ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The treatment of severely injured patients in the resuscitation room of an emergency department requires numerous critical decisions, often under immense time pressure, which places very high demands on the facility and the interdisciplinary team. Computer-based cognitive aids are a valuable tool, especially in education and training of medical professionals. For the management of polytrauma cases, TraumaFlow, a workflow management-based clinical decision support system, was developed. The system supports the registration and coordination of activities in the resuscitation room and actively recommends diagnosis and treatment actions. METHODS: Based on medical guidelines, a resuscitation room algorithm was developed according to the cABCDE scheme. The algorithm was then modeled using the process description language BPMN 2.0 and implemented in a workflow management system. In addition, a web-based user interface that provides assistance functions was developed. An evaluation study was conducted with 11 final-year medical students and three residents to assess the applicability of TraumaFlow in a case-based training scenario. RESULTS: TraumaFlow significantly improved guideline-based decision-making, provided more complete therapy, and reduced treatment errors. The system was shown to be beneficial not only for the education of low- and medium-experienced users but also for the training of highly experienced physicians. 92% of the participants felt more confident with computer-aided decision support and considered TraumaFlow useful for the training of polytrauma treatment. In addition, 62% acknowledged a higher training effect. CONCLUSION: TraumaFlow enables real-time decision support for the treatment of polytrauma patients. It improves guideline-based decision-making in complex and critical situations and reduces treatment errors. Supporting functions, such as the automatic treatment documentation and the calculation of medical scores, enable the trauma team to focus on the primary task. TraumaFlow was developed to support the training of medical students and experienced professionals. Each training session is documented and can be objectively and qualitatively evaluated.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The management of polytraumatized patients is set in a stressful environment with numerous critical decisions in a brief amount of time. Working along a standardised procedure can improve the outcome for these patients and reduce mortality. To help clinical practitioners, we developed "TraumaFlow", a workflow management system for the primary care of polytrauma patients based on the current treatment guidelines. This study sought to validate the system and investigate its effect on user performance and perceived workload. METHODS: The computer-assisted decision support system was tested in two scenarios in a trauma room of a level 1 trauma centre by 11 final-year medical students and 3 residents. In simulated polytrauma scenarios, the participants functioned as a trauma leader. The first scenario was performed without decision support and the second with support by "TraumaFlow" via tablet. During each scenario, the performance was evaluated in a standardized assessment. After each scenario, the participants answered a questionnaire on workload [NASA Raw Task Load Index (NASA RTLX)]. RESULTS: In total, 14 participants (mean 28 ± 4 years, 43% female) managed 28 scenarios. During the first scenario without computer-assisted support, the participants achieved a mean of 6.6 out of 12 points (SD 1.2, range 5 to 9). With the support of TraumaFlow, the mean performance score was significantly higher with 11.6 out of 12 points (SD 0.5, range 11 to 12, p < 0.001). In the 14 scenarios performed without support, there was no run in which no errors were made. In comparison, ten of the 14 scenarios performed with TraumaFlow ran free of relevant errors. The mean improvement in the performance score was 42%. There was a significant decrease in the mean self-reported mental stress level in scenarios with support of TraumaFlow (55, SD 24) as compared to scenarios without support (72, SD 13, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: In a simulated environment, computer-assisted decision-making improved the performance of the trauma leader, helped to adhere to clinical guidelines, and reduced stress in a fast-acting environment. In reality, this may improve the treatment outcome for the patient.
