GLIM criteria has fair sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing malnutrition when using SGA as comparator.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a new framework for diagnosing malnutrition based on combinations of phenotypic and etiologic criteria. The aim of this study was to compare GLIM criteria to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) judged to be the most validated standardized assessment of malnutrition. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of variables extracted from a prospective cohort study assessing malnutrition at admission, in 18 Canadian hospitals. Based on the available parameters, GLIM was compared to SGA using the following combinations of one phenotypic and one etiologic criteria: A. weight loss and low intake; B. weight loss and high C-reactive protein (CRP); C. low body mass index (BMI) and low intake; D. low BMI, high CRP. Data were not available for fat-free mass. Since all patients had acute or chronic active disease as per GLIM etiologic criterion, CRP was used as a more specific measure to define inflammation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. Data are expressed as mean and Clopper-Pearson exact 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From 1022 patients in the original dataset, 784 had all considered parameters with a prevalence of malnutrition (SGA B or C) of 45.15% (CI 41.60, 48.70), where severe malnutrition (SGA C) was 11.73% (CI 9.57, 14.20). Using the available GLIM parameters with the above combinations of two-criteria, the prevalence of malnutrition was 33.29% (CI 30.00, 36.71) and severe malnutrition was 19.77% (CI 17.00, 22.70). For all criteria combinations of GLIM together versus SGA, sensitivity was 61.30% (CI 56.0, 66.4), specificity was 89.77% (CI 86.5, 92.5) and PPV was 83.14% (CI 78.0, 87.5) while NPV was 73.80 (CI 69.8, 77.5). Sensitivity was improved when only SGA C for severe malnutrition was used as the criterion (82.61%; CI 73.3, 89.7) but PPV was greatly reduced (29.12%; CI 23.7, 35.0). Similarly, when using GLIM criteria for severe malnutrition only, sensitivity improved (76.09%; CI 66.1, 84.4). Any two criteria combinations of GLIM had much poorer sensitivity with the highest being weight loss + high CRP (46.33%) with a specificity of 93.02% (PPV: 84.54%; NPV: 67.80%), while the combination of low BMI + low intake had the highest specificity (98.84%) but with a sensitivity of 15.54% (PPV 91.67%; NPV: 58.70%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the CMTF dataset and using SGA as the most validated tool for diagnosing malnutrition, the two criteria combinations used for GLIM in the present study had fair criterion validity for the diagnosis of malnutrition, regardless of severity status. The best combinations were weight loss and high CRP or weight loss and low intake, both having high specificity at diagnosing malnutrition but unacceptably low sensitivity, and thus were considered poor. There may be potential for the full framework to be used to diagnose malnutrition, but individual combinations of two criteria when used exclusively will miss malnourished patients, as defined by SGA.

Effect of teduglutide on restoring oral autonomy for magnesium in two patients with short bowel.

It is not known whether Teduglutide can allow patients with Short bowel syndrome, previously dependent on continuous or periodic intravenous (IV) magnesium, to attain oral autonomy with or without supplementation. Here, we report on two patients previously dependent on continuous or intermittently administered IV magnesium to achieve autonomy from IV, one with and one without oral supplementation that was previously ineffective in both patients.

Variations in practice patterns for adult cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer has become a major indication for home parenteral nutrition (HPN). However, the use of HPN in adult cancer patients is highly variable between countries and may also differ within each country. The aim of the present study was to characterize regional variations in practice patterns for cancer patients on HPN using data from the Canadian HPN Registry. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all cancer patients (n = 164) enrolled in the registry from 2005 to 2016. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were described. Differences in baseline characteristics were evaluated by province and duration of HPN therapy. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among different tumor types and provinces using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The most common tumors were gastrointestinal (54.2%) and gynecologic (31.8%). Most patients were from the provinces of Ontario (54.3%) and Alberta (41.5%). Patients who received HPN for ≥3 mo (64.6%) had a higher baseline Karnofsky Performance Status (80 versus 50) and albumin (35 versus 26 mmol/L) compared with those on HPN for <3 mo. There were no differences in survival based on tumor category. Patients in Ontario programs had a longer median survival (11.3 versus 7.1 mo) and higher proportion of secondary indications for HPN relative to patients in Alberta programs. CONCLUSIONS: Most cancer patients on HPN have gastrointestinal or gynecologic cancers. Those surviving for ≥3 mo have better baseline characteristics. Regional variability in the prevalence, selection, and survival of cancer patients receiving HPN suggests the need for consensus on the use of HPN in this population.

