MatricS-A novel tool for monitoring professional role development in surgical disciplines.

Introduction: Mentoring is an effective method for human resource development. Monitoring the process is important for individual mentee/mentor pairs as well as for program directors. Due to individual personality differences of both mentees and mentors and their respective interactions, it is challenging to monitor the individual development process of mentees in a structured manner. This study investigates to what extent a novel instrument, the mentee-based assessment tool for role development of interpersonal competencies in surgical professions (MatricS) can adequately monitor the professional role development process of residents during an established mentoring program. Material and methods: In a prospective longitudinal study, the competence development of 31 mentees in two subsequent cohorts was assessed by a modified role matrix based on Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists. The evaluation focused on three defined roles (D, developer; N, networker; M, multiplicator) at three levels (private, employer-related, national/international) with four stages of development. For validation of mentee self-assessments, the assessments of the respective mentors were recorded alongside. For correlation analyses, Pearson coefficients were calculated, pre-post-comparisons were done by paired t-tests; significance was assumed at p < 0.05, respectively. Results: Mentee self-assessments overall correlated well with the objective mentor assessments (Pearson's r 0.8, p < 0.001). Significant correlations of this magnitude were found for both individual cohorts as well as for all individual roles. The mentees acquired competencies in all roles indicated by significant increases of corresponding MatricS scores. The largest competency gains (mean ± SD) were found in the role D (start: 1.30 ± 0.77, end: 2.13 ± 0.83, p < 0.001). The majority of mentees achieved the prespecified target competency level in >75% of all roles and levels. Conclusion: The role development process during mentoring can be reliably monitored by using MatricS. MatricS scores highly correlate between mentees and mentors, indicating that mentee self-assessments are suitable and sufficient for monitoring. These findings help to lessen the work burden on senior surgeons and thus can help to increase the acceptance of mentoring programs in surgical disciplines.

A primer of an in-depth resilience status for German medical graduates: results of a cross-sectional survey on the status quo of resilience among graduates of human medicine in Bavaria, Germany - a necessary step in building an emotionally equipped healthcare work-force.

BACKGROUND: Resilience is a widely-used catchword in the last couple of years to describe the resistance to psychological strains of life, especially for the healthcare work-force. The promises of resilience to burnout sound great and what we all would want: less health impairment despite stress, higher work satisfaction and last but not least higher work performance. There is research that shows that students and physicians have high emotional distress and low resilience, yet comparably little is known which aspects of resilience are exactly impaired in the upcoming work-force. With our study we investigated the in-depth resilience status of medical graduates from five medical schools within their first year after graduation. In this, additionally to assessing the resilience status as a whole we investigate the answers on the singular items and the relationship of the resilience status with neighboring constructs. METHODS: In 2018, 1610 human medical graduates from five Bavarian medical schools were asked to take part at cross-sectional Bavarian graduate survey (Bayerische Absolventenstudie Medizin, MediBAS). The response rate was 38,07, 60% of the participants were female. For the identification of the in-depth resilience status we included the 5-point Likert 10-Item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, German Version in a graduate survey posted to 5 medical schools and over 1610 eligible participants of whom 610 (60% female) filled out at least parts of the survey. To identify relationships to other aspects we posed further questionnaires. RESULTS: The resilience status showed a mean resilience score of M = 37.1 (SD = 6.30). The score ranges from 3.22 (I am not easily discouraged by failure) to 4.26 (I am able to adapt to change). One third of the participants chose not to answer the item "I am able to handle unpleasant feeling". Relationships to job satisfaction, scientific competence and stress are presented in the article. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the overall resilience status of medical graduates one year after their graduation is rather high, but subjectively they do not feel equivalently resilient for the different aspects they face in their job. Especially, how to handle their emotions seems to be challenging for some of the young physicians. In the article we sketch ideas how to handle the specific training needs the study has identified.

[Mentoring in urological postgraduate training : Use of a competence matrix for the evaluation of results]. / Mentoring in der urologischen Weiterbildung : Einsatz einer Kompetenzmatrix zur Ergebnisevaluation.

OBJECTIVES: For the professional development of junior employees, sufficient competence is decisive for their career. The mentoring programme Urology Roadmap provides residents career planning in various roles (junior staff member, developer, networker, multiplier). To date, no data are available on the extent to which the role matrix instrument is suitable as a competence matrix for evaluating results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective longitudinal study, the competence development of 21 mentees was recorded by their mentors in a validated questionnaire (The Munich Evaluation of Mentoring Questionnaire, MEMeQ). A modified role matrix based on CanMEDs (Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists) was used as an assessment tool. The focus of the evaluation was on four defined roles at three levels (private, employer-related, (inter)national) with four development stages. RESULTS: The highest level of satisfaction was found for the aspect "successful design of the career path" (93%) and the lowest was found for the aspect "facilitation of everyday working life" (67%). In all, 93% recommend participation. The mentees achieved significant increases in competence in all four roles. The highest level of competence was found in the role of junior employee (mstart 1.3 ± 0.7, mend 2.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), followed by developer (mstart 1.2 ± 0.8, mend 2.2 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and networker (mstart 1.3 ± 0.7, mend 2.1 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Of the mentees, 54% were able to achieve the target competence level 2 in more than 90% of all roles and levels. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument role matrix is suitable to objectively evaluate the results of the mentoring programme and reflects the state of personnel development.