Endocarditis at a large community hospital with on-site cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Infective endocarditis (IE) is still a serious disease. The currently published EURO-ENDO registry showed a rate of surgery of 51.2% and a lower mortality in operated IE patients. We hypothesized differences between our data and the registry. METHODS: Retrospective single centre registry on the hospital course of patients with IE. RESULTS: In four years, 171 IE patients were treated at our hospital. Mean age of patients was 66.5 ± 13.8 years and 62.6% of patients were transferred from other hospitals. There were 85 (49.7%) patients with native valve IE (NVE), 53 (31%) with prosthetic valve IE (PVE) and 33 (19.3%) with either intra-cardiac device related IE (n = 29) or IE associated with central access lines (n = 4) (DRE). A total of 81.3% (n = 139) of patients were sent to cardiac surgery. Using a logistic regression model to analyse predictors of conservative instead of surgical therapy the only independent variables were: presence of large vegetation or abscesses (OR: 0.36, 95%CI 0.15-0.83; p = 0.016) and age (for each ten years) (OR: 1.61, 95%CI 1.11-2.32, p = 0.01). Hospital mortality was 21.6% (n = 37/171), with no difference (p = 0.97) between those who were operated (21.6%, n = 30/139) and those treated conservatively (21.9%, n = 7/32). Comparing those treated conservatively without an indication for surgery with those with an indication, mortality was 9.5% versus 45.5%, p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: In this registry from a hospital with on-site cardiac surgery more than half of patients were referred. The rate of patients treated surgically was 81.3%. Hospital mortality was 21.6%, with no difference between operated and conservatively treated patients.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation (TMVI) Using Edwards SAPIEN 3 Prostheses in Patients at Very High or Prohibitive Surgical Risk: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve surgery in patients with failing bioprosthesis, annuloplasty rings, or in patients with advanced mitral annular calcification (MAC) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Percutaneous antegrade transseptal transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) has recently successfully been performed in those patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk, but data on patients treated by TMVI are sparse. This study sought to evaluate short- and midterm outcomes of patients treated by TMVI at our site in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 2016 to February 2018, seven patients (six women and one man) at high or prohibitive surgical risk underwent TMVI at our site. Three procedures were performed as TMVI in failed mitral valve bioprostheses (TMVI-VIV, "valve-in-valve"), one procedure was performed as TMVI in a failed mitral annuloplasty ring (TMVI-R), and three procedures were performed as TMVI in advanced native mitral annular calcification (TMVI-MAC). Mean age of the population treated was 77 ± 8.1 years, and mean log EuroScore I was 39 ± 0.12%. In all patients, an Edwards SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve was implanted under 3D-TOE and fluoroscopic guidance using a transvenous/transseptal access. Indication for TMVI was the presence of advanced heart failure symptoms in all patients (NYHA class III/IV). The predominant dysfunction of the mitral valve treated was severe regurgitation in 72% (n = 5) and severe stenosis in 29% (n = 2) of all patients. TMVI was technically successful in all procedures. Clinical success with functional improvement of at least one NYHA class after procedure compared with before procedure was also achieved in all patients. Median NYHA class improved significantly from 4 before procedure to 2 after TMVI (p=0.008). Mitral valve regurgitation was reduced to trace or mild in all but one patient, who showed moderate MR after TMVI-MAC. No patient-prosthesis mismatch or LVOT obstruction occurred after TMVI. Two patients underwent interventional ASD closure during the in-hospital course due to a large and persisting atrial septal defect after transseptal access. One patient underwent pacemaker implantation due to complete AV-block after TMVI. One patient died in hospital 12 days after the procedure due to severe hospital-acquired pneumonia and sepsis. In-hospital mortality rate was 14% (1/7) in this high-risk population. After hospital discharge, no death occurred and clinical improvement-according to NYHA functional class-remained stable during one-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this small single-center series, TMVI appears promising for patients at high or prohibitive surgical risk with either failing mitral bioprostheses/annuloplasty rings or native mitral valve dysfunction in combination with advanced MAC. Gaining experience in TMVI and new valves will further improve safety and efficacy of this new treatment option.

