Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
ACS Omega ; 6(35): 22700-22708, 2021 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34514241

ABSTRACT

Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) are simple, point-of-care diagnostic devices used for detecting biological agents or other analytes of interest in a sample. LFIs are predominantly singleplex assays, interrogating one target analyte at a time. There is a need for multiplex LFI devices, e.g., a syndromic panel to differentiate pathogens causing diseases exhibiting similar symptoms. Multiplex LFI devices would be especially valuable in instances where sample quantity is limiting and reducing assay time and costs is critical. There are limitations to the design parameters and performance characteristics of a multiplex LFI assay with many horizontal test lines due to constraints in capillary flow dynamics. To address some of the performance issues, we have developed a spot array multiplex LFI using Braille format (hence called Blind Spot) and a sensor, MACAW (Modular Automated Colorimetric Analyses Widget), that can analyze and interpret the results. As a proof of concept, we created a multiplex toxin panel, for detecting three toxins, using two letter codes for each. The results indicated that the six-plex, triple toxin assay performs as well as singleplex assays. The sensor-based calls are better compared to human interpretation in discriminating and interpreting ambiguous test results correctly especially at lower antigen concentrations and from strips with blemishes.

2.
ACS Sens ; 5(4): 1102-1109, 2020 04 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32212640

ABSTRACT

We report the successful use of colorimetric arrays to identify chemical warfare agents (CWAs). Methods were developed to interpret and analyze a 73-indicator array with an entirely automated workflow. Using a cross-validated first-nearest-neighbor algorithm for assessing detection and identification performances on 632 exposures, at 30 min postexposure we report, on average, 78% correct chemical identification, 86% correct class-level identification, and 96% correct red light/green light (agent versus non-agent) detection. Of 174 total independent agent test exposures, 164 were correctly identified from a 30 min exposure in the red light/green light context, yielding a 94% correct identification of CWAs. Of 149 independent non-agent exposures, 139 were correctly identified at 30 min in the red light/green light context, yielding a 7% false alarm rate. We find that this is a promising approach for the development of a miniaturized, field-portable analytical equipment suitable for soldiers and first responders.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques/methods , Chemical Warfare Agents/chemistry , Colorimetry/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...