Peer-provided psychological intervention for Syrian refugees: results of a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of Problem Management Plus.

BACKGROUND: The mental health burden among refugees in high-income countries (HICs) is high, whereas access to mental healthcare can be limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of a peer-provided psychological intervention (Problem Management Plus; PM+) in reducing symptoms of common mental disorders (CMDs) among Syrian refugees in the Netherlands. METHODS: We conducted a single-blind, randomised controlled trial among adult Syrian refugees recruited in March 2019-December 2021 (No. NTR7552). Individuals with psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) >15) and functional impairment (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) >16) were allocated to PM+ in addition to care as usual (PM+/CAU) or CAU only. Participants were reassessed at 1-week and 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome was depression/anxiety combined (Hopkins Symptom Checklist; HSCL-25) at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included depression (HSCL-25), anxiety (HSCL-25), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; PCL-5), impairment (WHODAS 2.0) and self-identified problems (PSYCHLOPS; Psychological Outcomes Profiles). Primary analysis was intention-to-treat. FINDINGS: Participants (n=206; mean age=37 years, 62% men) were randomised into PM+/CAU (n=103) or CAU (n=103). At 3-month follow-up, PM+/CAU had greater reductions on depression/anxiety relative to CAU (mean difference -0.25; 95% CI -0.385 to -0.122; p=0.0001, Cohen's d=0.41). PM+/CAU also showed greater reductions on depression (p=0.0002, Cohen's d=0.42), anxiety (p=0.001, Cohen's d=0.27), PTSD symptoms (p=0.0005, Cohen's d=0.39) and self-identified problems (p=0.03, Cohen's d=0.26), but not on impairment (p=0.084, Cohen's d=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: PM+ effectively reduces symptoms of CMDs among Syrian refugees. A strength was high retention at follow-up. Generalisability is limited by predominantly including refugees with a resident permit. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Peer-provided psychological interventions should be considered for scale-up in HICs.

Effectiveness of a peer-refugee delivered psychological intervention to reduce psychological distress among adult Syrian refugees in the Netherlands: study protocol.

Background: Syrian refugees face multiple hardships and adversities which put them at risk for the development of mental health problems. However, access to adequate mental health care in host countries is limited. The WHO has developed Problem Management Plus (PM+), a brief, scalable psychological intervention, delivered by non-specialist helpers, that addresses common mental disorders in people affected by adversity. This study is part of the STRENGTHS project, that aims to evaluate peer-refugee delivered psychological interventions for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the peer-refugee delivered PM+ intervention among Syrian refugees with elevated levels of psychological distress in the Netherlands. Methods: PM+ will be tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) among Arabic-speaking Syrian refugees in the Netherlands aged 18 years and above with self-reported psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; K10 >15) and impaired daily functioning (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule; WHODAS 2.0 >16). Participants (N = 380) will be randomized into care as usual with PM+ (CAU/PM+, n = 190) or CAU only (CAU, n = 190). Baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 3-month and 12-month follow-up assessments will be conducted. Primary outcomes are symptoms of depression and anxiety. Secondary outcomes are functional impairment, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, self-identified problems, anger, health and productivity costs, and hair cortisol concentrations. A process evaluation will be carried out to evaluate treatment dose, protocol fidelity and stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to implementing PM+. Results and Conclusions: PM+ has proved effectiveness in other populations and settings. After positive evaluation, the adapted manual and training materials for individual PM+ will be made available through the WHO to encourage further replication and scaling up. Trial registration: Trial registration Dutch Trial Registry, NL7552, registered prospectively on March 1, 2019. Medical Ethics Review Committee VU Medical Center Protocol ID 2017.320, 7 September 2017.

Antecedentes: Los refugiados sirios atraviesan muchas dificultades y adversidades, las cuales los ponen en riesgo para el desarrollo de problemas de salud mental. Sin embargo, el acceso a servicios de salud mental en los países que albergan a refugiados es limitado. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha desarrollado la intervención de Gestión de Problemas Plus (PM+, por sus siglas en inglés), una intervención psicológica breve, en etapas, realizada por facilitadores no especialistas, y que está dirigido al abordaje de los trastornos mentales más comunes en personas afectadas por la adversidad. Este estudio es parte de un proyecto más grande llamado STRENGTHS, cuyo objetivo es evaluar las intervenciones psicológicas brindadas por un refugiado a otro adaptadas para refugiados sirios en Europa y Medio Oriente.Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad y costo-efectividad de la adaptación de la intervención PM+ brindada por un refugiado a otro, en refugiados sirios con niveles elevados de malestar psicologico en los Países Bajos.Métodos: La adaptación de la intervención PM+ será evaluada en un ensayo clínico aleatorizado en refugiados sirios de habla árabe en los Países Bajos, en mayores de 18 años, con malestar psicológico auto-reportado (mediante la Escala de Kessler para Malestar Psicológico, K10>15) y deterioro en el funcionamiento diario (Registro de Evaluación de Discapacidad de la OMS; WHODAS 2.0 >16). Los participantes (N=380) serán distribuidos aleatoriamente en un grupo de tratamiento usual con PM+ (TU/PM+, n=190) y en uno de solo tratamiento usual (TU, n=190). Se tomarán evaluaciones de base, luego de la primera semana de la intervención, luego de los tres meses, y luego de los 12 meses. Estas evaluaciones serán asistidas por una aplicación de auto-entrevista con soporte de audio para tablet. Los resultados primarios son los síntomas de depresión y ansiedad. Los resultados primarios son los síntomas de depresión y ansiedad. Los resultados secundarios son el deterioro funcional, síntomas de estrés traumático, problemas auto-identificados, ira, costos en salud y productividad, y concentraciones de cortisol en el cabello. Se realizará un proceso de evaluación para valorar las opiniones de los interesados respecto a las barreras y facilitadores para implementar la intervención PM+, así como la dosis del tratamiento y la adherencia al protocolo.Discusión: La intervención PM+ ha mostrado efectividad en otras poblaciones y escenarios. Luego de obtener una evaluación positiva de la PM+ en refugiados sirios, se harán disponibles manuales y material de entrenamiento para PM+ individual a través de la OMS, de manera que se incentive la posterior replicación de la intervención y se aumente progresivamente su aplicación.

Paraprofessional counselling within asylum seekers' groups in the Netherlands: transferring an approach for a non-western context to a European setting.

This article presents the application of a psychosocial care approach, which has been developed for and in a non-western context, within an asylum seekers' setting in the Netherlands. The project aimed to increase access to basic psychosocial care to a target population that experiences difficulties in entering mental healthcare services, by a group of trained peer asylum seekers and refugees. The development of an informal paraprofessional support system makes better use of existing resources, provides secondary benefits for the participants and helps to overcome the treatment gap between perceived needs and the formal mental healthcare system. The article describes the key components of such an approach, the Dutch context, the project implementation and finishes with a discussion on outcomes, strengths and weaknesses, risks and recommendations. In summary, we found this community approach to be applicable and relevant within an asylum seekers' centre, as it incorporates an additional easy-access level of psychosocial care and social agency, which seemed to empower participants and help prevent psychosocial problems from becoming more severe.