Malnutrition in Gastrointestinal Disorders: Detection and Nutritional Assessment.

All patients with significant gastrointestinal disease should be clinically assessed for protein calorie malnutrition by using the Subjective Global Assessment. Blood tests for anemia, electrolytes, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, ferritin, vitamin B12, and folate should be considered for assessment of major micronutrients. Where malabsorption or inflammatory bowel disease is diagnosed, bone mineral density using dual beam x-ray absorptiometry, 25-OH vitamin D levels, and measurement of other vitamins and trace elements should be considered. In addition, in at-risk patients, vitamin and trace element clinical deficiency syndromes should be considered during patient assessment.

Changes in Home Parenteral Nutrition Practice Based on the Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition Patient Registry.

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the Canadian home parenteral nutrition (HPN) registry has collected data on patients' demography, outcomes, and HPN clinical practice. At annual meetings, Canadian HPN programs review and discuss results. AIM: To evaluate changes over time in patient demography, outcomes, and HPN clinical practice using the registry data. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 369 patients who were prospectively entered in the registry. Two periods were compared for the first data entry: 2005-2008 (n = 182) and 2011-2014 (n = 187). Patient demography, indications for HPN, HPN regimen, nutrition assessment, vascular access, and number of line sepsis per 1000 catheter days were evaluated. RESULTS: For 2011-2014 compared with 2005-2008, indications for HPN changed significantly, with an increased proportion of patients with cancer (37.9% vs 16.7%) and with fewer cases of short bowel syndrome (32% vs 65.5%); line sepsis rate decreased from 1.58 to 0.97 per 1000 catheter days; and the use of tunneled catheters decreased from 64.3% to 38.0% and was no longer the most frequently chosen vascular access method. In contrast, the proportion of peripherally inserted central catheters increased from 21.6% to 52.9%. In addition, there was a reduction in number and days of hospitalizations related to HPN, and favorable changes were noted in the prescription of energy, proteins, and trace elements. CONCLUSION: The Canadian HPN registry is useful in tracking trends in demography, outcomes, and clinical practice. Results suggest a shift in patient demography and line access with improvement in line sepsis, hospitalizations, and HPN prescriptions.

Effect of Standardised Scoring Conventions on Inter-rater Reliability in the Endoscopic Evaluation of Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity [CDEIS] and Simplified Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] demonstrate consistent overall intra- and inter-rater reliability. However, the reliability of some index items is relatively poor. We evaluated scoring conventions to improve the reliability of these items. METHODS: Five gastroenterologists with no previous experience scoring the CDEIS or SES-CD were trained on their use. A total of 65 video recordings of colonoscopies were scored blindly by each gastroenterologist before and after additional training on index scoring conventions. Intra-class correlation coefficients [ICCs] assessed the effect of application of these conventions on the reliability of the CDEIS, SES-CD, and a Global Evaluation of Lesion Severity [GELS] score. RESULTS: Following training on scoring conventions, inter-rater ICCs (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the total SES-CD score increased from 0.78 [0.71, 0.85] to 0.85 [0.79, 0.89]. The ICCs for the total CDEIS and GELS scores were not affected: corresponding inter-rater ICCs were 0.74 [0.65, 0.81] and 0.49, [0.38, 0.61] before and 0.73 [0.65, 0.81] and 0.53 [0.42, 0.64] following application of scoring conventions. Estimations of ulcer depth, surface area, anatomical location, and stenosis were important sources of variability. CONCLUSIONS: Use of scoring conventions previously developed by expert central readers enhanced the reliability of the SES-CD but did not similarly affect the CDEIS or GELS. As the SES-CD is more likely to be reliable than the CDEIS and can be optimised with targeted training, it is the preferred instrument for use in clinical trials.

