Effectiveness of a telehealth patient education intervention for breast cancer awareness and screening uptake among Afghan refugee women: a cross-sectional survey and feasibility study.

Background: Refugee populations have low levels of cancer awareness, low cancer screening rates, and a high rate of advanced or metastatic cancer at diagnosis. Educational interventions to improve cancer awareness and screening have been successful in other nationality refugee populations but have never been implemented in Afghan refugee populations. We aimed to estimate the level of breast cancer awareness among Afghan refugee women and test the feasibility of a telehealth breast cancer educational intervention to increase breast cancer awareness in this population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Afghan refugee women residing in Istanbul, Türkiye who had no personal history of breast cancer and who presented to outpatient primary clinics for care between August 1, 2022, and February 10, 2023 was performed. Participant awareness of breast cancer (BC) was assessed using the validated BC awareness tool, Breast Cancer Awareness Measure (BCAM), during a telehealth encounter. After this baseline assessment, a BC educational intervention was administered to each participant during the telehealth encounter. Six months after the initial assessment and education, a follow-up BCAM was administered via telehealth in order to determine the effectiveness of the education intervention. Findings: One hundred participants were accrued to the study. Median age was 49 years (range: 40-64). All participants had no formal education, were married, and were not employed. Prior to the educational intervention, BC awareness was low; none of the participants were able to identify some common signs/symptoms and risk factors for BC. Prior to the educational intervention, zero participants had ever had a mammogram or seen a physician for a breast-related concern. Six months after the educational intervention, up to 99 percent of participants (99 of 100 participants) were able to correctly identify common signs or symptoms and risk factors for BC. Six months after the educational intervention, all one hundred participants had accepted the offer of a screening mammogram. Interpretation: A telehealth BC education intervention meaningfully increased BC awareness in Afghan refugee women. This increase in BC awareness was associated with a strong increase in completion of BC screening. Further implementation of educational interventions is warranted in order to increase participant awareness and improve screening rates. Funding: Dana Farber Cancer Institute Jay Harris Junior Faculty Research Grant.

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer in Syrian refugees: facing the need for change.

Purpose: To report the utilization of radiation therapy in Syrian refugee patients with prostate cancer residing in Turkey. Methods and materials: A multi-institutional retrospective review including 14 cancer centers in Turkey was conducted to include 137 Syrian refugee patients with prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy (RT). Toxicity data was scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Noncompliance was defined as a patient missing two or more scheduled RT appointments. Results: Advanced disease, defined as stage III or IV, was reported in 64.2% of patients while androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was only administrated to 20% of patients. Conventionally fractionated RT with a median number of 44 fractions was delivered to all patients with curative intent (n = 61) while palliative RT (n = 76) was delivered with a median number of 10 fractions. The acute grade 3-4 toxicity rate for the entire cohort was 16%. Noncompliance rate was 42%. Conclusion: Most Syrian refugee prostate cancer patients presented with advanced disease however ADT was seldom used. Despite the low treatment compliance rate, conventional fractionation was used in all patients. Interventions are critically needed to improve screening and increase the use of standard-of-care treatment paradigms, including hypofractionated RT and ADT.

Implementing failure mode and effect analysis to improve the safety of volumetric modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation.

