Performance of F-18 Fluorocholine PET/CT for Detection of Hyperfunctioning Parathyroid Tissue in Patients with Elevated Parathyroid Hormone Levels and Negative or Discrepant Results in conventional Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorocholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue (HPT) in patients with elevated parathyroid hormone levels with negative or inconclusive conventional imaging results and to compare the findings with those obtained using technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) scintigraphy and neck ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of 105 patients with hyperparathyroidism who underwent FCH PET/CT, dual-phase MIBI parathyroid scintigraphy (median interval: 42 days), and neck US were retrospectively analyzed. The gold standard was histopathological findings for 81 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy and clinical follow-up findings in the remaining 24 patients. Sensitivities, positive predictive values (PPVs), and accuracies were calculated for all imaging modalities. RESULTS: Among the 81 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, either parathyroid adenoma (n = 64), hyperplasia (n = 9), neoplasia (n = 4), or both parathyroid adenoma and hyperplasia (n = 1) were detected, except 3 patients who did not show HPT. Of the 24 (23%) patients who were followed-up without operation, 22 (92%) showed persistent hyperparathyroidism. FCH PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity than MIBI scintigraphy and US in detection of HPT (p < 0.01). Sensitivity, PPV, and accuracy of FCH PET/CT were 94.1% (95/101), 97.9% (95/97), and 92.4% (97/105), respectively. The corresponding values for MIBI scintigraphy and US were 45.1% (46/102), 97.9% (46/47), and 45.7% (48/105) and 44.1% (45/102), 93.8% (45/48), and 42.9% (45/105), respectively. Among the 35 patients showing negative MIBI scintigraphy and neck US findings, 30 (86%) showed positive results on FCH PET/CT. FCH PET/CT could demonstrate ectopic locations of HPT in 11 patients whereas MIBI and US showed positive findings in only 6 and 3 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: FCH PET/CT is an effective imaging modality for detection of HPT with the highest sensitivity among the available imaging techniques. Therefore, FCH PET/CT can be recommended especially for patients who show negative or inconclusive results on conventional imaging.

Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients

Background/aim: The aim of our study was to compare Tc-99m MDP bone scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in terms of detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods: A total of 28 prostate cancer patients with bone scan and PSMA PET/CT performed within 90 days were retrospectively included in our analysis. All bone lesions were scored as negative (score-0), positive (score-1), or suspicious (score-2) for metastasis by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Both patient-based and region-based analyses were made for all osseous lesions. Results: On per-patient analysis; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 72.7%, 52.9%, 50%, 75%, and 60.7%, respectively, for bone scan and 90.9%, 100%, 100%, 94.4%, and 96.4%, respectively, for PSMA PET/CT. On per-region analysis; sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 76.2%, 80.9%, 57.1%, 91.1%, and 79.8%, respectively, for bone scan and 85.7%, 100%, 100%, 95.5%, and 95.4%, respectively, for PSMA PET/CT. Conclusion: Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared to bone scan in terms of bone metastasis detection in prostate cancer patients. Therefore, it might be the modality of choice for patients with suspicion for metastatic disease, despite negative bone scan and conventional imaging results