Prediction of coronary artery bypass graft outcomes using a single surgical note: An artificial intelligence-based prediction model study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers currently calculate risk of the composite outcome of morbidity or mortality associated with a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery through manual input of variables into a logistic regression-based risk calculator. This study indicates that automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques can instead calculate risk. Specifically, we present novel numerical embedding techniques that enable NLP (natural language processing) models to achieve higher performance than the risk calculator using a single preoperative surgical note. METHODS: The most recent preoperative surgical consult notes of 1,738 patients who received an isolated CABG from July 1, 2014 to November 1, 2022 at a single institution were analyzed. The primary outcome was the Society of Thoracic Surgeons defined composite outcome of morbidity or mortality (MM). We tested three numerical-embedding techniques on the widely used TextCNN classification model: 1a) Basic embedding, treat numbers as word tokens; 1b) Basic embedding with a dataloader that Replaces out-of-context (ROOC) numbers with a tag, where context is defined as within a number of tokens of specified keywords; 2) ScaleNum, an embedding technique that scales in-context numbers via a learned sigmoid-linear-log function; and 3) AttnToNum, a ScaleNum-derivative that updates the ScaleNum embeddings via multi-headed attention applied to local context. Predictive performance was measured via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on holdout sets from 10 random-split experiments. For eXplainable-AI (X-AI), we calculate SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values at an ngram resolution (SHAP-N). While the analyses focus on TextCNN, we execute an analogous performance pipeline with a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to test if the numerical embedding advantage is robust to model architecture. RESULTS: A total of 567 (32.6%) patients had MM following CABG. The embedding performances are as follows with the TextCNN architecture: 1a) Basic, mean AUC 0.788 [95% CI (confidence interval): 0.768-0.809]; 1b) ROOC, 0.801 [CI: 0.788-0.815]; 2) ScaleNum, 0.808 [CI: 0.785-0.821]; and 3) AttnToNum, 0.821 [CI: 0.806-0.834]. The LSTM architecture produced a similar trend. Permutation tests indicate that AttnToNum outperforms the other embedding techniques, though not statistically significant verse ScaleNum (p-value of .07). SHAP-N analyses indicate that the model learns to associate low blood urine nitrate (BUN) and creatinine values with survival. A correlation analysis of the attention-updated numerical embeddings indicates that AttnToNum learns to incorporate both number magnitude and local context to derive semantic similarities. CONCLUSION: This research presents both quantitative and clinical novel contributions. Quantitatively, we contribute two new embedding techniques: AttnToNum and ScaleNum. Both can embed strictly positive and bounded numerical values, and both surpass basic embeddings in predictive performance. The results suggest AttnToNum outperforms ScaleNum. With regards to clinical research, we show that AI methods can predict outcomes after CABG using a single preoperative note at a performance that matches or surpasses the current risk calculator. These findings reveal the potential role of NLP in automated registry reporting and quality improvement.

Changes in heart transplant outcomes of elderly patients in the new allocation era.

OBJECTIVE: Studies demonstrate that heart transplantation can be performed safely in septuagenarians. We evaluate the outcomes of septuagenarians undergoing heart transplantation after the US heart allocation change in 2018. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify heart transplant recipients aged 70 years or more between 2010 and 2021. Primary outcomes were 90-day and 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox proportional hazards, and accelerated failure time models were used for unadjusted and risk-adjusted analyses. RESULTS: A total of 27,403 patients underwent heart transplantation, with 1059 (3.9%) aged 70 years or more. Patients aged 70 years or more increased from 3.7% before 2018 to 4.5% after 2018 (P = .003). Patients aged 70 years or more before 2018 had comparable 90-day and 1-year survivals relative to patients aged less than 70 years (90 days: 93.8% vs 94.2%, log-rank P = .650; 1 year: 89.4% vs 91.1%, log-rank P = .130). After 2018, septuagenarians had lower 90-day and 1-year survivals (90 days: 91.4% vs 95.0%, log-rank P = .021; 1 year: 86.5% vs 90.9%, log-rank P = .018). Risk-adjusted analysis showed comparable 90-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.29; 0.94-1.76, P = .110) but worse 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.32; 1.03-1.68, P = .028) before policy change. After policy change, both 90-day and 1-year mortalities were higher (90 days: HR, 1.99; 1.23-3.22, P = .005; 1 year: hazard ratio, 1.71; 1.14-2.56, P = .010). An accelerated failure time model showed comparable 90-day (0.42; 0.16-1.44; P = .088) and 1-year (0.48; 0.18-1.26; P = .133) survival postallocation change. CONCLUSIONS: Septuagenarians comprise a greater proportion of heart transplant recipients after the allocation change, and their post-transplant outcomes relative to younger recipients have worsened.

