ABSTRACT
Proteinuria, developing after renal transplantation may influence allograft and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of proteinuria on patient and allograft survival. Among 514 patients, 56 (11%) patients with good allograft function and proteinuria were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with proteinuria were classified as group P (20 patients with permanent proteinuria, Male/Female: 16/4) and group T (36 patients with temporary proteinuria, M/F: 29/7) according to the type of proteinuria. Also, considering the amount of proteinuria, patients were classified as group M (32 patients with massive proteinuria, M/F: 29/3) and group NM (24 patients with non-massive proteinuria, M/F: 16/8). The mean time interval between transplantation and appearance of proteinuria was 23.7 months (range 0-121 months) and no difference was found between groups. Two- and 5-yr allograft survival rates were found to be 85 and 80% in group M, and 95 and 82% in group NM. respectively (p = 0.24). In terms of type of proteinuria, 2- and 5-yr allograft survival rates were found to be 70 and 58% in group P and 92 and 87% in group T, respectively. The difference between groups P and T was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02). Most (85%) of the patients with permanent proteinuria also had massive proteinuria. In conclusion, we found a significant relation between type and severity of proteinuria. The type of post-transplant proteinuria had a stronger effect on allograft outcome than the severity of proteinuria.
Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Proteinuria/etiology , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this study, renal transplant recipients with tuberculosis of different organs, were retrospectively analysed with respect to prevalence, outcome and drug toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 520 patients, 22 (4.2%) tuberculosis of various organs was diagnosed. The time interval between transplantation and diagnosis of tuberculosis was 44.4 +/- 33.5 (range 3-111) months. In 18 (82%) of the patients, tuberculosis was detected after the first year of transplantation. The most common form was pleuro/pulmonary tuberculosis (54%), and other localizations included jejunum, liver, bone, and urogenital tract. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 22 patients responded favourably to the treatment and maintain excellent allograft function, whereas six patients (27.2%) died. Toxic hepatitis was seen in four (18%) patients, and one case was complicated with acute hepatocellular failure due to isoniazide (INH). However, of the 23 patients at risk of tuberculosis who had had INH prophylaxis for 1 year, neither tuberculosis, nor hepatotoxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Tuberculosis is a common infection of renal transplant recipients in developing countries. The peak incidence is after the first year of transplantation and mortality is considerable. Hepatoxicity is a considerable risk of treatment, possibly as a result of additive toxic effects of immunosuppressive drugs.