Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(12): 7098-7104, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27645244

ABSTRACT

In this study we sought to evaluate narlaprevir (NVR) pharmacokinetics (PK) after a single dose with or without ritonavir (RTV) in cirrhotic versus healthy subjects. NVR at 200 mg was administered to 8 healthy and 8 cirrhotic subjects, and NVR at 100 mg with RTV at 100 mg was administered to 8 healthy and 8 cirrhotic subjects. PK analysis was performed. The geometric mean maximum concentration of a drug in serum (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) were 563.1 ng/ml and 4,701.8 ng · h/ml in cirrhotic patients versus 364.8 ng/ml and 1,917.1 ng · h/ml in healthy volunteers, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of the PK parameters of cirrhotic subjects to healthy volunteers were 1.54-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 2.27) for Cmax and 2.45-fold (90% CI = 1.56 to 3.85) for AUC0-∞ The geometric mean Cmax and AUC0-∞ in cirrhotic and healthy subjects were similar: 1,225.7 ng/ml for Cmax and 15,213.1 ng · h/ml for AUC0-∞ in cirrhotic subjects and 1,178.9 ng/ml for Cmax and 14,257.2 ng · h/ml for AUC0-∞ in healthy volunteers. The corresponding geometric mean ratios were 1.04 (90% CI = 0.67 to 1.62) for Cmax and 1.07 (90% CI = 0.72 to 1.58) for AUC0-∞ Higher exposures in cirrhotic subjects were safe and well tolerated. We found that NVR exposures after a 200-mg single dose were higher in cirrhotic subjects than in healthy subjects and that a 100-mg single dose of NVR boosted with RTV at 100 mg resulted in no significant PK differences between cirrhotic and healthy subjects.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dipeptides/administration & dosage , Dipeptides/pharmacokinetics , Ritonavir/pharmacokinetics , Sulfones/administration & dosage , Sulfones/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Cyclopropanes , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Urea , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors
2.
Georgian Med News ; (122): 25-9, 2005 May.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15988077

ABSTRACT

In developed countries chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the main reasons of death and physical disability. CHF affects approximately 1-2% of the population and its prevalence is still increasing. Today ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics are the first line drugs in treatment of CHF. Mildronate is a new drug optimizing cardiac energy metabolism and could be an effective approach in CHF patients' management. The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mildronate in treatment of CHF (NYHA III-IV funct. class) patients. 110 patients with CHF, stable on conventional treatment (diuretics, ACE inhibitors, beta-blokers, digoxin), were treated additionally with mildronate. Assessment was performed with clinical data, FC change, ECO-cardiography, 6-minute walk test. Mildronate showed to be an effective drug in complex treatment of chronic heart failure.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Output, Low/drug therapy , Methylhydrazines/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Methylhydrazines/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...