Heart Transplantation for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Can Be Performed at Adult or Pediatric Hospitals With Comparable Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hospital-related factors and hospital type on outcomes of heart transplantation for patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). METHODS: Patients with ACHD who underwent heart transplant between 2010 and 2021 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing data registry. The primary outcome was post-transplant mortality. Kaplan-Meier unadjusted survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used for risk-adjustment in evaluating the independent effect of hospital type on post-transplant mortality. RESULTS: Of 70 centers, 54 (77.1%) adult centers performed 415 (87.0%) heart transplants and 16 (22.9%) pediatric centers performed 62 (13.0%) heart transplants. Patients transplanted at pediatric centers were younger, had lower creatinine levels, and had lower body mass index. The unadjusted 1-y and 5-y survival was comparable in pediatric versus adult centers, respectively: 93.4% versus 86.6% (log-rank P = 0.16) and 87.4% versus 73.9% (log-rank P = 0.06). These findings persisted after risk-adjustment. One-year mortality hazard ratio for pediatric hospitals: 0.64 (0.22-1.89, P = 0.416) and 5-y mortality hazard ratio for pediatric hospitals: 0.53 (0.21-1.33, P = 0.175). Rates of acute rejection, postoperative stroke, and new-onset postoperative dialysis were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplantation for patients with ACHD can be performed safely in adult centers. The majority of heart transplant for ACHD in the United States are performed at adult hospitals. However, further research is needed to delineate the impact of individual surgeon characteristics and hospital-related factors on outcomes.

Patient Characteristics and Early Clinical Outcomes With Impella 5.5: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Data regarding outcomes with Impella 5.5 are limited. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize patient and treatment characteristics and early clinical outcomes among patients supported by Impella 5.5. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from September 2019 to March 2023. Studies reporting outcomes in greater than or equal to 5 patients were included for review. Patient characteristics, treatment characteristics, and early clinical outcomes were extracted. Outcomes included adverse events, survival to hospital discharge, and 30 day survival. Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled effects for survival outcomes. Assessment for bias was performed using funnel plots and Egger's tests. Fifteen studies were included for qualitative review, representing 707 patients. Mean duration of support was 9.9 ± 8.2 days. On meta-analysis of 13 studies reporting survival outcomes, survival to hospital discharge was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58-78%), and 30 day survival was 65% (95% CI, 56-74%) among patients with Impella devices predominantly supported by Impella 5.5 (>60%). There was significant study heterogeneity for these outcomes. Among 294 patients with Impella 5.5 only, survival to discharge was 78% (95% CI, 72-82%) with no significant study heterogeneity. This data present early benchmarks for outcomes with Impella 5.5 as clinical experience with these devices accrues.

Risk Factors for 1-Year Mortality After Heart Transplant in Obese Patients Bridged With an LVAD.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is relatively contraindicated in morbidly obese patients because of increased morbidity and mortality. This study identified risk factors for post-heart transplantation mortality in obese patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify patients with a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 who had a durable LVAD at the time of isolated heart transplantation between 2010 and 2021. The primary outcome was post-heart transplantation 1-year mortality. Multivariable Cox regression modeling was used to identify significant risk factors for 1-year mortality. Receiver-operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify optimal thresholds for continuous variables associated with the primary outcome. Patients were stratified by the number of risk factors, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare survival. RESULTS: A total of 1222 obese patients were bridged to heart transplantation with a durable LVAD. Six risk factors were identified as significantly associated with 1-year post-heart transplantation mortality: recipient age >62.5 years, body mass index >36.6 kg/m2, bilirubin level >0.95 mg/dL, cold ischemic time >3.7 hours, recipient-donor sex mismatch, and pretransplantation mechanical ventilation. The distribution of cumulative risk factors was as follows: 8.6% with 0, 30.6% with 1, 37.0% with 2, and 23.8% patients with ≥3 risk factors. The 1-year survival rate decreased significantly from 96.0% in those patients with 0 risk factors to 77.6% in those with 3 or more risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide a useful guide for risk stratification and patient selection in obese LVAD candidates being considered for heart transplantation.

