Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 59
Filter
1.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 31(5): 879-892, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37424487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is often difficult to automatically segment lung tumors due to the large tumor size variation ranging from less than 1 cm to greater than 7 cm depending on the T-stage. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to accurately segment lung tumors of various sizes using a consistency learning-based multi-scale dual-attention network (CL-MSDA-Net). METHODS: To avoid under- and over-segmentation caused by different ratios of lung tumors and surrounding structures in the input patch according to the size of the lung tumor, a size-invariant patch is generated by normalizing the ratio to the average size of the lung tumors used for the training. Two input patches, a size-invariant patch and size-variant patch are trained on a consistency learning-based network consisting of dual branches that share weights to generate a similar output for each branch with consistency loss. The network of each branch has a multi-scale dual-attention module that learns image features of different scales and uses channel and spatial attention to enhance the scale-attention ability to segment lung tumors of different sizes. RESULTS: In experiments with hospital datasets, CL-MSDA-Net showed an F1-score of 80.49%, recall of 79.06%, and precision of 86.78%. This resulted in 3.91%, 3.38%, and 2.95% higher F1-scores than the results of U-Net, U-Net with a multi-scale module, and U-Net with a multi-scale dual-attention module, respectively. In experiments with the NSCLC-Radiomics datasets, CL-MSDA-Net showed an F1-score of 71.7%, recall of 68.24%, and precision of 79.33%. This resulted in 3.66%, 3.38%, and 3.13% higher F1-scores than the results of U-Net, U-Net with a multi-scale module, and U-Net with a multi-scale dual-attention module, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CL-MSDA-Net improves the segmentation performance on average for tumors of all sizes with significant improvements especially for small sized tumors.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
2.
Am J Cancer Res ; 13(2): 452-463, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36895970

ABSTRACT

Double hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with rearrangement and overexpression of both c-Myc and Bcl-2 responds poorly to standard R-CHOP therapy. In a recent phase I study, Venetoclax (ABT-199) targeting Bcl-2 also exhibited disappointing response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, suggesting that targeting only Bcl-2 is not sufficient for achieving successful efficacy due to the concurrent oncogenic function of c-Myc expression and drug resistance following an increase in Mcl-1. Therefore, co-targeting c-Myc and Mcl-1 could be a key combinatorial strategy to enhance the efficacy of Venetoclax. In this study, BR101801 a novel drug for DLBCL, effectively inhibited DLBCL cell growth/proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest, and markedly inhibited G0/G1 arrest. The apoptotic effect of BR101801 was also observed by increased Cytochrome C, cleaved PARP, and Annexin V-positive cell populations. This anti-cancer effect of BR101801 was confirmed in animal models, where it effectively inhibited tumor growth by reducing the expression of both c-Myc and Mcl-1. Furthermore, BR101801 exhibited a significant synergistic antitumor effect even in late xenograft models when combined with Venetoclax. Our data strongly suggest that c-Myc/Bcl-2/Mcl-1 triple targeting through a combination of BR101801 and Venetoclax could be a potential clinical option for double-hit DLBCL.

