Evidence supporting an association between hypoglycemic events and depression.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study investigated the association between hypoglycemic events (HEs) and depression events (DEs) in patients with diabetes mellitus (type 1 and type 2). METHODS: Analyzed data were from health care claims for individuals with employer-sponsored primary or Medicare supplemental insurance from the Thomson Reuters Market Scan database during the years 2008 and 2009. A baseline period (January 2008 to December 2008) was used to identify eligible patients and collect baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with diabetes (ICD-9-CM codes: 250.00, 250.01, 250.02, 250.03) who had not experienced any HEs or DEs and were not on antidepressant therapy during the baseline period. We studied the relationships between the DEs and HEs before and after adjusting for the covariates. RESULTS: Of the 923,024 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 22,735 (2.46%) patients had HEs (ICD-9-CM coded: 251.0, 251.1, 251.2, 250.8) and 6164 (0.67%) patients had DEs (ICD-9-CM: 311) during the evaluation period. Patients reporting HEs had 78% higher odds of experiencing depression than patients without HEs before adjusting for the covariates. Similarly, after adjusting for the covariates, data indicated that patients with HEs had higher odds of experiencing depression (OR = 1.726; 95% CI = 1.52-1.96). Similar analyses in different age categories showed that the OR monotonically increases with age regardless of whether the other covariates are included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-9-CM-coded HEs were independently associated with an increased risk of DEs in patients with diabetes, and this incidence increased with the patients' age. KEY LIMITATIONS: A key limitation to this study is that only those HEs that resulted in health care provider contact and subsequent claims coding indicative of hypoglycemia were included. It is likely that many cases of mild hypoglycemia, particularly those not severe enough to warrant medical attention, were not captured in this study.

Reversal of clopidogrel-induced bleeding with rFVIIa in healthy subjects: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel (Plavix®) therapy, although effective for minimizing risk of thrombotic events, is also associated with potential bleeding risk. Recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa, NovoSeven®) induces hemostasis in hemophilia patients with inhibitors (alloantibodies) and has been proposed as potential treatment for mitigating clopidogrel therapy-mediated bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation, exploratory phase I trial, we assessed the safety and effects of rFVIIa in reversing clopidogrel-enhanced bleeding in an experimentally induced punch biopsy in healthy subjects. Efficacy assessments included the reversal of bleeding characteristics (bleed duration [BD], the primary end point and blood loss volume [BV] induced by punch biopsy, and thromboelastograph [TEG®] parameters) with rFVIIa or placebo after clopidogrel treatment. RESULTS: A significant number of subjects (56%) had limited response to clopidogrel (defined as ≤30% platelet aggregation inhibition) and were discontinued from study. The remaining subjects continued and had 4 biopsies. Of 40 subjects randomized, 37 were evaluated for efficacy. Clopidogrel treatment increased BD and BV compared with the baseline biopsy. Recombinant FVIIa (10 and 20 µg/kg) significantly mitigated the clopidogrel-induced effects on BV (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively). Early trial termination limited the evaluation of effects of higher rFVIIa doses. Subgroup analyses of subjects biopsied by the same physician demonstrated significant reduction of clopidogrel-induced BD with 20 µg/kg rFVIIa (P = 0.048). Ex vivo analysis of rFVIIa demonstrated clotting dynamics presented by parameters time to clot onset (TEG®-R) and clot angle (TEG®-A) (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical study, rFVIIa (10 and 20 µg/kg) reversed the effect of clopidogrel on blood loss.

Identification of factors associated with good response to growth hormone therapy in children with short stature: results from the ANSWER Program®.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with growth in children on growth hormone (GH) therapy using data from the American Norditropin Studies: Web-enabled Research (ANSWER) Program® registry. METHODS: GH-naïve children with GH deficiency, multiple pituitary hormone deficiency, idiopathic short stature, Turner syndrome, or a history of small for gestational age were eligible (N = 1,002). Using a longitudinal statistical approach, predictive factors were identified in patients with GHD for change from baseline in height standard deviation score (ΔHSDS) following 2 years of treatment. RESULTS: Gradual increases in ΔHSDS over time were observed for all diagnostic categories. Significant predictive factors of ΔHSDS, ranked by significance were: height velocity (HV) at 4 months > baseline age > baseline HSDS > baseline body mass index (BMI) SDS > baseline insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) SDS; gender was not significant. HV at 4 months and baseline BMI SDS were positively correlated, whereas baseline age, HSDS, and IGF-I SDS were negatively correlated with ΔHSDS. CONCLUSIONS: These results may help guide GH therapy based on pretreatment characteristics and early growth response.

Exploratory study on the reversal of warfarin with rFVIIa in healthy subjects.