Donor utilization in heart transplant with donation after circulatory death in the United States.

Heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) was recently adopted in the United States. This study aimed to characterize organ yield from adult (≥18 years) DCD heart donors in the United States using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. The registry does not identify potential donors who do not progress to circulatory death, and only those who progressed to death were included for analysis. Outcomes included organ recovery from the donor operating room and organ utilization for transplant. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of heart recovery and utilization. Among 558 DCD procurements, recovery occurred in 89.6%, and 92.5% of recovered hearts were utilized for transplant. Of 506 DCD procurements with available data, 65.0% were classified as direct procurement and perfusion and 35.0% were classified as normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Logistic regression identified that NRP, shorter agonal time, younger donor age, and highest volume of organ procurement organizations were independently associated with increased odds for heart recovery. NRP independently predicted heart utilization after recovery. DCD heart utilization in the United States is satisfactory and consistent with international experience. NRP procurements have a higher yield for DCD heart transplantation compared with direct procurement and perfusion, which may reflect differences in donor assessment and acceptance criteria.

Quality and Impact of Manuscripts Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Databases.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Databases contain the largest and most comprehensive cardiac, thoracic, and congenital surgery data available. In this analysis characteristics of manuscripts that used the STS National Databases were examined to evaluate the quality and impact of these publications. METHODS: Manuscripts published from 2010 to 2020 that used the STS National Databases (Adult Cardiac, General Thoracic, and Congenital Heart Surgery) were examined. The number of times cited per published manuscript, journal of publication, and journal CiteScore were assessed. Author characteristics, including institutional association and h-index, were evaluated for first and last authors. RESULTS: Of 539 published manuscripts, 179 (33.2%) used the Adult Cardiac Surgery, 128 (23.7%) the Congenital Heart Surgery, 85 (15.8%) the General Thoracic Surgery, and 136 (25.2%) used unspecified STS National Databases. Collectively the analyzed manuscripts were cited 18,943 times, with a mean of 35.1 (range, 0-528) citations per manuscript. Manuscripts were published in 97 journals with a mean year-adjusted CiteScore of 5.6 (range, 0.1-60.2). Authors associated with 361 institutions contributed to published manuscripts. The mean h-index of first authors was 24.6 (range, 0-100) and of last authors was 44.1 (range, 0-164). From 2010 to 2020 first authors wrote a mean of 1.6 (range, 1-31) and last authors wrote a mean of 1.9 (range, 1-29) STS National Databases publications. CONCLUSIONS: The STS National Databases are some of the most robust data collection sources available to cardiothoracic surgeons. These data have enabled valuable research in respected journals from authors of varying experience levels.

Trends and Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney and Heart-Lung Transplantation Over the Past Two Decades.

INTRODUCTION: Combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKTx) and combined heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) remain the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure with concomitant end-stage renal or lung failure. We sought to study trends and outcomes of HKTx and HLTx over the last two decades. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify all adult patients (aged >18 y) who underwent HKTx and HLTx between 2001 and 2021. Patients were divided into 5-y groups by the year of transplantation (2001-2006, 2007-2011, 2012-2016, and 2017-2021). Primary outcome was 1-y posttransplantation mortality. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used for unadjusted and risk-adjusted survival analyses, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 2301 HKTx and 567 HLTx patients were included. Between 2001 and 2021, HKTx volume increased from 25 to 344 patients (P < 0.001) and centers performing HKTx increased from 19 to 76 (P < 0.001). On unadjusted analysis, 1-y survival after HKTx improved from 86.7% in 2001-2006 to 89.0% in 2017-2021 (log-rank, P = 0.005). On risk-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio of 1-y mortality for 2017-2021 was 0.62 (0.39-1.00, P = 0.048) compared with that for 2001-2006. Between 2001 and 2021, HLTx volume increased from 21 to 43 patients (P < 0.001) and centers performing HLTx increased from 12 to 20 (P = 0.047). On unadjusted analysis, 1-y survival after HLTx improved from 68.9% in 2001-2006 to 83.9% in 2017-2021 (log-rank, P = 0.600). On risk-adjusted analysis, the hazard ratio of 1-y mortality for 2017-2021 was 0.37 (0.21-0.67, P = 0.001) compared with that for 2001-2006. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last two decades, HKTx volume substantially increased and HLTx experienced resurgent growth. One-year survival persistently improved for both procedures, especially over the past 5 y.

