The benefits and pitfalls of post-mortem computed tomography in forensic external examination: A retrospective study of 145 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Nowadays, post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) has become an integral part of Forensic practice. The purpose of the study was to determine PMCT impact on diagnosis of the cause of death within the context of the external examination of the body, when autopsy has, at first, not been requested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 145 cases for which unenhanced PMCT was performed in addition to the external examination of the body from January 2014 to July 2015 at the Institute of Forensic medicine in Strasbourg (France). We confronted final reports from forensic pathologist to the corresponding PMCT reports. Data were collected in a contingency table and the impact of PMCT on the final conclusions of the forensic pathologist was evaluated via a Chi2 test. RESULTS: PMCT results significantly impact the final conclusions of forensic pathologist (p<0,001). In some cases, PMCT permits etiological diagnosis by revealing a cause of death hidden from external examination (mainly natural death) or by supporting the clinical findings of the forensic pathologist. In other cases (traumatic death), PMCT enables fast and exhaustive lesion assessment. Lastly, there are situations where PMCT may be ineffective (intoxication, hanging or some natural deaths). CONCLUSION: Performing PMCT within the context of the external examination of the body when autopsy has, at first, not been requested could bring significant benefits in diagnosing the cause of death. The impact of PMCT varies depending on the circumstances of death.

CT arthrography and anatomical correlation of the bare area of the ulnar trochlear fossa: a risk of misdiagnosis of cartilage ulcerations.

AIMS: There is a variable bare area on the ulnar trochlear fossa that may be somehow interpreted as a cartilage defect. We aimed to correlate radiological images and dissections of this bare spot with CT arthrography imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a double study that included 10 unpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric elbows (CT arthrography + dissection) and 40 CT arthrography of patients to investigate the 3-D architecture of the trochlear fossa of the ulna. Positioning, shape and measurements of the bare spot of each ulna were measured and correlated. A total of 40 were analyzed with this protocol of measurements to validate the anatomical findings. RESULTS: The bare spot area is located 15.8 mm from the tip of the olecranon and 13.8 mm from the coronoid process (mean values). This area measures 4.1 mm in cranio-caudal plane, 2.2 mm in transversal plane. This area is located above a small subchondral tubercle that measures 1.0 mm in antero-posterior axis. No significant difference has been found between left and right elbow regarding its positioning and shape. A significant difference has been found between genders regarding the positioning of this area but not according to its shape. CONCLUSION: The ulnar trochlear notch has a small area without cartilage. This bare area is located at the site of fusion of the different ossification center of the proximal ulna. It should not be interpreted as a chondral lesion. The existence of a subchondral tubercle clearly indicates that this uncovered zone is normal. Radiologist should consider this when interpreting elbow CT arthrography.