ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Celecoxib (CXB) has been explored as an anti-inflammatory or chemopreventive drug for topical treatment of skin diseases and cancer. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this work was to investigate the potential of dimethylsufoxide (DMSO) and Azone (AZ) as penetration enhancers (P.Es) for topical delivery of CXB. METHOD: The in vitro studies, drug release, skin permeability and potential cytotoxicity/genotoxicity were carried out with formulations containing or not DMSO or AZ (5% and 10%). Skin irritation in rabbits and topical anti-inflammatory activity in mice were assayed in vivo. RESULTS: Skin permeation was minimal while higher retention in stratum corneum (SC) and epidermis plus dermis was found (28.0 and 3-fold respectively) from 10.0% AZ compared to the control indicating a localized CXB effect. CXB associated to 5% or 10% DMSO has shown high drug permeation through skin with low retention. Associations of CXB with both enhancers were not cytotoxic or genotoxic, suggesting safety for cutaneous application. In vivo skin irritation assays of all formulations indicated mild irritation effects and, thus, possible use for longer periods. In vivo anti-inflammatory tests showed that ear edema could be inhibited by CXB associated with 5.0% DMSO (53.0%) or 10.0% AZ (40.0%). These inhibition values were almost 2-fold higher when compared to a commercial formula. CONCLUSION: Although DMSO- associated CXB is an efficient edema inhibitor its high skin permeation suggests risks of systemic effects, whereas association to 10% AZ may improve topical delivery of the drug with good anti-inflammatory activity and no cytotoxic/genotoxic or significant skin irritation effects.
Subject(s)
Azepines/administration & dosage , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/administration & dosage , Skin Absorption/drug effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Animals , Azepines/chemistry , Azepines/therapeutic use , Celecoxib/chemistry , Celecoxib/therapeutic use , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/chemistry , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/chemistry , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/therapeutic use , Edema/drug therapy , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/genetics , Male , Mice , Mutagenicity Tests , Rabbits , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/drug effects , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics , Skin/drug effects , Skin/metabolism , Skin Irritancy Tests , SwineABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the potential effects of oleic acid (OA) and glycerol monooleate (GMO) on the skin delivery of CXB. METHODS: The influence of both OA and GMO (5.0% or 10.0%) on the in vitro skin permeability of CXB (2.0%) was evaluated using propylene glycol (PG) as a vehicle. Also the in vitro potential cytotoxicity and genotoxicity and in vivo assays (skin irritation in rabbits and topical anti-inflammatory activity by in mice) were conducted. RESULTS: As expected, the amount of CXB that permeated through the skin was minimal, but drug retention on the viable skin (epidermis plus dermis) was higher in association with treatment with 5.0% OA or GMO compared to the control treatment, meaning that there was a localized effect of CXB in the skin. No formulation presented cytotoxic or genotoxic potential, suggesting safety for cutaneous application. In vivo skin irritation assays indicated that no formulation was irritating to the skin becomes its use possible for a prolonged time. In vivo anti-inflammatory experiments indicated that both edema and protein extravasation were inhibited with a maximum % inhibition of 53.5.0% and 61.0% for 5.0 % GMO, respectively, and 48.0% and 35.5% for 5.0% OA, respectively. Such formulations were able to inhibit around twofold the percentage of ear edema in mice compared to a commercial product reference diclofenac commercial formula. CONCLUSION: There is no topical formulation currently available that contains both CXB and 5.0% GMO or OA, suggesting them as potential adjuvants that improve the skin delivery of CXB.