Lower handgrip strength at discharge from acute care hospitals is associated with 30-day readmission: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition at admission, using various parameters, is associated with 30-day readmission. However, the association between 30-day readmission and nutritional parameters at discharge has not been studied. METHOD: From a large cohort study (n = 1022), 413 patients with a length of stay of ≥7 days who had information on readmission and discharge location were included into the analysis. Their nutritional status at discharge was assessed by subjective global assessment, body mass index, albumin, nutritional risk index and handgrip strength. Data on demography, diagnoses and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were also collected. Missing data was handled using multiple imputations by chained equations. Association of nutrition related measures with 30 day readmission was tested in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 413 patients, 86 (20.8%) were readmitted within 30 days. The proportion of readmitted patients was higher for medical (42.2%) versus surgical patients (25.6%) (p = 0.005) and disease severity was higher in the readmission group with (median (q1, q3) CCI of 3 (2, 6) versus 2(1, 4) for no readmission (p = 0.009). Among the nutritional parameters assessed at discharge, only handgrip strength was significantly associated with 30-day readmission both in unadjusted and adjusted models. Stronger handgrip was associated with decreased chances for readmission where adjusted OR (95% CI) per unit increase were 0.95 (0.92, 0.99). Handgrip strength was not associated with disease severity assessed by CCI (p = 0.14) but was significantly associated with SGA (SGA A and B significantly different from SGA C: both p-values <0.001) after adjusting for age and gender. CONCLUSION: Lower handgrip at discharge was associated with 30-day readmission. This assessment may be useful to detect patients at risk of readmission to better individualize discharge planning including nutrition care.

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition (EN) is recommended as the preferred route for early nutrition therapy in critically ill adults over parenteral nutrition (PN). A recent large randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed no outcome differences between the two routes. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of the route of nutrition (EN versus PN) on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. METHODS: An electronic search from 1980 to 2016 was performed identifying relevant RCTs. Individual trial data were abstracted and methodological quality of included trials scored independently by two reviewers. The primary outcome was overall mortality and secondary outcomes included infectious complications, length of stay (LOS) and mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the treatment effect by dissimilar caloric intakes, year of publication and trial methodology. We performed a test of asymmetry to assess for the presence of publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 18 RCTs studying 3347 patients met inclusion criteria. Median methodological score was 7 (range, 2-12). No effect on overall mortality was found (1.04, 95 % CI 0.82, 1.33, P = 0.75, heterogeneity I(2) = 11 %). EN compared to PN was associated with a significant reduction in infectious complications (RR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.48, 0.87, P = 0.004, I(2) = 47 %). This was more pronounced in the subgroup of RCTs where the PN group received significantly more calories (RR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.37, 0.82, P = 0.003, I(2) = 0 %), while no effect was seen in trials where EN and PN groups had a similar caloric intake (RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.80, 1.10, P = 0.44, I(2) = 0 %; test for subgroup differences, P = 0.003). Year of publication and methodological quality did not influence these findings; however, a publication bias may be present as the test of asymmetry was significant (P = 0.003). EN was associated with significant reduction in ICU LOS (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.80, 95 % CI -1.23, -0.37, P = 0.0003, I(2) = 0 %) while no significant differences in hospital LOS and mechanical ventilation were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients, the use of EN as compared to PN has no effect on overall mortality but decreases infectious complications and ICU LOS. This may be explained by the benefit of reduced macronutrient intake rather than the enteral route itself.

Malnutrition at Hospital Admission-Contributors and Effect on Length of Stay: A Prospective Cohort Study From the Canadian Malnutrition Task Force.

BACKGROUND: In hospitals, length of stay (LOS) is a priority but it may be prolonged by malnutrition. This study seeks to determine the contributors to malnutrition at admission and evaluate its effect on LOS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in 18 Canadian hospitals from July 2010 to February 2013 in patients ≥ 18 years admitted for ≥ 2 days. Excluded were those admitted directly to the intensive care unit; obstetric, psychiatry, or palliative wards; or medical day units. At admission, the main nutrition evaluation was subjective global assessment (SGA). Body mass index (BMI) and handgrip strength (HGS) were also performed to assess other aspects of nutrition. Additional information was collected from patients and charts review during hospitalization. RESULTS: One thousand fifteen patients were enrolled: based on SGA, 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42%-48%) were malnourished, and based on BMI, 32% (95% CI, 29%-35%) were obese. Independent contributors to malnutrition at admission were Charlson comorbidity index > 2, having 3 diagnostic categories, relying on adult children for grocery shopping, and living alone. The median (range) LOS was 6 (1-117) days. After controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and disease-related factors and treatment, malnutrition at admission was independently associated with prolonged LOS (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86). Other nutrition-related factors associated with prolonged LOS were lower HGS at admission, receiving nutrition support, and food intake < 50%. Obesity was not a predictor. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition at admission is prevalent and associated with prolonged LOS. Complex disease and age-related social factors are contributors.