PURPOSE: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for total body irradiation (VMAT-TBI) is a novel radiotherapy technique that has been implemented at our institution. The purpose of this work is to investigate possible failure modes (FMs) in the treatment process and to develop a quality control (QC) program for VMAT-TBI following TG-100 guidelines. METHODS: We formed a multidisciplinary team to map out the complete treatment process of VMAT-TBI following the AAPM TG-100 guidelines. This process map gives a visual representation of the VMAT-TBI workflow from the CT simulation, image processing, contouring, treatment planning, to treatment delivery. From the process map, potential FMs were identified. The occurrence (O), detectability (D), and severity of impact (S) of each FM were assigned according to scoring criteria (1-10) by the multidisciplinary team. A risk priority number (RPN) was calculated from average O, S, and D of each FM (RPN = O x S x D). High risk FMs were identified as 20% of the FMs having the highest RPN scores. After the FMEA analysis, fault-tree analysis (FTA) was performed for each major step of the treatment process to determine the effects of potential failures to the treatment outcome. Effective QC methods were identified to prevent the high risk failures and to improve the safety of the VMAT-TBI program. RESULTS: We identified a total of 55 sub-processes and 128 FMs from the VMAT-TBI workflow. The top five high-risk FMs were: (1) Prescription and/or OAR constraints changed during planning and not communicated to the planner, (2) Patient moves or breathes too heavily during the upper body CT scan (3) Patient moves during the lower body CT scan, (4) Treatment planning system not calculating total body DVH metrics correctly for TBI, (5) Improper optimization criteria used or not sufficient optimization, resulting in suboptimal dose coverage, OAR sparing or excessive hotspots during treatment planning. Two FMs have average severity scores ≥8: Incorrect PTV subdivision/isocenter placement and Prescription and/or OAR constraints changed during planning and not communicated to the planner. Quality assurance and QC interventions including staff training, standard operating procedures, and quality checklists were implemented based on the FMEA and FTA. CONCLUSION: FM and effect analysis was performed to identify high-risk FMs of our VMAT-TBI program. FMEA and FTA were effective in identifying potential FMs and determining the best quality management (QM) measures to implement in the VMAT-TBI program.

Reconstructive complications and early toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with proton-based postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Background: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) decreases the risk of locoregional recurrence and increases overall survival rates in patients with high-risk node positive breast cancer. While the number of breast cancer patients treated with proton-based PMRT has increased in recent years, there is limited data on the use of proton therapy in the postmastectomy with reconstruction setting. In this study, we compared acute toxicities and reconstructive complications in patients treated with proton-based and photon-based PMRT. Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was performed to identify breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy with implant or autologous reconstruction followed by PMRT from 2015 to 2020. Baseline clinical, disease, and treatment related factors were compared between the photon-based and proton-based PMRT groups. Early toxicity outcomes and reconstructive complications following PMRT were graded by the treating physician. Results: A total of 11 patients treated with proton-based PMRT and 26 patients treated with photon-based PMRT were included with a median follow-up of 7.4 months (range, 0.7-33 months). Six patients (55%) in the proton group had a history of breast cancer (3 ipsilateral and 3 contralateral) and received previous RT 38 months ago (median, range 7-85). There was no significant difference in mean PMRT (p = 0.064) and boost dose (p = 0.608) between the two groups. Grade 2 skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity in both groups (55% and 73% in the proton and photon group, respectively) (p = 0.077). Three patients (27%) in the proton group developed grade 3 skin toxicity. No Grade 4 acute toxicity was reported in either group. Reconstructive complications occurred in 4 patients (36%) in the proton group and 8 patients (31%) in photon group (p = 0.946). Conclusions: Acute skin toxicity remains the most frequent adverse event in both proton- and photon-based PMRT. In our study, reconstructive complications were not significantly higher in patients treated with proton- versus photon-based PMRT. Longer follow-up is warranted to assess late toxicities.

Cancer Diagnoses and Use of Radiation Therapy Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness.

PURPOSE: Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have low rates of cancer screening and worse cancer mortality compared with persons not experiencing homelessness. Data regarding cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are limited. We investigated cancer prevalence and use of radiation therapy (RT) in PEH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients presenting between January 1, 2014, and September 27, 2021, at a large metropolitan hospital system were assessed for homelessness via intake screening or chart search. PEH data were cross-referenced with the institution's cancer database to identify PEH with cancer diagnoses. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were abstracted. RESULTS: Of a total of 9654 (9250 evaluable) PEH with a median age of 42 years, 81 patients (0.88%) had at least 1 cancer diagnosis and 5 had multiple diagnoses, for a total of 87 PEH with at least 1 cancer diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. In total, 43% were female and 51% were Black, and 43% presented with advanced or metastatic disease. Lung (17%), prostate (15%), leukemia/lymphoma (13%), and head/neck (9%) were the most common diagnoses. In total, 17% of patients underwent surgery alone, 13% received chemotherapy alone, 14% received RT alone, and 6% received hormone therapy alone. A total of 8% of patients underwent no treatment, and 43% underwent multimodality therapy. In total, 58% of treated patients never achieved disease-free status. Of the 31 patients who received RT, 87% received external beam RT. Most patients (70%) received hypofractionated regimens. For patients who had multifraction treatment, the treatment completion rate was 85%, significantly lower than the departmental completion rate of 98% (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of PEH in a metropolitan setting, cancer diagnoses were uncommon and were frequently in advanced stages. Most patients underwent single-modality treatment or no treatment at all. Despite the use of hypofractionation, the RT completion rate was low, likely reflecting complex barriers to care. Further interventions to optimize cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are urgently needed.

