[Psychosocial repercussions of hand injuries and support for patients]. / Répercussions psychosociales des accidents de la main et accompagnement des patients.

PSYCHOSOCIAL REPERCUSSIONS OF HAND INJURIES AND SUPUPORT FOR PATIENTS. There are many nonmedical factors influencing a patient's return to work. To optimize care, the practitioner must be aware of the need to go beyond the scope of their own specialty. In particular, they must be able to identify patients with psychological comorbidity and/or chronic pain, in order to direct them as early as possible towards appropriate care. They must also pay particular attention to administrative requests whether these come from the patient themselves or from their insurers. Last but not least, the decompartmentalization of professional practices and the improvement of communication between the stakeholders are essential, although very complex to implement. In the Île-de-France and Centre regions of France, two associations offer support that meets all these best practices.

RÉPERCUSSIONS PSYCHOSOCIALES DES ACCIDENTS DE LA MAIN ET ACCOMPAGNEMENT DES PATIENTS. Il existe de nombreux facteurs autres que médicaux influençant le retour à l'emploi des patients. Afin d'optimiser la prise en charge, le soignant doit avoir en tête qu'il est nécessaire de sortir du champ de sa spécialité. Il doit notamment être capable d'identifier les patients présentant une comorbidité psychique et/ou des douleurs chroniques afin de les orienter au plus tôt vers une prise en charge adaptée. Il doit également porter une attention toute particulière aux demandes administratives, qu'elles émanent du patient lui-même ou de ses assurances. Enfin, il est primordial, bien que très complexe à mettre en oeuvre, de décloisonner les pratiques professionnelles et d'améliorer la communication entre les acteurs. En Île-de-France et en région Centre, deux associations proposent un accompagnement répondant à l'ensemble de ces bonnes pratiques.

[Surgical indications for hand wounds]. / Indications chirurgicales des plaies de la main.

SURGICAL INDICATIONS FOR HAND WOUNDS. Hand injuries are common, with potentially severe consequences. When a patient is seen in the emergency department, a lesion assessment must be carried out to distinguish between extreme emergencies such as amputation or devascularization, which require immediate treatment in a specialized centre. If there is no immediate indication of seriousness, a clinical examination, possibly combined with meticulous exploration, helps to identify the lesions. The presence of tendon, nerve or vascular damage requires surgical management in the operating theatre. Any wound that cannot be reliably explored should be managed in the operating room by a hand surgeon.

INDICATIONS CHIRURGICALES DES PLAIES DE LA MAIN. Les plaies de la main sont fréquentes, avec potentiellement des conséquences graves. Lors de la prise en charge aux urgences, le bilan lésionnel permet de distinguer les situations d'urgence extrême comme une amputation ou une dévascularisation, nécessitant une prise en charge immédiate dans un centre spécialisé. En l'absence d'éléments de gravité immédiats, l'examen clinique, éventuellement associé à une exploration méticuleuse, précise les lésions. La présence d'une atteinte tendineuse, nerveuse ou vasculaire nécessite une prise en charge chirurgicale au bloc opératoire. Toute plaie sans possibilité d'exploration fiable doit être prise en charge au bloc opératoire par un chirurgien de la main.

[Hand accident prevention]. / Prévention des accidents de la main.

HAND ACCIDENT PREVENTION. Advances in surgical techniques and a better organization with SOS mains structures have improved the management of hand injuries. However, there are still too many accidents, which can lead to functional and aesthetic after-effects, as well as their socio-professional consequences. The prevention of hand injuries is therefore mandatory. It is organized with three levels: primary prevention, that aims to prevent the occurrence of the accident itself; secondary prevention, to guide and provide the best emergency care for the patient; and tertiary prevention, to avoid deprofessionalization and provide support for any physical and psychological after-effects.

PREVENTION DES ACCIDENTS DE LA MAIN. Les progrès des techniques chirurgicales et l'organisation en services SOS mains ont contribué à améliorer la prise en charge des accidents de la main. Ceux-ci restent cependant nombreux et peuvent entraîner des séquelles fonctionnelles, esthétiques et avoir des conséquences socioprofessionnelles. La prévention des accidents de la main est donc fondamentale. Elle s'organise en trois volets : la prévention primaire pour éviter la survenue de l'accident, la prévention secondaire pour orienter et prendre en charge au mieux le patient, et la prévention tertiaire afin d'éviter une déprofessionnalisation et accompagner les séquelles physiques et psychologiques éventuelles.

Results of 30 reverse shoulder prostheses for revision of failed hemi- or total shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Revision surgery for shoulder prosthesis remains a difficult task in shoulder surgery. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of 30 reverse shoulder prostheses performed as revision of failed hemi- or total shoulder arthroplasty. The most relevant technical points in surgery are described, as are other surgical options; a rational strategy for the treatment of these patients is proposed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (average age 69.5) were included. Mean follow-up was 36.4 months (range 24-100 months). There were 14 patients in group 1 (Delta III) and 16 in group 2 (Reverse Arrow). RESULTS: A total of 83% were satisfied (16 cases) or very satisfied (9 cases), and 17% were disappointed (5 patients). The mean Constant score increased from a mean of 25-52. The mean score for pain improved from 5 (range 0-15) to 13 (range 5-15) (p < 0.001). The mean score of strength improved from 1 (range 0-6) to 5 (range 0-10) (p < 0.001). The forward elevation changed from a mean of 55° (range 0-120) to 108° (range 40-160) (p < 0.001). There was no significant improvement of external rotation at 0° abduction (range 14°-18°) or internal rotation (range 5-4.63). There were 4 scapular notching. We could not find the influence of scapular notching on Constant Score. Complication rate was 26.6%. CONCLUSION: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis represents an available option in difficult cases of failed hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty when the rotator cuff is irreparable and the glenoid bone stock is sufficient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Mid-term outcome of reverse shoulder prostheses in complex proximal humeral fractures.