Decline in nutritional status is associated with prolonged length of stay in hospitalized patients admitted for 7 days or more: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reducing length of stay (LOS) is a priority for hospitals but patients' decline in nutritional status may have a negative impact. The aims of the study were to assess the change in nutritional status during hospitalization and determine if its decline is associated with prolonged LOS. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in 18 Canadian hospitals. Subjective global assessment (SGA) and weight measurements were performed at admission and discharge. Patient information was collected at admission and extracted from the chart during hospitalization. Association between LOS and changes in SGA or weight loss ≥5% was tested using multivariate Cox PH approach. Results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% CI. RESULTS: 409 patients (53% male) with a LOS >7 days were analyzed. Patients' median (q1,q3) age was 68 years (58,79) and LOS was 11 days (8,17). At admission, 49% of patients were well nourished (SGA A), 37% were moderately malnourished (SGA B) and 14% were severely malnourished (SGA C). From admission to discharge, 34% remained well-nourished, 29% remained malnourished (SGA B or C), 20% deteriorated and 17% improved. Of the 409 patients, 373 had weight measurements at admission and discharge: 92 (25%) had ≥5% weight loss. Multivariate models showed that after adjusting for covariates, decline in nutritional status from SGA A to B/C or SGA B to C (HR: 0.62, CI: (0.44, 0.87); HR: 0.35, CI: (0.20, 0.62) respectively) and weight loss ≥5% (HR: 0.52; CI: 0.40, 0.69) were significantly associated with longer LOS. CONCLUSION: In-hospital decline in nutritional status as assessed by SGA or weight loss ≥5% is associated with prolonged LOS independently of factors reflecting demographics, living accommodations and disease severity. This suggests a role for nutrition care in reducing LOS.

Factors associated with nutritional decline in hospitalised medical and surgical patients admitted for 7 d or more: a prospective cohort study.

This prospective cohort study was conducted in eighteen Canadian hospitals with the aim of examining factors associated with nutritional decline in medical and surgical patients. Nutritional decline was defined based on subjective global assessment (SGA) performed at admission and discharge. Data were collected on demographics, medical information, food intake and patients' satisfaction with nutrition care and meals during hospitalisation; 424 long-stay (≥7 d) patients were included; 38% of them had surgery; 51% were malnourished at admission (SGA B or C); 37% had in-hospital changes in SGA; 19·6% deteriorated (14·6% from SGA A to B/C and 5% from SGA B to C); 17·4% improved (10·6% from SGA B to A, 6·8% from SGA C to B/A); and 63·0 % patients were stable (34·4% were SGA A, 21·3% SGA B, 7·3% SGA C). One SGA C patient had weight loss ≥5%, likely due to fluid loss and was designated as stable. A subset of 364 patients with admission SGA A and B was included in the multiple logistic regression models to determine factors associated with nutritional decline. After controlling for SGA at admission and the presence of a surgical procedure, lower admission BMI, cancer, two or more diagnostic categories, new in-hospital infection, reduced food intake, dissatisfaction with food quality and illness affecting food intake were factors significantly associated with nutritional decline in medical patients. For surgical patients, only male sex was associated with nutritional decline. Factors associated with nutritional decline are different in medical and surgical patients. Identifying these factors may assist nutritional care.