Early Toxicity and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcomes in Patients Treated With Adjuvant Proton-Based Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the dosimetric data, early toxicity, and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by proton-based RT from 2015 to 2020. Patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were graded as excellent, good, fair, or poor. Early toxicity outcomes were graded by the treating physician during treatment. Dose-volume histograms were reviewed to obtain dosimetry data. RESULTS: We identified 21 patients treated with adjuvant proton-based RT. Median whole breast dose delivered was 46.8 Gy (range, 40.0-50.4 Gy). Target volumes included the regional lymph nodes in 17 patients (81%). Seventeen patients (81%) received a lumpectomy boost. The median planning target volume V95 was 94% (range, 77%-100%), V100 71% (range, 60%-97%), V110 2% (range 0%-18%), and median max point dose was 115% (range, 105%-120%). The median ipsilateral breast V105 was 367.3 cc (range, 0-1172 cc) and V110 was 24.1 cc (range, 0-321.3 cc). Grade 2 and 3 dermatitis occurred in 62% and 14% of patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 pain was reported by 33% and 10% of patients, respectively. Median follow-up at the time of cosmetic evaluation was 27 months (range, 5-42 months). Four patients (21%) reported fair cosmetic outcome and 15 patients (79%) reported good or excellent cosmetic outcome. No poor cosmesis was reported. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery is well tolerated with acceptable rates of acute toxicities and a high rate of good-to-excellent patient-reported cosmetic outcomes.

Barriers to Coronavirus Disease 19 vaccination in patients with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obesity are at a high risk of severe disease and death from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Vaccination offers a safe and effective means of reducing this risk. The rate of COVID-19 vaccine refusal in patients with obesity is unknown. METHODS: Patients with obesity were administered validated questionnaires assessing COVID-19 fear, general vaccine hesitancy, and COVID-19-specific vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: 507 participants completed the study. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was high: Fifteen percent of patients refused COVID-19 vaccine. Hesitancy related to other vaccines was also high: Eight percent of patients refused a vaccine in the past, and 15% delayed a vaccine. Fear of side effects and doubts regarding effectiveness were the most common reasons for vaccine refusal. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high risk for complications, vaccine hesitancy is high among patients with obesity. Targeted public health interventions are critical to reduce vaccine hesitancy and improve vaccination rates.

Prostate Cancer Screening Disparities in Persons Experiencing Homelessness.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in persons experiencing homelessness (PEH), identify factors associated with screening, and compare PSA screening rates in PEH with a matched cohort of persons not experiencing homelessness (non-PEH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 9,249 potentially eligible PEH cared for at a large metropolitan hospital system from an institutional registry of all patients who presented to the health care system as homeless from 2014 to 2021. Homelessness was defined by the presence of the Z-code for homelessness (Z59), the listed address matching to the address of a homeless shelter or other transitional housing or a positive screen for homelessness. A matched cohort of 10,000 non-PEH was generated for comparison. Univariate chi-square analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to evaluate variables associated with PSA testing. RESULTS: A total of 1,605 PEH and 3,413 non-PEH were eligible for PSA screening within the study timeframe. Half of PEH were Black (50%). Medicaid was the most common insurance (51%), followed by Medicare (18%). PEH were less likely to have a PCP (58% v 81%, P < .001) and had a significantly lower PSA testing rate (13% v 34%, P < .001) compared with non-PEH. Univariate analysis revealed that PSA testing was more common in PEH who were employed (P < .001), had private insurance or Medicare (P < .001), or had an established primary care provider (PCP; P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that having a PCP (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.62 to 4.00; P < .001) significantly increased the likelihood of PSA testing in PEH. CONCLUSION: PEH experience low rates of prostate cancer screening. Interventions to increase screening in this population, including increased PCP access, are needed.

