ABSTRACT
Budgerigars were trained to discriminate complex sounds with two different types of spectral profiles from flat-spectrum, wideband noise. In one case, complex sounds with a sinusoidal ripple in (log) amplitude across (log) frequency bandwidth were generated by combining 201 logarithmically spaced tones covering the frequency region from 500 Hz to 10 kHz. A second type of rippled stimulus was generated by delaying broadband noise and adding it to the original noise in an iterative fashion. In each case, thresholds for modulation depth (i.e., peak-to-valley in dB) were measured at several different ripple frequencies (i.e., cycles/octave for logarithmic profiles) or different repetition pitches (i.e., delay for ripple noises). Budgerigars were similar to humans in detecting ripple at low spatial frequencies, but were considerably more sensitive than humans in detecting ripples in log ripple spectra at high spatial frequencies. Budgerigars were also similar to humans in detecting linear ripple in broadband noise over a wide range of repetition pitches. Taken together, these data show that the avian auditory system is at least as good, if not better, than the human auditory system at detecting spectral ripples in noise despite gross anatomical differences in both the peripheral and central auditory nervous systems.