Nutritional assessment: comparison of clinical assessment and objective variables for the prediction of length of hospital stay and readmission.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional assessment commonly includes multiple nutrition indicators (NIs). To promote efficiency, a minimum set is needed for the diagnosis of malnutrition in the acute care setting. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the ability of different NIs to predict outcomes of length of hospital stay and readmission to refine the detection of malnutrition in acute care. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of 1022 patients recruited from 18 acute care hospitals (academic and community), from 8 provinces across Canada, between 1 July 2010 and 28 February 2013. Participants were patients aged ≥18 y admitted to medical and surgical wards. NIs measured at admission were subjective global assessment (SGA; SGA A = well nourished, SGA B = mild or moderate malnutrition, and SGA C = severe malnutrition), Nutrition Risk Screening (2002), body weight, midarm and calf circumference, serum albumin, handgrip strength (HGS), and patient-self assessment of food intake. Logistic regression determined the independent effect of NIs on the outcomes of length of hospital stay (<7 d and ≥7 d) and readmission within 30 d after discharge. RESULTS: In total, 733 patients had complete NI data and were available for analysis. After we controlled for age, sex, and diagnosis, only SGA C (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.28, 3.75), HGS (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 0.99 per kg of increase), and reduced food intake during the first week of hospitalization (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.11) were independent predictors of length of stay. SGA C (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.24, 3.93) and HGS (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94, 0.98) but not food intake were independent predictors of 30-d readmission. CONCLUSIONS: SGA, HGS, and food intake were independent predictors of outcomes for malnutrition. Because food intake in this study was judged days after admission and HGS has a wide range of normal values, SGA is the single best predictor and should be advocated as the primary measure for diagnosis of malnutrition. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02351661.

Parenteral fish oil lipid emulsions in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: ω-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids contained in fish oils (FO) possess major anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunologic properties that could be beneficial during critical illness. We hypothesized that parenteral FO-containing emulsions may improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill. METHODS: We searched computerized databases from 1980-2012. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill adult patients that evaluated FO-containing emulsions, either in the context of parenteral nutrition (PN) or enteral nutrition (EN). RESULTS: A total of 6 RCTs (n = 390 patients) were included; the mean methodological score of all trials was 10 (range, 6-13). When the results of these studies were aggregated, FO-containing emulsions were associated with a trend toward a reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.04; P = .08; heterogeneity I (2) = 0%) and a reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation (weighted mean difference in days [WMD], -1.41; 95% CI, -3.43 to 0.61; P = .17). However, this strategy had no effect on infections (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.36; P = .35) and intensive care unit length of stay (WMD, -0.46; 95% CI, -4.87 to 3.95; P = .84, heterogeneity I (2) = 75%). CONCLUSION: FO-containing lipid emulsions may be able to decrease mortality and ventilation days in the critically ill. However, because of the paucity of clinical data, there is inadequate evidence to recommend the routine use of parenteral FO. Large, rigorously designed RCTs are required to elucidate the efficacy of parenteral FO in the critically ill.

Alternative lipid emulsions in the critically ill: a systematic review of the evidence.

PURPOSE: Parenteral lipid emulsions (LEs) are commonly rich in long-chain triglycerides derived from soybean oil (SO). SO-containing emulsions may promote systemic inflammation and therefore may adversely affect clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that alternative oil-based LEs (SO-sparing strategies) may improve clinical outcomes in critically ill adult patients compared to products containing SO emulsion only. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of parenteral SO-sparing strategies on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: We searched computerized databases from 1980 to 2013. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill adult patients that evaluated SO-sparing strategies versus SO-based LEs in the context of parenteral nutrition. RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. When the results of these RCTs were statistically aggregated, SO-sparing strategies were associated with clinically important reductions in mortality (risk ratio, RR 0.83; 95 % confidence intervals, CI 0.62, 1.11; P = 0.20), in duration of ventilation (weighted mean difference, WMD -2.57; 95 % CI -5.51, 0.37; P = 0.09), and in ICU length of stay (LOS) (WMD -2.31; 95 % CI -5.28, 0.66; P = 0.13) but none of these differences were statistically significant. SO-sparing strategies had no effect on infectious complications (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.87, 1.46; P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: Alternative oil-based LEs may be associated with clinically important reductions in mortality, duration of ventilation, and ICU LOS but lack of statistical precision precludes any clinical recommendations at this time. Further research is warranted to confirm these potential positive treatment effects.

Parenteral nutrition in the intensive care unit.