Incidence of clinical lymphedema in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy.

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of clinical lymphedema following adjuvant proton-based radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer (BC) patients. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify BC patients treated with adjuvant proton-based RT. Patients receiving re-irradiation for a BC recurrence or those with a history of ipsilateral chest wall radiation were excluded. Clinical lymphedema was determined by documentation in the chart at baseline and during follow-up. Results: We identified 28 patients treated with adjuvant proton-based RT who met the study criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 45 (range, 24-75). Eleven patients (39%) underwent mastectomy, and fourteen (50%) underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Median number of LNs removed was 6 (range, 1-28). Nineteen patients (68%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Median whole breast/chest wall dose delivered was 50 Gy (range, 44-54.0 Gy). Target volumes included the axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes in all patients and internal mammary lymph nodes in 27 (96%) patients. Mean dose to the axilla was 49.7 Gy, and mean dose to 95% of the axillary volume (D95) was 46.3 Gy (94% of prescription dose). Mean dose to supraclavicular (SCV) volume was 47.7 Gy, and D95 was 44.1 Gy (91% of prescription dose). Grade 3 dermatitis occurred in 14% of patients. Five patients (18%) had clinical lymphedema, 4 from the ALND subset (n = 14). Conclusions: The incidence of clinical lymphedema after proton-based RT is comparable to rates reported with photon-based RT with comprehensive nodal coverage.

Sex-Specific Differences in Low-Grade Glioma Presentation and Outcome.

PURPOSE: In addition to established prognostic factors in low-grade glioma (LGG), studies suggest a sexual dimorphism with male sex portending worse prognosis. Our objective was to identify the effect of sex on presentation and outcomes in LGG. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with LGG (World Health Organization 2016 grade 2 glioma). Patients with IDH wild-type tumors were excluded. Patients were matched between male and female sex by age, treatment, and surgery via propensity score matching. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed by sex. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), next intervention-free survival (NIFS), progression-free survival, and malignant transformation-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analysis with backward elimination were completed. RESULTS: Of the 532 patients identified, 258 (48%) were men. Men were more likely to present with seizure (69.38% vs 56.57%, P = .002), but no other statistically significant differences between sexes at presentation were identified. Five-year OS was higher in women at 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-91%) versus 78% (95% CI, 73%-84%) in men (P = .0045). NIFS was significantly higher in female patients at 68% (95% CI, 62%-74%) versus 57% (95% CI, 51%-64%) in men (P = .009). On multivariable analysis, female sex was independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16-2.05; P = .002), NIFS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.42; P = .004), and malignant transformation-free survival (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.24-2.12; P = .0004). In patients with molecularly defined LGG (IDH and 1p19q status; n = 291), female sex remained independently associated with improved OS (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.77; P = .008) and NIFS (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.96; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, female sex was independently associated with improved outcomes. These findings support intrinsic sex-specific differences in LGG behavior, justifying further studies to optimize management and therapeutics based on sex.

Breast cancer awareness among Afghan refugee women in Turkey.