A multicenter evaluation of the HeartMate 3 risk score.

BACKGROUND: The Heartmate 3 (HM3) risk score (HM3RS) was derived and validated internally from within the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) trial population and provides 1- and 2-year mortality risk prediction for patients in those before HM3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We aimed to evaluate the HM3RS in nontrial unselected patients, including those not meeting inclusion criteria for MOMENTUM 3 trial enrollment. METHODS: Patients who underwent HM3 LVAD implant at 1 of 7 US centers between 2017 and 2021, with at least 1-year follow-up, were included in this analysis. Patients were retrospectively assessed for their eligibility for the MOMENTUM 3 trial based on study inclusion and exclusion criteria. HM3RS risk discrimination was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for 1-year mortality for all patients and further stratified by MOMENTUM 3 trial eligibility. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed using the HM3RS-based risk categories. RESULTS: Of 521 patients included in the analysis, 266 (51.1%) would have met enrollment criteria for MOMENTUM 3. The 1- and 2-year survival for the total cohort was 85% and 81%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between those who met and did not meet enrollment criteria at 1 (87% vs 83%; p = 0.21) and 2 years postimplant (80% vs 78%; p = 0.39). For the total cohort, HM3RS predicted 1-year survival with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.69, p < 0.001). HM3RS performed better in the subset of patients meeting enrollment criteria: AUC 0.69 (95% CI:0.61-0.77, p < 0.001) compared to the subset that did not: AUC 0.58 (95% CI: 0.49-0.66, p = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world evidence, multicenter cohort, 1- and 2-year survival after commercial HM3 LVAD implant was excellent, regardless of trial eligibility. The HM3RS provided adequate risk discrimination in "trial-like" patients, but predictive value was reduced in patients who did not meet trial criteria.

Waitlist and transplant outcomes in heart transplant candidates bridged with temporary endovascular right ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Advances in mechanical circulatory support and changes in allocation policy have shifted waitlisting practices for heart transplantation (HT) in the United States. This analysis reports waitlist and transplant outcomes among HT candidates bridged with temporary endovascular right ventricular assist devices (tRVADs). METHODS: Patients awaiting HT from 2008 to 2022 in the United Network of Organ Sharing registry were grouped by the presence of tRVAD while waitlisted and propensity matched. Waitlist outcomes were HT and a competing outcome of death/deterioration requiring waitlist inactivation. Competing-risks regression was used to model waitlist outcomes. Subanalyses were performed to compare waitlist outcomes among patients with durable and temporary left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) with and without concomitant tRVADs. One-year posttransplant mortality was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of 41,507 HT candidates, 133 (0.3%) had tRVADs. After propensity matching, patients with tRVAD had a similar likelihood of HT and an elevated hazard for death/deterioration (hazard ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.2, p < 0.001) compared to those without tRVAD. Most patients with tRVAD (84%) had concomitant LVADs. tRVAD was associated with an elevated risk for deterioration/death among those with temporary LVADs but not durable LVADs. For patients undergoing HT, tRVAD was associated with an increased risk for 1-year mortality compared to propensity-matched recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Bridging with tRVAD is uncommon and primarily used in patients requiring biventricular support. tRVADs are associated with waitlist inactivation or death, particularly with concomitant temporary LVAD support. As temporary devices are increasingly used as a bridge to HT, outcomes of patients with tRVADs should inform future allocation policy, particularly for candidates with biventricular failure.

