Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35409782

ABSTRACT

Unintentional non-fire related (UNFR) carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning continues to cause fatalities. The narrative verdicts from coroners concerning fatal UNFR CO poisoning in England and Wales, 1998-2019, were collated by the Office for National Statistics. Search terms related to CO exposure were used to obtain information regarding the circumstances of death. Findings were grouped by the location of death, the source of CO, and the reason or behaviour underlying the exposure. There were 750 deaths (77% male). The annual number of deaths decreased over the period studied. Two thirds (68%) of the deaths occurred in the autumn or winter. From the records with information, 59% of deaths occurred within a dwelling (67% male). Males also predominated deaths within vehicles (91%) and garages or outbuildings (95%). From the deaths with information, domestic piped gas was the most common source of CO (36%) and the most frequent underlying factor was inadequate ventilation of exhaust gases (39%, 91% male). Despite the decrease in the annual number of deaths over the study period, there remains a clear need for measures that raise awareness of the dangers of CO poisoning, especially amongst men working alone in garages or outbuildings. Education campaigns and fitting and maintaining CO alarms in high-risk areas should be encouraged.


Subject(s)
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning , Fires , Carbon Monoxide Poisoning/epidemiology , Coroners and Medical Examiners , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Wales/epidemiology
2.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 55(6): 425-31, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16140835

ABSTRACT

Many people live near point sources of air pollution such as industrial sites and waste disposal operations and there are often suggestions of clusters of disease around such activities. Such alleged clusters will generate significant public concern and media interest and in many cases will warrant detailed investigation. However, the ability of current epidemiological methods to investigate such clusters is limited, particularly with regard to obtaining reliable and accurate population exposure data. In many cases, the key question is whether releases from a point source result in a significant increase in exposure or whether other sources (background exposure) give rise to the dominant exposure. This review considers some of the issues around point sources including methods of estimating exposure and briefly discusses some of the epidemiological evidence linking respiratory disease and cancer with specific industries such as coking works and incinerators.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/analysis , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Carcinogens, Environmental/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Epidemiologic Methods , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Humans , Male , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...