3.
J Xray Sci Technol ; 30(6): 1067-1083, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35988260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Volumetric lung tumor segmentation is difficult due to the diversity of the sizes, locations and shapes of lung tumors, as well as the similarity in the intensity with surrounding tissue structures. OBJECTIVE: We propose a dual-coupling net for accurate lung tumor segmentation in chest CT images regardless of sizes, locations and shapes of lung tumors.METHODSTo extract shape information from lung tumors and use it as shape prior, three-planar images including axial, coronal, and sagittal planes are trained on 2D-Nets. Two types of window images, lung and mediastinal window images, are trained on 2D-Nets to distinguish lung tumors from the thoracic region and to better separate the boundaries of lung tumors from adjacent tissue structures. To prevent false-positive outliers to adjacent structures and to consider the spatial information of lung tumors, pairs of tumor volume-of-interest (VOI) and tumor shape prior are trained on 3D-Net.RESULTSIn the first experiment, the dual-coupling net had the highest Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 75.7%, considering the shape prior as well as mediastinal window images to prevent the leakage of adjacent structures while maintaining the shape of the lung tumor, with 18.23% p, 3.7% p, 1.1% p, and 1.77% p higher DSCs than in the 2D-Net, 2.5D-Net, 3D-Net, and single-coupling net results, respectively. In the second experiment with annotations for two clinicians, the dual-coupling net showed outcomes of 67.73% and 65.07% regarding the DSC for each annotation. In the third experiment, the dual-coupling net showed 70.97% for the DSC.CONCLUSIONSThe dual-coupling net enables accurate segmentation by distinguishing lung tumors from surrounding tissue structures and thus yields the highest DSC value.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
4.
Korean J Intern Med ; 37(4): 841-850, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35811370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the feasibility and long-term efficacy of the combination of cytarabine, idarubicin, and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) for treating patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). METHODS: We included 87 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and a t(15;17) or promyelocytic leukemia/retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML-RARα) mutation. Patients received 12 mg/m2/day idarubicin intravenously for 3 days and 100 mg/m2/day cytarabine for 7 days, plus 45 mg/m2/day ATRA. Clinical outcomes included complete remission (CR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and the secondary malignancy incidence during a 20-year follow-up. RESULTS: The CR, 10-year RFS, and 10-year OS rates were 89.7%, 94.1%, and 73.8%, respectively, for all patients. The 10-year OS rate was 100% for patients that achieved CR. Subjects were classified according to the white blood cell (WBC) count in peripheral blood at diagnosis (low-risk, WBC < 10,000/mm3; high-risk, WBC ≥ 10,000/mm3). The low-risk group had significantly higher RFS and OS rates than the high-risk group, but the outcomes were not superior to the current standard treatment (arsenic trioxide plus ATRA). Toxicities were similar to those observed with anthracycline plus ATRA, and higher than those observed with arsenic trioxide plus ATRA. The secondary malignancy incidence after APL treatment was 2.7%, among the 75 patients that achieved CR, and 5.0% among the 40 patients that survived more than 5 years after the APL diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Adding cytarabine to anthracycline plus ATRA was not inferior to anthracycline plus ATRA alone, but it was not comparable to arsenic trioxide plus ATRA. The probability of secondary malignancy was low.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute , Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Arsenic Trioxide/adverse effects , Cytarabine/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Idarubicin/adverse effects , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/genetics , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome , Tretinoin/adverse effects
5.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 24(8): 971-983, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819029

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is a prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin II receptor blockers are widely prescribed to patients with hypertension, while new drugs are continuously developed. However, data on comparative efficacy and safety of novel agents, such as fimasartan, are scarce. Here, we aimed to collect clinical evidence on different angiotensin II receptor blockers using a network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials whose follow-up time is within 12 weeks were identified from eight databases via a systematic literature review. Of the 7909 possibly relevant studies, 61 studies with 14,249 adult patients were included in the analysis. These studies were further subjected to quality appraisal using Cochran's Risk of Bias, and sitting systolic blood pressure was considered the primary endpoint. A Bayesian random effect generalized linear model was used for the network meta-analysis, and the treatment rank probability was determined. Olmesartan (standardized mean difference -0.987 [-1.29, -0.729]) and fimasartan (standardized mean difference -0.966 [-1.21, -0.745]) showed the highest rank probabilities (37% and 35%) in the 4-week group, considering the primary endpoint. Furthermore, the odds ratio of adverse events for all agents did not differ significantly from that of the placebo. The treatment rank of angiotensin II receptor blockers varied depending on the outcome type and follow-up period considerably. Fimasartan rapidly lowered blood pressure in 4 weeks, which was further maintained until 12 weeks, indicating its competent efficacy and tolerability. Our findings may help medical practitioners and patients to select the best angiotensin II receptor blocker against hypertension.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Adult , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Bayes Theorem , Biphenyl Compounds , Blood Pressure , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Pyrimidines , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tetrazoles/adverse effects
6.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(6)2022 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35741123

