Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 58(5): 265-71, 2009 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19833318

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Perioperative management of anticoagulation in patients referred for pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator implantation isn't consensual. Our objective was to evaluate, in a large cohort, hemorrhagic complications in patients having implantation or replacement of a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, and to assess perioperative anticoagulation effect on hemorrhagic risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 461 consecutive patients having implantation or replacement of a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator has been analyzed. Thirty patients (6,5%) had oral anticoagulants (OAC) switched to heparin/low-molecular-weight heparin, while 76 (16,5%) had their oral anticoagulation disrupted habitually for 48 hours. A total of six over 30 (20%) and two over 76 (2.6%) patients in the bridge and OAC, respectively experienced a pocket hematoma (bridge vs. OAC, p<0.05), while ten over 355 (2.8%) had a pocket hematoma in the control group (bridge vs. control p=0.006). Duration of the hospital stay was longer in the bridge group in comparison with OAC and control groups (9 vs. 7 vs. 6 days, respectively, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Oral anticoagulation bridging with heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with a higher risk of pocket hematoma and a longer duration of hospitalization, in comparison with a strategy allowing a temporary disruption of OAC adapted to the thromboembolic risk.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Pacemaker, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Middle Aged , Perioperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
3.
Derm Beruf Umwelt ; 32(6): 208-11, 1984.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6241142

ABSTRACT

Observations concerning contact dermatitis to derivatives of isothiazolin-3-one are reported. A systematic review of the literature of previously published cases is reported. A verified contact dermatitis to benzisothiazolin-3-one of a laborer in a rubber factory is discussed. Another case of occupational dermatitis concerns an allergy to a commercial product, containing 2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one as a preservative and utilized by shoe factory workers. Additionally, cases of an allergy to cosmetic preparations, containing a mixture of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, are elaborated.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/chemically induced , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/chemically induced , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...