The functional outcome of hemiarthroplasty in displaced proximal humeral 3- and 4-part fractures or fracture dislocations in elderly patients is frequently unpredictable and depends on the position of the prosthesis and tuberosity fixation. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty represents an alternative in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a retrospective series of 30 reverse shoulder prostheses in trauma indications. We also compared the results of a less medialized reverse shoulder prosthesis (Arrow) with those reported for the traditional (Delta III) reverse prosthesis. Twenty seven cases were available for analysis. The mean follow-up was 22.5 months. The mean absolute Constant score was 54.9, the score for pain was 13.5, for activities 14, for strength 4.59. The mean active anterior elevation was 112 degrees, abduction 97 degrees, external rotation with the arm at the side: 12.7 degrees, in abduction: 55 degrees. Radiographs revealed no loosening, no glenoid notching. Reverse shoulder prosthesis may be a good alternative for displaced three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures in selected patients. The functional results are more predictable than with hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients.

A prospective, comparative, radiological, and clinical study of the influence of the "remplissage" procedure on shoulder range of motion after stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair.

BACKGROUND: Certain failures of arthroscopic Bankart repairs seem to be related to the presence of a Hill-Sachs defect. It has been suggested that Hill-Sachs lesions can be treated by "remplissage" (filling in) of the defect. The effect of this procedure on the mobility of the shoulder is not known. PURPOSE: To determine if filling in the Hill-Sachs defect with rotator cuff tendon would modify the range of motion of the operated shoulder. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A prospective study of 2 patient populations (arthroscopic Bankart repair alone vs Bankart and remplissage) was undertaken after selecting patients using the Instability Severity Index Score (ISIS). Patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion seen on anteroposterior radiographs had a remplissage procedure if this procedure allowed them to obtain an ISIS lower than 4. The main clinical outcome was the range of motion (external rotation at the side [ER1], external rotation in abduction [ER2], internal rotation [IR], and forward elevation), assessed by the difference between each shoulder at 1 and 2 years' follow-up. Complications, recurrence, and the Walch-Duplay scores were noted at the same time. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: No significant statistical difference was noted in the range of motion between each group: ER1, difference of 4° (P = .22); ER2, difference of 3° (P = .49); anterior elevation, difference of 5° (P = .35); and internal rotation, 2 vertebrae (P = .22). The rate of recurrence was identical in both groups (6.25%). For patients without redislocation, the Walch-Duplay score was excellent (14/17) or good (3/17) in the first group and excellent (12/15) or good (3/15) in the second group. Posterosuperior pain during forceful movements or when tired was noted in one third of patients having undergone remplissage. CONCLUSION: The remplissage technique did not alter the range of motion of the shoulder compared with Bankart procedure alone; however, one third of patients did experience posterosuperior pain.

Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching?

BACKGROUND: Cuff tear arthropathy is the primary indication for total reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In patients with pseudoparalytic shoulders secondary to irreparable rotator cuff tear, reverse shoulder arthroplasty allows restoration of active anterior elevation and painless shoulder. High rates of glenoid notching have also been reported. We designed a new reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a center of rotation more lateral than the Delta prosthesis to address this problem. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does reduced medialization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty improve shoulder motion, decrease glenoid notching, or increase the risk of glenoid loosening? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 76 patients with 76 less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses implanted for pseudoparalytic shoulder with rotator cuff deficiency between October 2003 and May 2006. Shoulder motion, Constant-Murley score, and plain radiographs were analyzed. Minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 44 months; range, 24-60 months). RESULTS: The absolute Constant-Murley score increased from 24 to 59, representing an increase of 35 points. The range of active anterior elevation increased by 61°, and the improvement in pain was 10 points. The gain in external rotation with elbow at the side was 15°, while external rotation with 90° abduction increased by 30°. Followup showed no glenoid notching and no glenoid loosening with these less medialized reverse prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Less medialization of reverse shoulder arthroplasty improves external and medial rotation, thus facilitating the activities of daily living of older patients. The absence of glenoid notching and glenoid loosening hopefully reflects longer prosthesis survival, but longer followup is necessary to confirm these preliminary observations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Subacromial internal spacer for rotator cuff tendon repair: "the balloon technique".

Lateral reattachment of the rotator cuff and the more recent introduction of the double-row rotator cuff repair technique require adequate visualization to define the rotator cuff footprint and the greater tuberosity. In many cases extensive debridement in this area is required to remove the overlying subdeltoid bursa, which can impair visualization laterally on the proximal humerus. Inadequate visualization laterally may lead to improper placement of the lateral row of fixation, compromising the reduction and fixation of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. We describe a surgical technique used to improve lateral visualization of the proximal humerus for placement of lateral anchors during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a Foley catheter. The end of a 14F-diameter Foley catheter is cut just proximal to the balloon end. One to three catheters are introduced in the subacromial space through small anterolateral or posterolateral portals and inflated with 15 mL of air. Adequate distension of the subacromial space allows better visualization, triangulation of the arthroscopic instruments, and anatomic repair of the rotator cuff tendon.