Right Ventricular Contractility and Pulmonary Arterial Coupling After Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Right ventricular failure contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation. Recent data suggest a less invasive strategy (LIS) via thoracotomy may be associated with less right ventricular failure than conventional median sternotomy (CMS). However, the impact of these approaches on load-independent right ventricular (RV) contractility and RV-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling remains uncertain. We hypothesized that the LIS approach would be associated with preserved RV contractility and improved RV-PA coupling compared with CMS. We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent durable, centrifugal left ventricular assist device implantation and had paired hemodynamic assessments before and after implantation. RV contractility (end-systolic elastance [Ees]), RV afterload (pulmonary effective arterial elastance [Ea]), and RV-PA coupling (Ees/Ea) were determined using digitized RV pressure waveforms. Forty-two CMS and 21 LIS patients were identified. Preimplant measures of Ees, Ea, and Ees/Ea were similar between groups. After implantation, Ees declined significantly in the CMS group (0.60-0.40, p = 0.008) but not in the LIS group (0.67-0.58, p = 0.28). Coupling (Ees/Ea) was unchanged in CMS group (0.54-0.59, p = 0.80) but improved significantly in the LIS group (0.58-0.71, p = 0.008). LIS implantation techniques may better preserve RV contractility and improve RV-PA coupling compared with CMS.

Outcomes of Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation in Older Recipients.

Objectives: The upper limit of recipient age for combined heart-kidney transplantation (HKT) remains controversial. This study evaluated the outcomes of HKT in patients aged ≥65 years. Methods: The United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) was used to identify patients undergoing HKT from 2005 to 2021. Patients were stratified by age at transplantation: <65 and ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome was one-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and 5-year mortality, postoperative new-onset dialysis, postoperative stroke, acute rejection prior to discharge, and rejection within one-year of HKT. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk adjustment for mortality was performed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: HKT in recipients aged ≥65 significantly increased from 5.6% of all recipients in 2005 to 23.7% in 2021 (p=0.002). Of 2,022 HKT patients in the study period, 372 (18.40%) were aged ≥65. Older recipients were more likely to be male and white, and fewer required dialysis prior to HKT. There were no differences between cohorts in unadjusted 90-day, 1-year, or 5-year survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis. These findings persisted after risk-adjustment, with an adjusted hazard for one-year mortality for age ≥65 of 0.91 (95% CI (0.63-1.29), p=0.572). As a continuous variable, increasing age was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.01 (95% CI (1.00-1.02), p=0.236) per year). Patients aged ≥65 more frequently required new-onset dialysis prior to discharge (11.56% vs. 7.82%, p=0.051). Stroke and rejection rates were comparable. Conclusion: Combined HKT is increasing in older recipients, and advanced age ≥65 should not preclude HKT.

Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Organ Donation After Circulatory Death: Trends in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize waitlist and transplant outcomes in kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation using organ donation after circulatory death (DCD). BACKGROUND: DCD has expanded the donor pool for solid organ transplantation, most recently for heart transplantation. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult transplant candidates and recipients in the most recent allocation policy eras for kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation. Transplant candidates and recipients were grouped by acceptance criteria for DCD versus brain-dead donors [donation after brain death (DBD)] only and DCD versus DBD transplant, respectively. Propensity matching and competing-risks regression was used to model waitlist outcomes. Survival was modeled using propensity matching and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: DCD transplant volumes have increased significantly across all organs. Liver candidates listed for DCD organs were more likely to undergo transplantation compared with propensity-matched candidates listed for DBD only, and heart and liver transplant candidates listed for DCD were less likely to experience death or clinical deterioration requiring waitlist inactivation. Propensity-matched DCD recipients demonstrated an increased mortality risk up to 5 years after liver and kidney transplantation and up to 3 years after lung transplantation compared with DBD. There was no difference in 1-year mortality between DCD and DBD heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: DCD continues to expand access to transplantation and improves waitlist outcomes for liver and heart transplant candidates. Despite an increased risk for mortality with DCD kidney, liver, and lung transplantation, survival with DCD transplant remains acceptable.