ABSTRACT

To predict the two-year recurrence-free survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we propose a prediction model using radiomic features of the inner and outer regions of the tumor. The intratumoral region and the peritumoral regions from the boundary to 3 cm were used to extract the radiomic features based on the intensity, texture, and shape features. Feature selection was performed to identify significant radiomic features to predict two-year recurrence-free survival, and patient classification was performed into recurrence and non-recurrence groups using SVM and random forest classifiers. The probability of two-year recurrence-free survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier curve. In the experiment, CT images of 217 non-small-cell lung cancer patients at stages I-IIIA who underwent surgical resection at the Veterans Health Service Medical Center (VHSMC) were used. Regarding the classification performance on whole tumors, the combined radiomic features for intratumoral and peritumoral regions of 6 mm and 9 mm showed improved performance (AUC 0.66, 0.66) compared to T stage and N stage (AUC 0.60), intratumoral (AUC 0.64) and peritumoral 6 mm and 9 mm classifiers (AUC 0.59, 0.62). In the assessment of the classification performance according to the tumor size, combined regions of 21 mm and 3 mm were significant when predicting outcomes compared to other regions of tumors under 3 cm (AUC 0.70) and 3 cm~5 cm (AUC 0.75), respectively. For tumors larger than 5 cm, the combined 3 mm region was significant in predictions compared to the other features (AUC 0.71). Through this experiment, it was confirmed that peritumoral and combined regions showed higher performance than the intratumoral region for tumors less than 5 cm in size and that intratumoral and combined regions showed more stable performance than the peritumoral region in tumors larger than 5 cm.

7.
Br J Cancer ; 124(4): 713-720, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33191408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy/safety of the camptothecin analogues belotecan and topotecan for sensitive-relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: One-hundred-and-sixty-four patients were randomised (1:1) to receive five consecutive daily intravenous infusions of topotecan (1.5 mg/m2) or belotecan (0.5 mg/m2), every 3 weeks, for six cycles. Main outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tolerability and toxicity. The study statistical plan was non-inferiority design with ORR as the endpoint. RESULTS: In the belotecan vs. topotecan groups, ORR (primary endpoint) was 33% vs. 21% (p = 0.09) and DCR was 85% vs. 70% (p = 0.030). PFS was not different between groups. Median OS was significantly longer with belotecan than with topotecan (13.2 vs. 8.2 months, HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-0.99), particularly in patients aged <65 years, with more advanced disease (i.e., extensive-stage disease, time to relapse: 3-6 months), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 or 2. More belotecan recipients completed all treatment cycles (53% vs. 35%; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy/safety of belotecan warrants further evaluation in Phase 3 trials. Belotecan potentially offers an alternative to topotecan for sensitive-relapsed SCLC, particularly in patients aged <65 years, with more advanced disease, or poor performance.


Subject(s)
Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Topotecan/therapeutic use , Aged , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Camptothecin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Topoisomerase I Inhibitors/adverse effects , Topoisomerase I Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Topotecan/adverse effects
8.
Cancer Res Treat ; 52(4): 1002-1009, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32683840

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of burnout and occupational stress among medical oncologists in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted of medical oncologists who were members of Korean Society for Medical Oncology (KSMO) using the Korean Occupational Stress Scale, the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and supplemental questions about work and lifestyle factors. RESULTS: Among 220 active KSMO members, 111 responses were collected. The median age was 42 years (range, 32 to 63 years). Two-thirds of responders worked 6 days per week and half of them worked a total of 60-80 hours per week. Each medical oncologist treated a median of 90-120 patients per week in outpatient clinics and 20-30 patients per week in patient practices. MBI subscales indicated a high level of emotional exhaustion in 74%, a high level of depersonalization in 86%, and a low level of personal accomplishment in 65%: 68% had professional burnout according to high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization scores. The risk of burnout was higher for medical oncologists aged from 30-39 than 40-49 years, and unmarried than married. Considering personal accomplishment, females had a higher risk of burnout. The median score of occupational stress was 63 (range, 43 to 88). Having night-duty call was the strongest risk factor on more stress. A higher stress score was associated with a higher prevalence of burnout. CONCLUSION: Burnout and occupational stress are quite common amongst Korean medical oncologists. Achieving a healthy work-life balance, ensuring balanced workload distribution, and engaging in proper stress relief solutions are necessary.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Oncologists/statistics & numerical data , Workload/psychology , Adult , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Occupational Stress/prevention & control , Occupational Stress/psychology , Oncologists/psychology , Prevalence , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Work-Life Balance , Workload/statistics & numerical data
9.
Cancer Res Treat ; 52(4): 1112-1119, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32599984