Interventional treatment of paravalvular regurgitation by plug implantation following prosthetic valve replacement: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Interventional closure of paravalvular leaks (PVL) by plug implantation has emerged as an alternative to surgical correction, which is associated with high mortality rates for re-operation. To date, data on procedural efficacy and clinical outcome after transcatheter closure is sparse. We present our experience with interventional PVL closure at our site. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 08/2014 to 10/2016 ten patients (three women, seven men) at high surgical risk for repeat surgery underwent interventional PVL closure for severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) in 14 procedures at our site. Nine procedures (64%) were performed for mitral PVLs, five procedures were performed for aortic PVLs (36%). Mean age of the population treated was 70 ± 8.6 years and mean log. Euro-Score I was 27.4 ± 14.9%. All patients were treated by implantation of Amplatzer Vascular Plug III occluders. All aortic PVLs were treated using a retrograde transfemoral access, mitral PVLs were treated using either a transseptal (8/9) or transapical access (1/9) under 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. Indication for PVL closure was the presence of severe heart failure symptoms in all patients (NYHA class III/IV, n = 14) and additional mechanical hemolytic anemia (n = 5) with a need for transfusion. Interventional closure of PVL was completely successful in 12 procedures (85%), partially successful in one procedure due to inability to cross the defect with a wire (7.5%) and failed in one of 14 procedures due to inability of plug deployment in a very large defect (7.5%). One patient in a critical clinical condition died within 24 h after procedure due to progressive cardiogenic shock after procedural failure and refusal of a surgical treatment by cardiac surgeons. After interventional treatment clinical success with improvement in NYHA functional class or hemolysis was achieved in 93% (13/14). Median NYHA class improved significantly from 4 prior to procedure to 2 after PVL closure (p = 0.0005). Severe PVR was significantly reduced to mild in six patients and to moderate in three patients after procedure (p = 0.001). Complications included one hemothorax after transapical access and one pseudoaneurysm after transfemoral arterial access. In-hospital mortality rate was 20% (2/10) in this high-risk population. After hospital discharge no death occurred during 30-day follow-up, one patient died during 1-year follow-up after PVL closure. CONCLUSION: In this single-center series interventional PVL closure appears promising for patients at high surgical risk with symptomatic paravalvular regurgitation. Gaining experience in interventional PVL closure at specialized sites will further improve safety and efficacy of this relatively new treatment option. All patients should be treated within large clinical registries to gain more data on mid- and long-term efficacy of transcatheter PVL closure.

Beta blockers and chronic heart failure patients: prognostic impact of a dose targeted beta blocker therapy vs. heart rate targeted strategy.

BACKGROUND: Beta blockers improve survival in patients with chronic systolic heart failure (CHF). Whether physicians should aim for target dose, target heart rate (HR), or both is still under debate. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 1,669 patients with systolic CHF due to ischemic heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy from the University Hospital Heidelberg and the Clinic of Ludwigshafen, Germany. All patients were treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had a history of CHF known for at least 6 months. Target dose was defined as treatment with ≥ 95% of the respective published guideline-recommended dose. Target HR was defined as 51-69 bpm. All-cause mortality during the median follow-up of 42.8 months was analysed with respect to beta blocker dosing and resting HR. 201 (12%) patients met the dose target (group A), 285 (17.1%) met the HR target (group B), 627 (37.6%) met no target (group C), and 556 (33.3%) did not receive beta blockers (Group D). 5-year mortality was 23.7, 22.7, 37.6, and 55.6% for group A, B, C, and D, respectively (p < 0.001). Survival for group A patients with a HR ≥ 70 bpm was 28.8% but 14.8% if HR was 50-70 bpm (p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving guidelines recommended beta blocker dose or to HR control has a similar positive impact on survival. When on target dose, supplemental HR control additionally improves survival.

Correction of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation of the Medtronic CoreValveTM prosthesis due to a too-low implantation, using transcatheter repositioning.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been introduced for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients not suitable for surgical valve replacement. However, a potential problem of TAVI is the development of severe aortic insufficiency after valve implantation due to a too-low implantation of the valve. METHODS: Since August 2008, a total of 33 TAVI procedures using the 18 Fr Medtronic CoreValve ReValving system has been performed at the authors' institution. RESULTS: Severe post-implantation aortic regurgitation occurred in three patients (9%), due to a too-low implantation. Two of these patients underwent a catheter-based repositioning of the valve using a standard snare; the third patient declined any further intervention. Both repositioning procedures were uneventful, with no significant residual regurgitation. CONCLUSION: Severe aortic regurgitation after TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve system is not uncommon. If the valve is implanted too low, a catheter-based valve repositioning may be the method of choice to resolve the problem.