Impact of Donor Hemodynamics on Recipient Survival in Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is the gold-standard therapy for end-stage heart failure, but rates of donor-heart use remain low due to various factors that are often not evidence based. The impact of donor hemodynamics obtained via right-heart catheterization on recipient survival remains unclear. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify donors and recipients from September 1999-December 2019. Donor hemodynamics data were obtained and analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistical regression, with the primary endpoints being 1- and 5-year post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Of the 85,333 donors who consented to heart transplantation during the study period, 6573 (7.7%) underwent right-heart catheterization, of whom 5531 eventually underwent procurement and transplantation. Donors were more likely to undergo right-heart catheterization if they had high-risk criteria. Recipients who had donor hemodynamic assessment had 1- and 5-year survival rates similar to those without donor hemodynamic assessment (87% vs 86%, 1 year). Abnormal hemodynamics were common in donor hearts but did not impact recipient survival rates, even when risk-adjusted in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Donors with abnormal hemodynamics may represent an opportunity to expand the pool of viable donor hearts.

Impact of adverse events on health-related quality of life after left ventricular assist device implantation: An STS INTERMACS analysis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to quantify the impact of pre- and postoperative variables on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: Primary durable LVAD implants between 2012 and 2019 in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support were identified. Multivariable modeling using general linear models assessed the impact of baseline characteristics and postimplant adverse events (AEs) on HRQOL as assessed by the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ) at 6 months and 3 years. RESULTS: Of 22,230 patients, 9,888 had VAS and 10,552 had KCCQ reported at 6 months, and 2,170 patients had VAS and 2,355 had KCCQ reported at 3 years postimplant. VAS improved from a mean of 38.2 ± 28.3 to 70.7 ± 22.9 at 6 months and from 40.1 ± 27.8 to 70.3 ± 23.1 at 3 years. KCCQ improved from 28.2 ± 23.9 to 64.3 ± 23.2 at 6 months and from 29.8 ± 23.7 to 63.0 ± 23.7 at 3 years. Preimplant variables, including baseline VAS, had small effect sizes on HRQOL while postimplant AEs had large negative effect sizes. Recent stroke, respiratory failure, and renal dysfunction had the largest negative effect on HRQOL at 6 months, while recent renal dysfunction, respiratory failure, and infection had the largest negative effect at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: AEs following LVAD implantation have large negative effects on HRQOL in early and late follow-up. Understanding the impact of AEs on HRQOL may assist shared decision-making regarding LVAD eligibility. Continued efforts to reduce post-LVAD AEs are warranted to improve HRQOL in addition to survival.

Outcomes of reoperative aortic root surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine the impact of reoperative aortic root replacement on short-term outcomes and survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of aortic root operations from 2010 to 2018. All patients with a complete aortic root replacement were included, and patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacements were excluded. Patients were dichotomized by first-time sternotomy versus redo sternotomy, which was defined as having had a prior sternotomy for whatever reason. Within the redo sternotomy group, reoperative aortic root replacements were identified, being defined as a complete aortic root replacement in patients with a prior aortic root replacement; 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity matching was used to compare outcomes across groups. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were generated and compared using log-rank statistics. RESULTS: A total of 893 patients undergoing complete ARR were identified, of whom 595 (67%) underwent first-time sternotomy and 298 (33%) underwent redo sternotomy. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar for the first-time and redo sternotomy groups, including operative mortality. Redo sternotomy was not associated with reduced survival after aortic root replacement compared with first-time sternotomy (P = .084), with 5-year survival of 73.7% for first-time sternotomy and 72.9% for redo sternotomy. In the redo sternotomy group (n = 298), 69 (23%) were reoperative aortic root replacements and 229 (77%) were first-time aortic root replacements. After matching, postoperative outcomes were similar for the first-time and reoperative aortic root replacement groups, including operative mortality. Reoperative aortic root replacement was not associated with reduced survival, compared with first-time aortic root replacement (P = .870), with 5-year survival of 67.9% for first-time aortic root replacement and 72.1% for reoperative aortic root replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative aortic root replacement can be performed safely and provides similar survival to first-time aortic root replacement.

