNa group, pooled data showed a higher urinary output (mean difference 502 mL, 95% CI 323-681, P < 0.01), greater weight loss (mean difference 1.6 kg, 95% CI 0.3-2.9, P = 0.01), and a shorter length of stay (mean difference -1.4 days, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.1, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in worsening kidney function (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.25-1.16, P = 0.1). Due to the small number of studies, we did not report pooled estimates for re-hospitalization and worsening heart failure. High UNa was associated with lower odds of 30-day (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.14-0.49, P < 0.01), 90-day (OR 0.39,95% CI 0.25-0.59, P < 0.01) and 12-month (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.20-0.61, P < 0.01) mortality. CONCLUSION: High UNa after diuretic administration is associated with higher urinary output, greater weight loss, shorter length of stay, and lower odds of death. UNa is a promising marker of diuretic efficacy in AHF which should be confirmed in randomized trials.