Background Refugees and asylum-seekers have lower levels of cancer awareness and this contributes to low rates of screening and more advanced cancers at diagnosis, compared to non-refugee populations, due largely to reduced access to medical information and care. The global Afghan refugee population is rapidly increasing with the ongoing Afghan political crisis. The present study investigates breast cancer (BC) awareness among Afghan refugee women. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of Afghan refugee women residing in Turkey was performed in September 2021. A validated BC patient awareness assessment, the Breast Cancer Awareness Measure (BCAM), was used to assess participants' knowledge of seven domains of BC: symptoms, self-examination, ability to notice breast changes, age-related risk of BC, urgency of addressing changes in the breast, BC risk factors, and BC screening. BCAM was translated into patients' native language and administered verbally by a physician with the assistance of an official interpreter. Routine statistical methods were employed for data analysis. Findings: A total of 430 patients were recruited to the study. The response rate was 97·7% (420 patients). The median participant age was 35 years (range: 18 to 68 years). The majority of participants (84%) had no formal education. Most participants (96%) were married, and most (95%) were not employed. Awareness of warning signs of BC was low: only seven to 18% of participants recognized 11 common warning signs of BC. Participant use of breast self-exam (BSE) was low, with 82% of participants stating they rarely or never complete BSE. Zero of 420 patients reported ever seeing a physician for a change in their breasts. Awareness of risk factors for BC was also low: only 15% of participants recognized increasing age as a risk factor for BC, and other risk factors were only recognized by four to 39% of participants. Interpretation: BC awareness among Afghan refugee women is critically low. There is an urgent need to target this population for practical interventions to increase BC awareness, in addition to screening and earlier diagnosis. Evidence-based interventions include educational sessions in patients' native language and use of BSE and clinical breast examination for screening. Funding: American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) - Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) Global Health Scholar Grant, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Jay Harris Junior Faculty Research Grant.

Utilization of radiation therapy and predictors of noncompliance among Syrian refugees in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Access to cancer care is a problem that continues to plague refugees displaced from their home countries. The turbulent political crisis in Syria, which has led to millions of refugees seeking asylum in Turkey, merits further attention. We aimed to study the rate of utilization of radiation therapy among Syrian refugees with cancer living in Turkey in an attempt to identify the contributing factors predictive of non-compliance with prescribed RT. METHODS: In this retrospective review of 14 institutional databases, Syrian refugee patients in Turkey with a cancer diagnosis from January 2015 to December 2019 who were treated with RT were identified. The demographic data, treatment compliance rates, and toxicity outcomes in these patients were surveyed. Variable predictors of noncompliance such as age, sex, diagnosis, treatment length, and toxicity were studied. The association between these variables and patient noncompliance was determined. RESULTS: We identified 10,537 patients who were diagnosed with cancer during the study period, of whom 1010 (9.6%) patients were treated with RT. Breast cancer (30%) and lung cancer (14%) were the most common diagnoses with up to 68% of patients diagnosed at an advanced stage (Stage III, IV). 20% of the patients were deemed noncompliant. Treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.06-2.46, p = 0.023) and living in a refugee camp (OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.43-5.19, p < 0.001) were associated with noncompliance. Age, sex and treatment length were not significantly associated with noncompliance. CONCLUSIONS: Noncompliance with radiotherapy among Syrian refugees in Turkey remains an area of concern with a multitude of factors contributing to these alarming numbers. Further studies to better ascertain the finer nuances of this intricately complex problem and a global combination of efforts can pave the way to providing a solution.

Risk Factors for the Development of Clinical and Subclinical Lymphedema Detected by Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema can significantly compromise quality of life. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measures extracellular fluid in lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of BIS-detected lymphedema using the L-Dex and identify risk factors associated with a positive score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify patients who underwent L-Dex U400 measurements. Patients with a score of > 10 L-Dex units or with an increase of > 10 units from baseline had a positive score. Clinical lymphedema was determined by documentation in the chart at the time of positive measurement. Otherwise, patients were considered to have subclinical lymphedema. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met study criteria. Thirty patients (56.6%) underwent mastectomy, 22 (41.5%) axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and 33 (62.3%) received radiation (RT). Twelve patients (22.6%) had a positive score. There were no differences in age, race, laterality, breast surgery, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy, or RT fields (none, breast only, breast with LNs) in patients with a positive score. ALND was more common (66.7% vs. 34.2%, P= .04). BMI > 30 approached significance (58.3% vs. 29.3%, P= .06). Seven patients had subclinical lymphedema. No differences were identified comparing patients with subclinical lymphedema to those with negative scores. All 5 patients with clinical lymphedema underwent ALND and received nodal RT. CONCLUSION: The combination of ALND and regional nodal RT is strongly associated with development of clinical lymphedema. It is difficult to identify patients at risk for subclinical BIS-detected lymphedema.