The use of warfarin has a well-known bleeding risk. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is a non-plasma-derived, rapid-acting, and rapidly infused potential treatment. This randomized, single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, dose-escalation, exploratory phase 1 trial assessed safety and effects of rFVIIa in reversing warfarin-induced changes in bleeding and coagulation parameters, using a punch biopsy-induced bleeding model in healthy subjects. The effects of warfarin (experiment 1) and rFVIIa (5-80 microg/kg; experiment 2) were evaluated. Outcomes were bleeding duration, blood loss, coagulation parameters, and safety. Warfarin treatment significantly increased bleeding duration and blood loss from pretreatment (experiment 1, 12 subjects). However, these parameters after rFVIIa treatment were not significantly different from placebo (experiment 2, 85 subjects). Mean activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio were reduced from warfarin-elevated levels. rFVIIa (80 microg/kg) significantly reversed warfarin effects on all thromboelastography parameters, compared with placebo (P < .05), and returned the thrombin generation speed to baseline. There were no thromboembolic or serious adverse events. In this exploratory trial, the reversal of warfarin effects was observed in the thromboelastography, thrombin generation, and clotting assays. However, this reversal did not translate to improvements in the bleeding model parameters evaluated in the punch biopsy model. Trial registration is exempt (phase 1).

Absence of QTc prolongation in a thorough QT study with subcutaneous liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analog for treatment of type 2 diabetes.

The objective of this study was to establish effects of liraglutide on the QTc interval. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, 51 healthy participants were administered placebo, 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg liraglutide once daily for 7 days each. Electrocardiograms were recorded periodically over 24 hours at the end of placebo and highest dosing periods. Four different models for QT correction were used: QTci, as the primary endpoint, and QTciL, QTcF, and QTcB as secondary endpoints. The upper bound of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval for time-matched, baseline-corrected, placebo-subtracted QTc intervals was <10 ms for all 4 correction methods. Moxifloxacin (400 mg) increased QTc intervals by 10.6 to 12.3 ms at 2 hours. There was no concentration-exposure dependency on QTc interval changes by liraglutide and no QTc thresholds above 500 ms or QTc increases >60 ms. The authors conclude that liraglutide caused no clinically relevant increases in the QTc interval.

Recombinant activated factor VII in spinal surgery: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, Phase IIa study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of recombinant-activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) in major spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Spinal fusion surgery can cause substantial blood loss and blood product transfusions. Recombinant FVIIa is approved for treatment of bleeding in patients with coagulation abnormalities and has been shown to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements in surgery in patients with no underlying coagulopathy. METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing fusion of 3 or more vertebral segments were randomized and treated on losing 10% of their estimated blood volume (with total expected surgical blood loss > or = 20%) and received 3 doses (2-hour intervals) of placebo (n = 13) or 30, 60, or 120 microg/kg rFVIIa (n = 12 per group). The primary endpoint was safety. A priori-defined efficacy endpoints included blood loss and transfusion requirements between placebo and each rFVIIa dose group, adjusted for surgery duration, number of segments fused, and estimated blood volume. RESULTS: Serious adverse events did not occur at any greater frequency in any of the treatment groups. One patient (3 x 30 microg/kg rFVIIa) with advanced cerebrovascular disease (undiagnosed, trial exclusion criterion) died 6 days after surgery due to an ischemic stroke. Mean blood loss was as follows: 2270 mL for placebo; 1909, 1262, and 1868 mL for 3 x 30, 3 x 60, and 3 x 120 microg/kg rFVIIa, respectively (differences not statistically significant). Mean adjusted surgical blood loss was as follows: 2536 mL for placebo; 1120, 400, and 823 mL for 3 x 30, 3 x 60, and 3 x 120 microg/kg rFVIIa, respectively (P < or = 0.001). Mean surgical transfusion volume was reduced by 27% to 50% with rFVIIa treatment (not significant). The mean adjusted surgical transfusion volume was reduced by 81% to 95% with rFVIIa treatment (P < or = 0.002). CONCLUSION: No safety concerns were indicated for the use of rFVIIa in patients at all doses tested; rFVIIa reduced adjusted blood loss and adjusted transfusions during spinal surgery.

Repaglinide versus nateglinide monotherapy: a randomized, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: A randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter 16-week clinical trial compared efficacy and safety of repaglinide monotherapy and nateglinide monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with diet and exercise. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Enrolled patients (n = 150) had received treatment with diet and exercise in the previous 3 months with HbA(1c) >7 and < or =12%. Patients were randomized to receive monotherapy with repaglinide (n = 76) (0.5 mg/meal, maximum dose 4 mg/meal) or nateglinide (n = 74) (60 mg/meal, maximum dose 120 mg/meal) for 16 weeks. Primary and secondary efficacy end points were changes in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values from baseline, respectively. Postprandial glucose, insulin, and glucagon were assessed after a liquid test meal (baseline, week 16). Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse events or hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Mean baseline HbA(1c) values were similar in both groups (8.9%). Final HbA(1c) values were lower for repaglinide monotherapy than nateglinide monotherapy (7.3 vs. 7.9%). Mean final reductions of HbA(1c) were significantly greater for repaglinide monotherapy than nateglinide monotherapy (-1.57 vs. -1.04%; P = 0.002). Mean changes in FPG also demonstrated significantly greater efficacy for repaglinide than nateglinide (-57 vs. -18 mg/dl; P < 0.001). HbA(1c) values <7% were achieved by 54% of repaglinide-treated patients versus 42% for nateglinide. Median final doses were 6.0 mg/day for repaglinide and 360 mg/day for nateglinide. There were 7% of subjects treated with repaglinide (five subjects with one episode each) who had minor hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose <50 mg/dl) versus 0 patients for nateglinide. Mean weight gain at the end of the study was 1.8 kg in the repaglinide group as compared with 0.7 kg for the nateglinide group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients previously treated with diet and exercise, repaglinide and nateglinide had similar postprandial glycemic effects, but repaglinide monotherapy was significantly more effective than nateglinide monotherapy in reducing HbA(1c) and FPG values after 16 weeks of therapy.