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors represents a major advance in the treatment of lung cancer, allowing sustained recovery in a significant proportion of patients. Nivolumab is a monoclonal anti-programmed death cell protein 1 antibody licensed for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior chemotherapy. In this study, we describe the demographic and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab in the Korean expanded access program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Previously treated patients with advanced nonsquamous and squamous NSCLC patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks up to 36 months. Efficacy data including investigator-assessed tumor response, progression data, survival, and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were treated across 36 Korean centers. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 49%, respectively; the median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87 to 3.45), and the overall survival (OS) was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 18.9). Patients with smoking history and patients who experienced immune-related adverse events showed a prolonged OS. Cox regression analysis identified smoking history, presence of immune-related adverse events as positive factors associated with OS, while liver metastasis was a negative factor associated with OS. The safety profile was generally comparable to previously reported data. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis supports the use of nivolumab for pretreated NSCLC patients, including those with an older age.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/secondary , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/immunology , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Progression-Free Survival , Protective Factors , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(11): 5177-5183, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32056013

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between quality of life (QOL) and breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) intensity in patients who met the commonly accepted definition of BTCP. METHODS: This study was a subset analysis of a South Korean multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional, nationwide survey. Participants were recruited from March 2016 to December 2017. BTCP was defined as a controlled background pain of less than a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 3 and any flare-up pain intensity. Pain intensity data were collected using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which includes an interference assessment of the affective and physical domains. Patients were categorized by BTCP intensity into mild (NRS 1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) groups. RESULTS: Of the 969 screened patients with cancer, 679 had ≤ NRS 3 background pain, of whom 438 completed the BPI. Of these 438 patients, 40, 204, and 194 were in the mild, moderate, and severe BTCP groups, respectively. The median NRS of BTCP was 6.0 (interquartile range = 5.0-8.0). Patients with moderate-severe BTCP had significantly higher interference with daily functioning (IDF) scores than did mild BTCP patients (3.3 vs. 5.7; p < 0.01). Both domains of IDF were significantly hampered proportionally by increased BTCP intensity (p < 0.001). The median total IDF scores of the no, moderate, and severe BTCP groups were 3.3, 5.0, and 6.9, respectively. Furthermore, IDF depended on BTCP intensity, duration, and frequency (p < 0.01) but not on pain type and cause. CONCLUSION: An increase in BTCP intensity is likely to result in IDF, regardless of the cause or type of BTCP.


Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain/physiopathology , Cancer Pain/physiopathology , Neoplasms/physiopathology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Eur J Cancer ; 127: 183-190, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668839

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) demonstrated mild toxicity and promising effectiveness in patients with advanced urothelial cell cancer (UCC). We investigated the activity and safety of first-line GEMOX compared with gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCb) in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UCC. METHODS: Treatment-naive, cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UCC were randomly assigned to GEMOX (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 [D1] every 2 weeks) or GCb (1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine on D1 and D8 and carboplatin area under the curve of 4.5 mg/mL/min on D1 every 3 weeks). We evaluated the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between January 2011 and March 2017, 80 patients were enrolled; 39 and 40 patients were allocated to GCb and GEMOX arms, respectively. The ORR was 48.7% in the GCb arm and 55.0% in the GEMOX arm. The median follow-up duration was 37.8 months; the median PFS and OS in the GCb and GEMOX arms were 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-6.2) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.1) and 9.1 months (95% CI, 5.2-13.0) vs. 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.9-15.0), respectively. ≥Leucopenia, neutropenia and fatigue of ≥ grade III were significantly more common in the GCb arm (26% vs. 3%, P = 0.003; 33% vs. 10%, P = 0.014; 15% vs. 3%, P = 0.012), whereas any-grade neuropathy was more common in the GEMOX arm (8% vs. 60%). CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX showed similar efficacy with GCb and a favourable haematologic toxicity profile. GEMOX may be an additional chemotherapy option for patients with UCC ineligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (NCT01487915).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Gemcitabine
12.
Korean J Intern Med ; 35(1): 205-214, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31795023

