ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Current resuscitation guidelines recommend target chest compression depth (CCd) of approximately 4cm for infants and 5cm for children. Previous reports based on chest CT suggest these recommended CCd targets might be too deep for younger children. Our aim was to examine measurements of anterior-posterior chest diameter (APd) with a laser distance meter and calculate CCd targets in critically ill infants and children. DESIGN: A retrospective descriptive study. SETTING: Single-center PICU, using data from May 2019 to May 2022. PATIENTS: All critically ill children admitted to PICU and under 8 years old were eligible to be included in the retrospective cohort. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The chest APd measurements using a laser distance meter are part of our usual practice on the PICU. Target CCd and the over-compression threshold CCd for each age group was calculated as 1/3 and 1/2 of APd, respectively. In 555 patients, the median (interquartile range) of the calculated target CCd for each age group was: 2.7 cm (2.5-2.9 cm), 2.9 cm (2.7-3.2 cm), 3.2 cm (3-3.5 cm), 3.4 cm (3.2-3.6 cm), 3.4 cm (3.2-3.6 cm), 3.6 cm (3.4-3.8 cm), 3.6 cm (3.4-4 cm), and 4 cm (3.5-4.2 cm), for 0, 2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-11, 12-17, 18-23, 24 to less than 60, and 60 to less than 96 months, respectively. Using guideline-recommended absolute CCd targets, 4 cm for infants and 5 cm for children, 49% of infants between 0 and 2 months, and 45.5% of children between 12 and 17 months would be over-compressed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, the 1/3 CCd targets calculated from APd measured by laser meter were shallower than the guideline-recommended CCd. Further studies including evaluating hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with these shallower CCd targets are needed.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The telemedicine intensive care unit (Tele-ICU) is defined as a system in which intensive care professionals remotely provide care to critically ill patients and support the on-site staff in the intensive care unit (ICU) using secured audio-video and electronic links. Although the Tele-ICU is expected to resolve the shortage of intensivists and reduce the regional disparities in intensive care resources, the efficacy has not yet been evaluated in Japan because of a lack of clinically available system. METHODS: This was a single-center, historical comparison study in which the impact of the Tele-ICU on ICU performance and changes in workload of the on-site staff were evaluated. The Tele-ICU system developed in the United States was used. Data for 893 adult ICU patients before the Tele-ICU implementation and for all adult patients registered in the Tele-ICU system from April 2018 to March 2020 were abstracted and included. We investigated ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay and ventilation duration after the Tele-ICU implementation in each ICU, and compared between pre and post implementation and changes over time. We also assessed physician workload as defined by the frequency and duration of access to the electronic medical record (EMR) of the targeted ICU patients. RESULTS: After the Tele-ICU implementation 5438 patients were included. In unadjusted data pre/post study showed significant decreases in ICU (8.5-3.8%) and hospital (12.4-7.7%) mortality and ICU length of stay (p < 0.001), and those values were maintained for 2 years. In data stratified by predicted hospital mortality, ICU and hospital actual mortality in high and medium risk patients decreased significantly after the implementation. Ventilation duration was shortened (p < 0.007). Access frequency of the on-site physicians decreased by 25%, and the decrease occurred in the daytime shift and in the physicians with 3-15 years of work experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the Tele-ICU implementation was associated with lower mortality, especially in medium and high risk patients, and decreased EMR-related tasks of on-site physicians. These results suggest that the Tele-ICU could be a solution of the shortage of intensivists and regional disparities for intensive care.
ABSTRACT
Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the pooled effects of higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) failed to show significantly reduced mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Some new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported and an updated systematic review is needed to evaluate the use of higher PEEP in patients with ARDS. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi, ICTRP, the National Institute of Health Clinical Trials Register, and the reference list of recent guidelines. We included RCTs to compare the higher PEEP ventilation strategy with the lower strategy in patients with ARDS. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of the studies and extracted the data. The primary outcomes were 28-day mortality. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Among the 6530 screened records, 16 randomized trials involving 4150 patients were included in our meta-analysis. When comparing higher PEEP versus lower PEEP, the pooled risk ratio (RR) for 28-day mortality was 0.85 (15 studies, n=4108, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.00, I2=58%, low certainty of evidence). Subgroup analysis by study participants with a low tidal volume (LTV) strategy showed an interaction (P for interaction, 0.001). Our study showed that in patients with ARDS, the use of higher PEEP did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality compared to the use of lower PEEP.
