The relationship between academic performance and recreation use among first-year medical students.

INTRODUCTION: Self-care activities, including exercise, may be neglected by medical students in response to increasing academic demands. Low levels of exercise among medical students may have ripple effects on patient care and counseling. This study investigates the reciprocal role of recreation use and academic performance among first-year medical students. METHODS: We combined retrospective administrative data from four cohorts of first-year medical students at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign from 2006 to 2010 (n=408). We estimated regression models to clarify the role of changes in recreation use before examinations on changes in academic performance, and vice versa. RESULTS: The use of recreation facilities by first-year medical students was highly skewed. We found that changes in recreation use before an exam were positively associated with changes in exam performance, and vice versa. Students who make large decreases in their recreation use are likely to decrease their exam scores, rather than increase them. DISCUSSION: Students who make decreases in their recreation, on average, are likely to decrease their exam scores. These findings suggest that medical students may be able to boost their achievement through wellness interventions, even if they are struggling with exams. We find no evidence that decreasing wellness activities will help improve exam performance.

Association of third-year medical students' first clerkship with overall clerkship performance and examination scores.

CONTEXT: Anecdotal experience has suggested that third-year medical students whose first clerkship is internal medicine may have superior performance throughout the academic year. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the order of clerkships by specialty is associated with student performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Clerkship performance records of medical students at all 4 campuses of the University of Illinois College of Medicine who completed their third-year core clerkships from July 2000 through June 2008 (N = 2236) were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis of covariance was used to test for between-group differences (by first clerkship) in mean National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination scores (range, 0-100), preceptor ratings of clerkship clinical performances (range, 12-30), total overall clerkship grades (range, 12-30), and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 scores, adjusted for sex, campus, and USMLE Step 1 score. RESULTS: First clerkship specialty was significantly associated with mean subject examination scores (family medicine, 71.96 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 70.90-72.98], internal medicine, 73.86 [95% CI, 73.33-74.39], obstetrics/gynecology, 72.36 [95% CI, 71.64-73.04], pediatrics, 73.11 [95% CI, 72.38-73.84], psychiatry, 72.17 [95% CI, 71.52-72.81], surgery, 72.37 [95% CI, 71.73-73.02]; P < .001) and overall clerkship grades (family medicine, 24.20 [95% CI, 23.90-24.90], internal medicine, 25.33 [95% CI, 25.07-25.60], obstetrics/gynecology, 24.68 [95% CI, 24.32-25.05], pediatrics, 24.92 [95% CI, 24.59-25.27], psychiatry, 24.61 [95% CI, 24.33-25.01], surgery 24.97 [95% CI, 24.64-25.30]; P = .01). There was no significant association with preceptor ratings or USMLE Step 2 scores. Pairwise comparisons for mean total overall clerkship grades showed a significant difference for students taking internal medicine first compared with obstetrics/gynecology (mean difference, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.18-1.12), psychiatry (mean difference, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.20-1.12), and family medicine (mean difference, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.37-1.50). CONCLUSION: Among students at 4 campuses of a US medical school, clerkship order was significantly associated with performance on clerkship subject examinations and overall grades but not with clerkship clinical performance or USMLE Step 2 scores.

Gender plays no role in student ability to perform on computer-based examinations.

BACKGROUND: To see if there is a difference in performance when students switch from traditional paper-and-pencil examinations to computer-based examinations, and to determine whether there are gender differences in student performance in these two examination formats. METHODS: This study involved first year medical students at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign over three Academic Years 2002-03/2003-04 and 2003-05. Comparisons of student performance by overall class and gender were made. Specific comparisons within courses that utilized both the paper-and-pencil and computer formats were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall performance scores for students among the various Academic Years revealed no differences between exams given in the traditional pen-and-paper and computer formats. Further, when we looked specifically for gender differences in performance between these two testing formats, we found none. CONCLUSION: The format for examinations in the courses analyzed does not affect student performance. We find no evidence for gender differences in performance on exams on pen-and-paper or computer-based exams.

Medical students who decompress during the M-1 year outperform those who fail and repeat it: a study of M-1 students at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign 1988-2000.

BACKGROUND: All medical schools must counsel poor-performing students, address their problems and assist them in developing into competent physicians. The objective of this study was to determine whether students with academic deficiencies in their M-1 year graduate more often, spend less time to complete the curriculum, and need fewer attempts at passing USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 by entering the Decompressed Program prior to failure of the M-1 year than those students who fail the M-1 year and then repeat it. METHOD: The authors reviewed the performance of M-1 students in the Decompressed Program and compared their outcomes to M-1 students who failed and fully repeated the M-1 year. To compare the groups upon admission, t-Tests comparing the Cognitive Index of students and MCAT scores from both groups were performed. Performance of the two groups after matriculation was also analyzed. RESULTS: Decompressed students were 2.1 times more likely to graduate. Decompressed students were 2.5 times more likely to pass USMLE Step 1 on the first attempt than the repeat students. In addition, 46% of those in the decompressed group completed the program in five years compared to 18% of the repeat group. CONCLUSION: Medical students who decompress their M-1 year prior to M-1 year failure outperform those who fail their first year and then repeat it. These findings indicate the need for careful monitoring of M-1 student performance and early intervention and counseling of struggling students.