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is a cornerstone of clinical oncology. This study investigated the current state of MDT care, including patient satisfaction, in Korea. METHODS: We obtained the annual number of cancer patients who have received MDT care since 2014 from the registry of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). In addition, patients who received MDT care from August 2014 to May 2017 at four university hospitals were further characterized, and patient satisfaction was measured prospectively using a patient-reported questionnaire. RESULTS: The total number of patients who received MDT care increased from 2014 to 2016 (2,113 to 9,998 patients, respectively) in the HIRA Cohort. The type of cancer that most often required MDT was breast cancer (23.8%), followed by colorectal cancer (19.1%). In the Representative Cohort (n = 1,032), MDT was requested by the surgeon more than half the time (55.7%). The main focus of MDT was decision making for further treatment planning (99.0%). The number of doctors participating in the MDT was usually five (70.0%). After initiating an MDT approach, the treatment plan changed for 17.4% of patients. Among these patients, 359 completed a prospective satisfaction survey regarding their MDT care. The overall satisfaction with the MDT approach was very high, with an average score of 9.6 out of 10 points. CONCLUSION: The application of MDT care is a rapidly growing trend in clinical oncology, and shows high patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to determine which types of cancer patients could benefit most from MDT, and to enable MDT care to operate more efficiently so that it may expand successfully throughout Korea.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Planning , Patient Care Team , Prospective Studies , Republic of Korea
13.
Thorac Cancer ; 11(1): 62-71, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) have not previously been reported. METHODS: This study analyzed 352 patients enrolled in a previous randomized phase III trial comparing the efficacy of irinotecan plus cisplatin with that of etoposide plus cisplatin as the first-line therapy for ED-SCLC. GNRI values were calculated using serum albumin levels and actual and ideal bodyweights. Patients with a GNRI > 98, 92-98, and <92 were grouped into no, low, and moderate/major risk groups, respectively. RESULTS: The objective response rates were 63.2%, 52.6%, and 49.2% in the no, low, and moderate/major risk groups, respectively (P = 0.024). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in patients with a lower GNRI than in those with a higher GNRI (no vs. low vs. moderate/major risk group; 6.5 vs. 5.8 vs. 5.9 months, respectively; P = 0.028). There were significant differences in median overall survival (OS) according to GNRI (no vs. low vs. moderate/major risk group; 13.2 vs. 10.3 vs. 8.4 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that being in the moderate/major risk group was an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.300, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012-1.670; P = 0.040) and OS (HR: 1.539; 95% CI: 1.069-2.216; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows that a low GNRI value was associated with a poor prognosis, and it supports the relationship between systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and clinical outcomes in patients with ED-SCLC.Key points SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The lower GNRI group had a low response rate to chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. The HRs for PFS and OS were 1.300 and 1.539 in the patients with GNRI < 92. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Low GNRI is associated with poor prognosis in ED-SCLC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Nutritional Status , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Survival Rate
14.
Lung Cancer ; 135: 66-72, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this phase 1/2 study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of olmutinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed ≥ 1 previous line of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase 1 consisted of dose-escalation and four dose-expansion parts (1: olmutinib 300 mg once daily; 2A: 800 mg once daily [EGFR T790 M mutation-positive patients]; 2B: 500 mg twice daily [EGFR T790 M mutation-positive]; 3: 800 mg once daily [EGFR T790 M mutation-negative]). In phase 2, EGFR T790 M mutation-positive patients received olmutinib 800 mg once daily. Data from expansion part 2A and phase 2 were integrated (`pooled phase 2'). Each olmutinib cycle was 21 days. Outcomes included: tumor response, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Overall, 272 patients received at least one olmutinib dose: dose-escalation (n = 66), expansion parts (n = 165), phase 2 (n = 41). In pooled phase 2, the overall objective response rate, confirmed by independent review, was 55.1% (38/69 evaluable patients; 95% CI, 42.6-67.1). All responses were partial responses; 23 patients had stable disease. Estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 (95% CI, 5.6-9.7) months; estimated median overall survival was not reached. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (59.2% of patients), pruritus (42.1%), rash (40.8%), and nausea (39.5%). CONCLUSION: Olmutinib showed effective clinical activity with a manageable safety profile, indicating therapeutic potential for T790M-positive NSCLC patients who have failed ≥ 1 previous line of EGFR-TKI therapy.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alleles , Amino Acid Substitution , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/adverse effects , Piperazines/pharmacokinetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Outcome
15.
Korean J Intern Med ; 34(1): 165-177, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29172407

