Suspected Sugammadex Hypersensitivity following Repeated Administration in the Setting of Multiple Flap Takebacks in a Brief Timespan.

Sugammadex hypersensitivity is an uncommon event that typically occurs at higher doses. We report a case of suspected sugammadex hypersensitivity in a patient who developed hypoxia and bronchospasm following three administrations of the standard 2 mg/kg doses of sugammadex within 26 hours due to flap takebacks. Hypersensitivity to sugammadex was not initially suspected given that the patient had previous exposures. Diagnoses of pneumothorax, hemothorax, mucus plug, and tracheal tube malposition were immediately ruled out. Furthermore, the onset of hypoxia with sudden loss of tidal volume, development of high peak airway pressures, and temporal correlation with sugammadex administration all supported bronchospasm secondary to a hypersensitivity reaction. Sugammadex is a useful agent for neuromuscular blockade reversal; however, it is critical to carefully examine all adverse reactions. This case report highlights the importance of considering hypersensitivity reactions in the setting of repeat sugammadex administrations in a limited timeframe, such as in free flap reconstruction requiring multiple takebacks to the operating room in the setting of flap compromise.

Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: IV. Interobserver variability in photograph grading: origin and method of reduction.

BACKGROUND: Earlier detection of childhood vision disorders is a prominent goal of vision screening. The Medical Technology and Innovation (MTI) PhotoScreener addresses this objective. Use of this camera does not require verbal feedback and may be administered early in a child's development. Decreasing the variability in photograph grading results will boost the utility of any photoscreening system. This report aims to understand and to decrease intra- and inter-observer variability in grading photoscreening photographs. METHODS: We dissected the photograph grading process and quantified the intra- and inter-observer agreement using intraclass plot correlation coefficients. We evaluated the outcome of a two grader verification system vs. adjudicated measurements with Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves. PARTICIPANTS: Data on 955 children under 5 years of age, normal except for refractive error, each with complete photoscreening and eye examination data, culled from two previous studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intra- and inter-observer agreement in measuring bright crescent dimensions and pupillary diameters. Sensitivity and specificity of detection of hyperopia. RESULTS: Measurements of bright crescents are associated with greater variability than are measurements of pupillary diameters. Recognition and omission of light "rim" measurements from photograph grading will result in superior inter-observer agreement. Photograph independent errors increase variability and may be corrected by remeasurement. A verification system in which the most discrepant 5% of measurements are redone results in ROC curves similar to adjudicated dimension. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude: 1) two novices grading photographs can do as well as one expert in most cases; 2) the proposed grading methodology has undergone statistical validation and can be used in other areas of ophthalmology and medicine; and 3) inter-observer variability, one of the limitations of photoscreening photograph grading, can be reduced. For 95% of the photographs, two novices achieve similar true positive and true negative values with or without adjudication.