Radiotherapy modality as a predictor of survival in hypopharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of radiotherapy (RT) modality and dose on survival in hypopharyngeal cancer managed with definitive RT is unclear. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) treated with definitive RT. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was compared with other RT techniques. Clinicopathologic variables, RT modality, and dose impact on overall survival (OS) were assessed using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 3928 patients with HPSCC were identified. Patients receiving IMRT (2098 patients) were more likely to be white, have higher income, have advanced classification, receive ≥66 Gy, and receive chemoradiotherapy compared with those receiving non-IMRT techniques (1830 patients). The 5-year OS was 41.9% (95% CI = 39.4%-44.4%) for the IMRT group and 36.8% for the non-IMRT group (95% CI = 34.3%-39.2%). After propensity score matching, IMRT had significantly better OS (P = .013). CONCLUSION: In HPSCC treated with definitive RT, IMRT may provide a significant survival benefit over non-IMRT modalities.

Decision-Making Strategy for Rectal Cancer Management Using Radiation Therapy for Elderly or Comorbid Patients.

Rectal cancer predominantly affects patients older than 70 years, with peak incidence at age 80 to 85 years. However, the standard treatment paradigm for rectal cancer oftentimes cannot be feasibly applied to these patients owing to frailty or comorbid conditions. There are currently little information and no treatment guidelines to help direct therapy for patients who are elderly and/or have significant comorbidities, because most are not included or specifically studied in clinical trials. More recently various alternative treatment options have been brought to light that may potentially be utilized in this group of patients. This critical review examines the available literature on alternative therapies for rectal cancer and proposes a treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians in treatment decision making for elderly and comorbid patients.

Predictors of clinical-pathologic stage discrepancy in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: A National Cancer Database study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the frequency and survival implications of clinicopathologic stage discrepancy in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: Oral cavity SCC cases with full pathologic staging information were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Clinical and pathologic stages were compared. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with stage discrepancy. RESULTS: There were 9110 cases identified, of which 67.3% of the cases were stage concordant, 19.9% were upstaged, and 12.8% were downstaged. The N classification discordance (28.5%) was more common than T classification discordance (27.6%). In cases of T classification discordance, downstaging is more common than upstaging (15.4% vs 12.1% of cases), but in cases of N classification discordance, the reverse is true; upstaging is much more common than downstaging (20.1 vs 8.4% of cases). CONCLUSION: Clinicopathologic stage discrepancy in oral cavity SCC is a common phenomenon that is associated with a number of clinical factors and has survival implications.

Comparison of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of 652 patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of endoscopic resection as an alternative to open surgery for sinonasal malignancies has increased in the past 20 years. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) without cervical or distant metastases that were treated surgically between 2010 and 2014. They were split into 2 groups based on surgical approach: open or endoscopic. Demographics, facility and insurance type, stage, tumor characteristics, postoperative treatment, 30-day readmission rate, 30- and 90-day mortality, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mimic a randomized, controlled trial. RESULTS: A total of 1,483 patients were identified: 353 (23.8%) received endoscopic and 1130 (76.2%) received open surgery. Age, gender, race, geographic region, tumor size, surgical margins, postoperative chemoradiation, and 30-day readmissions did not vary significantly between the 2 groups. Open surgery was more common in academic centers (62.8% vs 54.2%; p = 0.004), less common for tumors of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinus (p < 0.0001), less common for stage IVB tumors, and associated with longer hospital stay (mean, 4.67 days vs 2.50 days; p < 0.0001). Five-year OS (5Y-OS) was not significantly different between the 2 approaches (p = 0.953; open: 5Y-OS, 56.5%; 95% confidence interval, 51.3% to 61.6%; endoscopic: 5Y-OS, 46.0%; 95% confidence interval, 33.2% to 58.8%). In the PSM cohort of 652 patients, there was also no significant difference in OS (p = 0.850). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic surgery is an effective alternative to open surgery, even after accounting for confounding factors that may favor its use over the open approach. It is also associated with a shorter hospital stay.