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colorectal cancer is associated with different anatomical, biological, and clinical characteristics. We determined the impact of the primary tumor location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Demographic data and clinical information were collected from 1,115 patients from the Republic of Korea, who presented with mCRC between January 2009 and December 2011, using web-based electronic case report forms. Associations between the primary tumor location and the patient's clinical characteristics were assessed, and factors inf luencing overall survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Of the 1,115 patients recruited to the study, 244 (21.9%) had right colon cancer, 483 (43.3%) had left colon cancer, and 388 (34.8%) had rectal cancer. Liver and lung metastases occurred more frequently in patients with left colon and rectal cancer (p = 0.005 and p = 0.006, respectively), while peritoneal and ovarian metastases occurred more frequently in patients with right and left colon cancer (p < 0.001 and p = 0.031, respectively). The median overall survival of patients with tumors originating in the right colon was significantly shorter than that of patients whose tumors had originated in the left colon or rectum (13.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 12.0 to 15.5] vs. 18.0 months [95% CI, 16.3 to 19.7] or 19.9 months [95% CI, 18.5 to 21.3], respectively; p = 0.003). Tumor resection, the number of metastatic sites, and primary tumor location correlated with overall survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Primary tumor location influences the metastatic sites and prognosis of patients with mCRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Republic of Korea
16.
Cancer Res Treat ; 51(1): 1-11, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29397659

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial to compare S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) with S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stage III gastric cancer patients who had received curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomized into equal groups to receive adjuvant chemotherapy of eight cycles of DS (S-1 70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-14 plus docetaxel 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks or SP (S-1 70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-14 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate. RESULTS: Between November 2010 and July 2013, 153 patients (75 patients to DS and 78 patients to SP) were enrolled from 8 institutions in Korea. After the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin was approved based on the CLASSIC study, itwas decided to close the study early. With a median follow-up duration of 56.9 months, the 3-year DFS rate between two groups was not significantly different (49.14% in DS group vs. 52.5% in SP group). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (42.7% in DS and 38.5% in SP, p=0.351). SP group had more grade 3-4 anemia (1.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.037), whereas grade 3-4 hand-foot syndrome (4.1% vs. 0%, p=0.025) and mucositis (10.7% vs. 2.6%, p=0.001) were more common in DS group. Fifty-one patients (68%) in DS group and 52 (66.7%) in SP group finished planned treatment. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that SP or DS is an effective and tolerable option for patients with curatively resected stage III gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Docetaxel/adverse effects , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Combinations , Female , Gastrectomy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxonic Acid/adverse effects , Republic of Korea , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Survival Analysis , Tegafur/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
17.
Cancer Res Treat ; 51(1): 119-127, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529858

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of irinote-can plus cisplatin (IP) over etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in Korean patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive IP, composed of irinotecan 65 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8+cisplatin 70 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks, or EP, composed of etoposide 100 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 3+cisplatin 70 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles, until disease progression, or until unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were randomized to IP (n=173) and EP (n=189) arms. There were no significant differences between IP and EP arms for the median overall survival (10.9 months vs. 10.3 months, p=0.120) and the median progression-free survival (6.5 months vs. 5.8 months, p=0.115). However, there was a significant difference in response rate (62.4% vs. 48.2%, p=0.006). The pre-planned subgroup analyses showed that IP was associated with longer overall survival in male (11.3 months vs. 10.1 months, p=0.036), < 65 years old (12.7 months vs. 11.3 months, p=0.024), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 (12.4 months vs. 10.9 months, p=0.040) patient groups. The severity of treatment-related adverse events such as grade 3/4 anemia, nausea and diarrhea was more frequent in patients treated with IP. CONCLUSION: The IP chemotherapy did not significantly improve the survival compared with EP chemotherapy in Korean patients with extensive-disease SCLC.