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are unable to nourish themselves orally. In addition, critical illness increases nutrient requirements as well as alters metabolism. Typically, ICU patients rapidly become malnourished unless they are provided with involuntary feeding either through a tube inserted into the GI tract, called enteral nutrition (EN), or directly into the bloodstream, called parenteral nutrition (PN). Between the 1960s and the 1980s, PN was the modality of choice and the premise was that if some is good, more is better, which led to overfeeding regimens called hyperalimentation. Later, the dangers of overfeeding, hyperglycemia, fatty liver, and increased sepsis associated with PN became recognized. In contrast, EN was not associated with these risks and it gradually became the modality of choice in the ICU. However, ICU patients in whom the gastrointestinal tract was nonfunctional (i.e., gut failure) required PN to avoid malnutrition. In addition, EN was shown, on average, to not meet nutrient requirements, and underfeeding was recognized to increase complications because of malnutrition. Hence, the balanced perspective has been reached of using EN when possible but avoiding underfeeding by supplementing with PN when required. This new role for PN is currently being debated and studied. In addition, the relative merits and needs for protein, carbohydrates, lipids, and micronutrients are areas of study.

Congenital occipital encephalocele with Dabska tumor: report of an unusual case.

Encephaloceles arise from developmental defects in neural tube formation. These lesions contain brain and meninges which herniate through a defect in the skull. These may present as isolated malformations or rarely be associated with brain tumors. We hereby discuss a case of an unusual association of an occipital encephalocele with papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma or Dabska tumor arising from the sac itself. The patient underwent resection of the herniated brain tissue with repair and closure of the dural defect. Histopathological examination revealed evidence of Dabska tumor from the sac. This is the first case report of the association of an occipital encephalocele with a rare vascular tumor, i.e. papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma.

How to perform Subjective Global Nutritional assessment in children.

Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is a method for evaluating nutritional status based on a practitioner's clinical judgment rather than objective, quantitative measurements. Encompassing historical, symptomatic, and physical parameters, SGA aims to identify an individual's initial nutrition state and consider the interplay of factors influencing the progression or regression of nutrition abnormalities. SGA has been widely used for more than 25 years to assess the nutritional status of adults in both clinical and research settings. Perceiving multiple benefits of its use in children, we recently adapted and validated the SGA tool for use in a pediatric population, demonstrating its ability to identify the nutritional status of children undergoing surgery and their risk of developing nutrition-associated complications postoperatively. Objective measures of nutritional status, on the other hand, showed no association with outcomes. The purpose of this article is to describe in detail the methods used in conducting nutrition-focused physical examinations and the medical history components of a pediatric Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment tool. Guidelines are given for performing and interpreting physical examinations that look for evidence of loss of subcutaneous fat, muscle wasting, and/or edema in children of different ages. Age-related questionnaires are offered to guide history taking and the rating of growth, weight changes, dietary intake, gastrointestinal symptoms, functional capacity, and any metabolic stress. Finally, the associated rating form is provided, along with direction for how to consider all components of a physical exam and history in the context of each other, to assign an overall rating of normal/well nourished, moderate malnutrition, or severe malnutrition. With this information, interested health professionals will be able to perform Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment to determine a global rating of nutritional status for infants, children, and adolescents, and use this rating to guide decision making about what nutrition-related attention is necessary. Dietetics practitioners and other clinicians are encouraged to incorporate physical examination for signs of protein-energy depletion when assessing the nutritional status of children.

Malnutrition, fatigue, frailty, vulnerability, sarcopenia and cachexia: overlap of clinical features.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Malnutrition, fatigue, frailty, vulnerability, sarcopenia and cachexia all phenotypically present with the same features because they are subject to the operation of similar mechanistic factors. However, the conditions referred to above differ by which mechanism dominates the cause of the clinical condition. This review discusses the overlap and differences, which distinguish as well as unite these different conditions and allow a rationale for treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: In the continuum of malnutrition, cachexia, sarcopenia and frailty the recent activities focus on two areas. The first is a better understanding of the mechanisms of cachexia and sarcopenia and frailty. In particular, the differential effects of cytokines on muscle and on the hypothalamic system. The effects of inactivity promoting the loss of body mass in cachexia and sarcopenia as well as the positive effects of exercise. The second is the development of a synthesis of available literature to develop consensus documents about the definition, causes, diagnosis and treatment of cachexia, sarcopenia and frailty. SUMMARY: Loss of body tissues resulting in wasting is a common phenotype for several different conditions which can be caused by a combination of reduced food intake, excessive requirements, altered metabolism, sepsis, trauma, ageing and inactivity. They have been referred to loosely as malnutrition but in not all will respond to simply providing nutrients. In this review the common features and the differences as they relate to cause and response to treatment are discussed.