Using a Dedicated Extremity MRI Scanner for Depicting Anatomic Structures of Common Wrist Pathologies: A Pilot Comparison with a 3-Tesla MRI Scanner.

Background This pilot study explored the value of a dedicated extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner by focusing on the qualitative depiction of important wrist structures in common wrist pathologies, the overall image quality, artifacts, and participant experience in undergoing the examinations. Methods Images of the right wrist of 10 healthy adult volunteers were acquired with a 0.31-Tesla (T) dedicated extremity MRI and a 3-T MRI system, using a dedicated wrist coil. Images were separately evaluated by three radiologists. Paired images were randomized and graded for the visibility of anatomical details, including the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC; central disc, meniscus homolog, and ulnar attachment), carpal ligaments (scapholunate [SL] and lunotriquetral [LT] ligaments), intercarpal cartilage, and median and ulnar nerves. Mean values and standard deviations of evaluation results were calculated for each sequence. Participants' experience in undergoing the examination in both MRI scanners was explored using a questionnaire. Results The mean values of anatomic structures and overall image quality were significantly in favor of the 3-T MRI scanner, compared with the dedicated extremity MRI scanner. With respect to patient satisfaction in undergoing the examination, the overall trend suggested that patients were more in favor of the dedicated extremity MRI scanner. Conclusion For defining the real clinical value of the dedicated MRI scanner in the treatment of hand and wrist pathology, studies focused on pathologies are needed, which is certainly warranted, considering the important benefits of these devices including lower costs and higher accessibility for both patients and health care providers.

Using an Office-Based, Dedicated Extremity MRI Scanner for Depicting Important Structures in Common Wrist Pathologies: A Pilot Comparison with a Conventional MRI Scanner.

Background Compared with the conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dedicated MRI scanners are more accessible. Images of a dedicated 1.0-T MRI specifically developed for the hand and wrist were compared with images of a conventional 1.5-T MRI. Methods Paired images of the right wrist were randomized and separately graded by two experienced radiologists for the quality of anatomical details, including the triangular fibrocartilage complex, carpal ligaments, intercarpal cartilage, median and ulnar nerves, overall image quality, and artifacts. Interrater reliability was measured with the percentage of exact agreement and agreement within a range of ± 1 score point. Participant experience of undergoing the examination in both MRI scanners was evaluated using a questionnaire. Results The overall image quality of all sequences was considered to be moderate to high. In 25 of 38 paired images, no statistically significant difference was found between the MRI scanners. Ten scores were found to be in favor of the dedicated extremity MRI. Within a range of ± 1 score point, the extremity MRI and the conventional MRI demonstrated an interrater agreement of 67 to 100% and 70 to 100%, respectively. Among the respondents of the questionnaire, the extremity MRI scored better for participant satisfaction when compared with the conventional MRI. Conclusions In healthy volunteers, the dedicated extremity MRI generally is similar or superior to the conventional MRI in the depiction of anatomical structures of the wrists, image quality, and artifacts, and significantly scored better on participant satisfaction. Future clinical studies should focus on defining the diagnostic value of the extremity MRI in wrist pathologies.

[A supracondylar process in a child with arm pain]. / Een botuitsteeksel bij een kind met pijn in zijn arm.

A 14-year-old boy had arm pain after a traumatic event. An X-ray showed a supracondylar process of the humerus, which is a coincidental finding but sometimes has clinical consequences. It may compress the median nerve or brachial artery, leading to symptoms. Resection can give complete relieve of symptoms.

MR imaging of the brachial plexus: current imaging sequences, normal findings, and findings in a spectrum of focal lesions with MR-pathologic correlation.

Currently in many centers, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the technique of choice for the assessment of brachial plexopathies. The anatomy of the brachial plexus is complex, and is surrounded by other anatomic structures, making artifact-free imaging quite challenging. With the faster breathing-independent and breath-hold MR imaging sequences, brachial plexopathies can be assessed with more confidence. Over a 2-year period, 20 patients underwent MR imaging of the brachial plexus at our department. MR imaging was based on a comprehensive protocol, including T(1)-weighted gradient echo, T(2)-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo, and gadolinium-enhanced T(1)-weighted gradient echo with fat suppression. Nine of the 20 patients had proved diagnoses at pathology, and included schwannoma (n = 2), ganglioneuroblastoma (n = 1), hemangioma (n = 1), metastatic breast cancer (n = 2), Pancoast tumor (n = 1), and metastatic lung cancer (n = 2). Most of the lesions had presenting symptoms, such as pain, swelling, paresthesia, and arm weakness. At MR imaging, the location and characteristics of the lesions on different types of T(1)-weighted and T(2)-weighted sequences were described with pathologic correlation.