Redo orthotopic heart transplantation in the current era.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the trends, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality after redo orthotopic heart transplantation. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult orthotopic heart transplantation recipients from 2000 to 2020 and stratify into primary and redo cohorts. Five-year post-transplant survival was compared between 2 propensity-matched cohorts. Multivariable modeling was performed to identify risk-adjusted predictors of redo post-transplant mortality, both conditional and nonconditional on shorter-term survival. RESULTS: A total of 40,711 recipients were analyzed, 39,657 (97.4%) primary and 1054 (2.6%) redo. Redo recipients had a lower median age and were more frequently bridged with intravenous inotropes, intra-aortic balloon pump, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (all P < .05). One- and 5-year survivals were lower after redo orthotopic heart transplantation (90.0% vs 83.4% and 77.6% vs 68.6%, respectively) and remained lower after comparing 2 propensity-matched cohorts. Multivariable modeling found factors such as increasing donor age and graft ischemic times, along with pretransplant mechanical ventilation and blood transfusion, to negatively affect 90-day survival. Contingent on 1-year survival, donor factors such as hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.00, P = .004) and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% (hazard ratio, 2.22, 95% confidence interval, 1.16-4.24, P = .016) negatively affected survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequently performed, redo orthotopic heart transplantation remains associated with worse post-transplant outcomes compared with primary orthotopic heart transplantation. Although several high-risk features were identified to affect post-retransplant outcomes in the acute perioperative period, donor characteristics such as hypertension and decreased ejection fraction continue to have lasting negative impacts in the longer term.

Optimal circulatory arrest temperature for aortic hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify the optimal temperature for moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest in patients undergoing elective hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database was queried for elective hemiarch replacements using antegrade brain perfusion for aneurysmal disease (2014-2019). Generalized estimating equations and restricted cubic splines were used to determine the risk-adjusted relationships between temperature as a continuous variable and outcomes. RESULTS: Elective hemiarch replacement with antegrade brain perfusion occurred in 3898 patients at 374 centers with a median nadir temperature of 24.9°C (first quartile, third quartile = 22.0°C, 27.5°C) and median circulatory arrest time of 19 minutes (first quartile, third quartile = 14.0 minutes, 27.0 minutes). After adjustment for comorbidities, circulatory arrest time, and individual surgeon, patients cooled between 25 and 28°C had an early survival advantage compared with 24°C, whereas those cooled between 21 and 23°C had higher risks of mortality compared with 24°C. A nadir temperature of 27°C was associated with the lowest risk-adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.91). A nadir temperature of 21°C had the highest risk of mortality (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.73). Risk of experiencing a major morbidity was elevated in patients cooled between 21 and 23°C, with the highest risk occurring in patients cooled to 21°C (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with aneurysmal disease undergoing elective hemiarch with antegrade brain perfusion, circulatory arrest with a nadir temperature of 27°C confers the greatest early survival benefit and smallest risk of postoperative morbidity.

Complete revascularization during coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with reduced major adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: Complete revascularization literature is limited by variance in patient cohorts and inconsistent definitions. The objective of the current study was to provide risk-adjusted outcomes for complete revascularization of significant nonmain-branch and main-branch vessel stenoses. METHODS: All patients that underwent first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures were included. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, cumulative incidence function, and Cox regression were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: The total population consisted of 3356 patients that underwent first-time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Eight hundred eighty-nine (26.5%) patients had incomplete and 2467 (73.5%) had complete revascularization. For main-branch vessels, 677 (20.2%) patients had incomplete revascularization and 2679 (79.8%) were completely revascularized. Following risk adjustment with inverse probability treatment weighting, all baseline characteristics were balanced (standardized mean difference, ≤ 0.10). On Kaplan-Meier estimates, survival at 1 year (94.6% vs 92.5%) and 5 years (86.5% vs 82.1%) (P = .05) was significantly better for patients who received complete revascularization. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was significantly higher for the complete revascularization cohort at both 1 year (89.2% vs 84.2%) and 5 years (72.5% vs 66.7%) (P < .001). Complete revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.95; P = .01) was independently associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Incomplete revascularization of nonmain-branch vessels was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.8; P = .55) or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.24; P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical revascularization of all angiographically stenotic vessels in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with fewer major adverse events. Incomplete revascularization of nonmain-branch vessels is not associated with survival or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.