Subject(s)
Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Irinotecan/administration & dosage , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Drug Administration Schedule , Etoposide/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Irinotecan/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Republic of Korea , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
18.
Korean J Intern Med ; 34(3): 626-633, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29843493

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite increased demand for cancer patient's to make their own decisions based on an adequate understanding of what is involved in chemotherapy, the primary signing agent and the reasons for surrogate signing have not been appropriately evaluated. METHODS: The ethics committee of the palliative medicine subgroup of the Korean Cancer Study Group designed this study and solid cancer patients to whom chemotherapy was offered, from seven institutions, were evaluated. The details relating to surrogate's signing of chemotherapy consent were evaluated. Then, we analyzed the factors associated with surrogate's signing according to patient's demographics and characteristics related to chemotherapy consent. RESULTS: Surrogate's signing was noted for 20.7% (84/405) of patient and over half of surrogate signings were performed by the patients' son or daughter (60.7%). Two main reasons for surrogate signing were patient's incapacity (34.5%) and taking over authorization from patients (33.3%). The factors associated with more frequent surrogate's signing were absence of spouse, lower education level, outpatient, and when residents played a role as a principle provider of chemotherapy consent. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the lack of patients' own decision making for chemotherapy in some situations. This ethical dilemma must be considered for adequately informed decision making for chemotherapy while ensuring the patients' autonomy is maintained.


Subject(s)
Drug Therapy/ethics , Informed Consent , Personal Autonomy , Aged , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
19.
Cancer Res Treat ; 50(4): 1252-1259, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29334610

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signals are important in carcinogenesis and progression of prostate cancer. Dovitinib is an oral, pan-class inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of dovitinib in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a single-arm, phase II, open-label, multicenter trial of dovitinib 500 mg/day (5-days-on/2-days-off schedule). The primary endpointwas 16-week progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate. Biomarker analyses for VEGFR2, FGF23, and FGFR2 using multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed. RESULTS: Forty-four men were accrued from 11 hospitals. Eighty percent were post-docetaxel. Median PSA was 100 ng/dL, median age was 69, 82% had bone metastases, and 23% had liver metastases. Median cycles of dovitinibwas 2 (range, 0 to 33). Median PFSwas 3.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 5.98) and median OS was 13.70 months (95% CI, 0 to 27.41). Chemotherapy-naïve patients had longer PFS (17.90 months; 95% CI, 9.23 to 28.57) compared with docetaxel-treated patients (2.07 months; 95% CI, 1.73 to 2.41; p=0.001) and the patients with high serum VEGFR2 level over median level (7,800 pg/mL) showed longer PFS compared with others (6.03 months [95% CI, 4.26 to 7.80] vs. 1.97 months [95% CI, 1.79 to 2.15], p=0.023). Grade 3 related adverse events were seen in 40.9% of patients. Grade 1-2 nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, and all grade thrombocytopenia are common. CONCLUSION: Dovitinib showed modest antitumor activity with manageable toxicities in men with mCRPC. Especially, patients who were chemo-naïve benefitted from dovitinib.


Subject(s)
Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Quinolones/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 , Fibroblast Growth Factors/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quinolones/adverse effects , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2/metabolism , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/metabolism
20.
Br J Cancer ; 118(5): 648-653, 2018 03 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29381690

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether pazopanib maintenance following first-line chemotherapy would improve survival in patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). METHODS: This study is a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II study that enroled ED-SCLC patients who had not progressed after four cycles of etoposide plus platinum therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1 ratio) to either placebo or pazopanib 800 mg per day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 97 patients were enroled and randomly assigned; 2 patients did not receive study drugs. In total, 95 patients received maintenance therapy (pazopanib, n=48; placebo, n=47) and were included in the analyses. Grade 3 toxicities for pazopanib maintenance were thrombocytopenia (10.4%, including one case with grade 4 toxicity), liver enzyme elevation (10.4%), fatigue (6.3%), and hypertension (6.3%). Median PFS was 3.7 months for pazopanib maintenance and 1.8 months for placebo (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.69, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib maintenance significantly prolonged PFS in patients with ED-SCLC. Given the toxicity profiles, however, relevant biomarkers to select patients for benefit from pazopanib should be further investigated.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Maintenance Chemotherapy/methods , Pyrimidines/administration & dosage , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Indazoles , Male , Middle Aged , Platinum/administration & dosage , Platinum/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Pyrimidines/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...