Severe aortic regurgitation after percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation: on the importance to clarify the underlying pathophysiology.

Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in a 90-year-old man was treated with percutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with a 29-mm CoreValve Revalving system. Following implantation, severe aortic regurgitation occurred. Echocardiography showed a small paravalvular and a huge valvular leakage, probably due to one malfunctioning valve leaflet. Concerning this pathophysiology, a further TAVI was performed using a second 29-mm CoreValve Revalving system, as a "valve-in-valve" implantation.

Beta-blocker treatment of chronic systolic heart failure improves prognosis even in patients meeting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study.

AIMS: Improved prognosis of patients with chronic systolic heart failure by treatment with beta-blockers has been shown in several randomized controlled multicentre trials. However, in clinical practice only a part of heart failure patients meet the inclusion criteria of these trials. The present study evaluates whether reduction of mortality by beta-blockers also can be achieved in patients presenting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Ludwigshafen Heart Failure Registry 675 patients with chronic systolic heart failure consecutively enrolled between January 1995 and June 2004 were divided in two groups either meeting the inclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF trial ('trial patients': n = 278, 60% treated with beta-blockers) or not ('non-trial patients': n = 397; 51% treated with beta-blockers). The distribution of the MERIT-HF exclusion criteria in the group of 'non-trial patients' was as follows: acute myocardial infarction 9.6%; systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg 7.5%; chronic obstructive lung disease 33.2%; other serious diseases potentially limiting prognosis 16.9%; acutely performed or planned ICD, bypass surgery, PCI, heart transplantation: 17.1, 15.9, 7.8, and 4.8%, respectively. Median follow-up was 31.3 months (upper/lower quartile 16.3/50.0 months). All-cause mortality was significantly reduced by beta-blocker treatment not only in 'trial patients' (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86) but also in 'non-trial patients' (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97). CONCLUSION: In clinical practice only the smaller part of the population to be treated for chronic systolic heart failure meets the inclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study. However, beta-blocker treatment is associated with a significantly reduced long-term mortality even in patients meeting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study.

Exercise anaerobic threshold and ventilatory efficiency identify heart failure patients for high risk of early death.

BACKGROUND: The maximal oxygen uptake (peak VO2) is used in risk stratification of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Peak VO2 might be lower than maximally possible if exercise is stopped early because of lack of patient motivation or premature cessation by the investigator. In contrast, the anaerobic threshold (VO2AT) and the ventilatory efficiency (VE versus VCO2 slope) are less subject to these influences. Thus, we compared these parameters with peak VO2 in identifying patients with CHF at increased risk for death within 6 months after evaluation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed cardiopulmonary exercise tests with gas exchange measurements in 223 consecutive patients with CHF (114 coronary artery disease, 92 dilated cardiomyopathy, 17 others) at the Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen between 1995 and 1998. We measured peak VO2, VO2AT and VE versus VCO2 slope. We selected peak VO2 of < or =14 mL/kg per minute, VO2AT of <11 mL/kg per minute, and VE versus VCO2 slope of >34 as threshold values for high risk of death. The median follow-up time was 644 days. Patients with peak VO2 of < or =14 mL/kg per minute had a >3-fold-increased risk (OR=3.4; CI, 1.3 to 9.1), with VO2AT <11 mL/min per kg or VE versus VCO2 slope >34 a 5-fold increased risk for early death (OR=5.3; CI, 1.5 to 19.0; OR=4.8; CI, 1.7 to 13.8, respectively). In patients with both VO2AT <11 mL/kg per minute and VE versus VCO2 slope >34, the risk of early death was 10-fold higher (OR=9.6; CI, 2.1 to 44.7). After correction for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, and New York Heart Association class in a multivariate analysis, the combination of VO2AT <11 mL/kg per minute and VE versus VCO2 slope >34 was the best predictor of 6-month mortality (RR=5.1, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VO2AT of <11 mL/kg per minute and slope of VE versus VCO2 >34, combined, better identified patients at high risk for early death from CHF than did peak VO2 and should therefore be considered when prioritizing patients for heart transplantation.