Treatment of type 2 diabetes with a combination regimen of repaglinide plus pioglitazone.

The efficacy and safety of combination therapy (repaglinide plus pioglitazone) was compared to repaglinide or pioglitazone in 24-week treatment of type 2 diabetes. This randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group study enrolled 246 adults (age 24-85) who had shown inadequate response in previous sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy (HbA(1c) > 7%). Prior therapy was withdrawn for 2 weeks, followed by randomization to repaglinide, pioglitazone, or repaglinide/pioglitazone. In the first 12 weeks of treatment, repaglinide doses were optimized, followed by 12 weeks of maintenance therapy. Pioglitazone dosage was fixed at 30 mg per day. Baseline HbA(1c) values were comparable (9.0% for repaglinide, 9.1% for pioglitazone, 9.3% for combination). Mean changes in HbA(1c) values at the end of treatment were -1.76% for repaglinide/pioglitazone, -0.18% for repaglinide, +0.32% for pioglitazone. Fasting plasma glucose reductions were -82 mg/dl for combination therapy, -34 mg/dl for repaglinide, -18 mg/dl for pioglitazone. Minor hypoglycemia occurred in 5% of patients for the combination, 8% for repaglinide, and 3% for pioglitazone. Weight gains for combination therapy were correlated to individual HbA(1c) reductions. In summary, for patients who had previously failed oral antidiabetic monotherapy, the combination repaglinide/pioglitazone had acceptable safety, with greater reductions of glycemic parameters than therapy using either agent alone.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy: repaglinide plus metformin versus nateglinide plus metformin.

OBJECTIVE: An open-label, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of repaglinide versus nateglinide, when used in a combination regimen with metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Enrolled patients (n = 192) had HbA(1c) >7% and < or =12% during previous treatment with a sulfonylurea, metformin, or low-dose Glucovance (glyburide < or =2.5 mg, metformin < or =500 mg). After a 4-week metformin run-in therapy period (doses escalated to 1,000 mg b.i.d.), patients were randomized to addition of repaglinide (n = 96) (1 mg/meal, maximum 4 mg/meal) or nateglinide (n = 96) (120 mg/meal, reduced to 60 mg if needed) to the regimen for 16 weeks. Glucose, insulin, and glucagon were assessed after a liquid test meal at baseline and week 16. RESULTS: Final HbA(1c) values were lower for repaglinide/metformin treatment than for nateglinide/metformin (7.1 vs. 7.5%). Repaglinide/metformin therapy showed significantly greater mean reductions of HbA(1c) (-1.28 vs. -0.67%; P < 0.001) and of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (-39 vs. -21 mg/dl; P = 0.002). Self-monitoring of blood glucose profiles were significantly lower for repaglinide/metformin before breakfast, before lunch, and at 2:00 A.M. Changes in the area under the curve of postprandial glucose, insulin, or glucagon peaks after a test meal were not significantly different for the two treatment groups during this study. Median final doses were 5.0 mg/day for repaglinide and 360 mg/day for nateglinide. Safety assessments were comparable for the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of repaglinide to metformin therapy resulted in reductions of HbA(1c) and FPG values that were significantly greater than the reductions observed for addition of nateglinide.

Accuracy and precision of the NovoPen 3 insulin delivery device after mechanical and temperature stresses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the precision, accuracy, and durability of an insulin pen injection device (NovoPen 3) at three preset doses (2 IU, 35 IU, and 70 IU) after exposure to various stress and durability tests that were intended to simulate daily use by patients. METHODS: Twenty-nine reusable NovoPen 3 insulin delivery devices were tested. The precision and accuracy of 10 insulin pen devices were evaluated after they were subjected to multiple thermal and vibration stress tests. Another 10 pen devices were subjected to a free-fall test. Nine other insulin pens were subjected to endurance testing that simulated 5 years of injections. RESULTS: The accuracy (as measured by the relative error of the delivered dose of insulin) of the insulin pen injection devices was within 1% of the preset dose after all stress or endurance tests. A free-fall test produced no indication of damage except for broken clips and snap catches on the caps, which did not affect the integrity or performance of the insulin pens. The precision of the pen devices (as measured by relative standard deviations of delivered volumes of insulin) was likewise high after thermal stress, vibration stress, free-fall testing, or 5-year endurance testing. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study showed that the insulin pen injection devices tested were durable under conditions of stress likely to be encountered in daily patient use. Neither a wide variety of repetitive stresses nor insulin injection cycles corresponding to 5 years of use affected the accuracy or precision enough to have clinical significance for reliable insulin delivery.