ABSTRACT
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the applicability and reliability of a screening questionnaire to detect patients at high-risk of latex allergy; to assess the importance of other allergies such as profilin allergies (pollinosis) for presence of latex sensitization; and to determine the clinical effectiveness of preemptive avoidance of latex exposure in high-risk patients. DESIGN: Prospective, clinical trial. SETTING: Operative theater of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 95 adult patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were preoperatively screened and classified for present latex allergy (high-risk and low-risk group) according to a specially designed screening questionnaire. Anesthesia and surgery in the high-risk group were performed strictly avoiding latex-containing materials. The low-risk group (other allergies including pollinosis) received routine treatment, without latex-avoidance. Effects of latex avoidance or exposure were evaluated by measuring specific IgE titers perioperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: According to the questionnaire, 45 patients at high risk were defined. Validity of classification of high-risk patients is supported by significantly higher total IgE and latex and grass profilin specific IgE compared to the low-risk group. There were no significant differences in other profilin-specific IgEs. In one case of severe anaphylactic reaction a drop of latex-specific IgE during surgery could be observed. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire allowed the identification of most patients at high risk for latex allergy. In isolated pollinosis no changes in any specific IgE levels were detectable. Strict avoidance of perioperative latex exposure in high-risk patients increases safety during anesthesia and surgery.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Latex Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Amino Acid Sequence , Cross Reactions , Environmental Illness/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Immunoglobulin E/biosynthesis , Latex/chemistry , Latex Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Poaceae/chemistry , Pollen/chemistry , Pollen/immunology , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To provide a mechanism-based acute pain management strategy for early phantom limb pain following traumatic amputations and to collect first evidence of its acute and potentially preventative effects on the formation and maintenance of phantom limb pain. The combination of continuous brachial plexus analgesia and prolonged block of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors over 4 weeks aimed to attenuate peripheral and central sensitization, currently thought to be substantially involved in establishing and maintaining phantom limb pain. CASE REPORT: Two patients, after traumatic upper limb amputations and early phantom limb pain, were treated on the second and fifth day following amputation by continuous brachial plexus analgesia with ropivacaine 0.375% (30 ml for the initial block, continuous infusion rate = 5 ml/h) for 5 (Patient 1) and 9 days (Patient 2). Both patients received oral memantine (a noncompetitive NMDA-receptor antagonist) in increasing doses from 10 to 30 mg/d over a 4-week period. Ropivacaine only produced minor motor block, with almost unimpaired motor function. Memantine was well tolerated and no relevant side effects were observed. In both patients the treatment prevented the establishment of phantom limb pain, which did not reappear during follow-up of 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of long-term regional analgesia with prolonged block of NMDA receptors might be effective for treatment and prevention of phantom limb pain following traumatic amputations. The absence of clinically relevant side effects, together with maintained motor function suggests this treatment to be a promising preventive strategy for phantom limb pain following traumatic amputations.
