Small graft size and hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes in living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective multicentric cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined associations between the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and HCC outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry who underwent LDLT for HCC from 2014-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized using the cutoff GRWR for HCC recurrence determined by an adjusted cubic spline (GRWR<0.7% vs. GRWR≥0.7%). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and HCC recurrence were analyzed in the entire and a 1:5 propensity-matched cohort. RESULTS: The eligible cohort consisted of 2005 LDLT recipients (GRWR<0.7 [n=59] vs. GRWR≥0.7 [n=1946]). In the entire cohort, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the GRWR<0.7 than in the GRWR≥0.7 group (66.7% vs. 76.7%, P =0.019), although HCC recurrence was not different between groups (77.1% vs. 80.7%, P =0.234). This trend was similar in the matched cohort ( P =0.014 for RFS and P =0.096 for HCC recurrence). In multivariable analyses, GRWR<0.7 was an independent risk factor for RFS (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.89, P =0.012), but the result was marginal for HCC recurrence (aHR 1.61, P =0.066). In the pretransplant tumor burden subgroup analysis, GRWR<0.7 was a significant risk factor for both RFS and HCC recurrence only for tumors exceeding the Milan criteria (aHR 3.10, P <0.001 for RFS; aHR 2.92, P =0.003 for HCC recurrence) or with MoRAL scores in the fourth quartile (aHR 3.33, P <0.001 for RFS; aHR 2.61, P =0.019 for HCC recurrence). CONCLUSIONS: A GRWR<0.7 potentially leads to lower RFS and higher HCC recurrence after LDLT when the pretransplant tumor burden is high.

The effect of donor against recipient one-way HLA mismatch on liver transplantation outcomes from a multicenter registry analysis.

Donor against recipient one-way Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (D → R one-way HLA MM) seemed strongly associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The aim of this study is to investigate the relevance of D → R one-way HLA MM in outcome of liver transplantation (LT). We retrospectively analyzed 2670 patients in Korean Organ Transplantation Registry database between April 2014 and December 2020. The patients were categorized into two groups whether D → R one-way HLA MM or not and evaluated the outcomes of LT between the two groups. 18 patients were found to be D → R one-way HLA MM. The incidence of GVHD (0.3% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001) and mortality rate (11.6% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.003) was much higher in D → R one-way HLA MM group. D → R one-way HLA MM at 3 loci was seemed to be strongly associated with the incidence of GVHD (OR 163.3, p < 0.001), and found to be the strongest risk factor for patient death (HR 12.75, p < 0.001). Patients with D → R one-way HLA MM at 3 loci showed significantly lower overall survival (p < 0.001) but there were no significant differences in rejection-free survival and death-censored graft survival. D → R one-way HLA MM at 3 loci not only affects the overall survival of LT patients but also the incidence of GVHD.

Outcomes and Risk Factors for Liver Transplantation Using graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio Less than 0.8 Graft from Living Donors: Multicentric Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare graft survival after LDLT in patients receiving GRWR<0.8 versus GRWR≥0.8 grafts and identify risk factors for graft loss using GRWR<0.8 grafts. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Favorable outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR)<0.8 grafts were recently reported; however, these results have not been validated using multicenter data. METHODS: This multicentric cohort study included 3450 LDLT patients. Graft survival was compared between 1:3 propensity score-matched groups and evaluated using various Cox models in the entire population. Risk factors for graft loss with GRWR<0.8 versus GRWR≥0.8 grafts were explored within various subgroups using interaction analyses, and outcomes were stratified according to the number of risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 368 patients (10.7%) received GRWR<0.8 grafts (GRWR<0.8 group), whereas 3082 (89.3%) received GRWR≥0.8 grafts (GRWR≥0.8 group). The 5-y graft survival rate was significantly lower with GRWR<0.8 grafts than with GRWR≥0.8 grafts (85.2% vs. 90.1%, P=0.013). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss using GRWR<0.8 grafts in the entire population was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.35, P=0.004). Risk factors exhibiting significant interactions with GRWR<0.8 for graft survival were age ≥60 y, MELD score ≥15, and male donor. When ≥2 risk factors were present, GRWR<0.8 grafts showed higher risk of graft loss compared to GRWR≥0.8 graft in LDLT (HR 2.98, 95% CI 1.79-4.88, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GRWR<0.8 graft showed inferior graft survival than controls (85.2% vs. 90.1%), especially when ≥2 risk factors for graft loss (among age ≥60 y, MELD score ≥15, or male donor) were present.

Entecavir versus tenofovir on the recurrence of hepatitis B-related HCC after liver transplantation: A multicenter observational study.

Considerable controversy exists regarding the superiority of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) over entecavir (ETV) for reducing the risk of HCC. This study aimed to compare outcomes of ETV versus TDF after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with HBV-related HCC. We performed a multicenter observational study using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. A total of 845 patients who underwent LT for HBV-related HCC were divided into 2 groups according to oral nucleos(t)ide analogue used for HBV prophylaxis post-LT: ETV group (n = 393) and TDF group (n = 452). HCC recurrence and overall death were compared in naïve and propensity score (PS)-weighted populations, and the likelihood of these outcomes according to the use of ETV or TDF were analyzed with various Cox models. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the ETV and TDF groups had similar HCC recurrence-free survival (90.7%, 85.6%, and 84.1% vs. 90.9%, 84.6%, and 84.2%, respectively, p = 0.98) and overall survival (98.4%, 94.7%, and 93.5% vs. 99.3%, 95.8%, and 94.9%, respectively, p = 0.48). The propensity score-weighted population showed similar results. In Cox models involving covariates adjustment, propensity score-weighting, competing risk regression, and time-dependent covariates adjustment, both groups showed a similar risk of HCC recurrence and overall death. In subgroup analyses stratified according to HCC burden (Milan criteria, Up-to-7 criteria, French alpha-fetoprotein risk score), pretransplantation locoregional therapy, and salvage LT, neither ETV nor TDF was superior. In conclusion, ETV and TDF showed mutual noninferiority for HCC outcomes when used for HBV prophylaxis after LT.

Quantitative Prediction of Posttransplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis Using ADV Score: Validation with Korea-Nationwide Transplantation Registry Database.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to validate the prognostic impact of ADV score (α-fetoprotein [AFP]-des-γ-carboxyprothrombin [DCP]-tumor volume [TV] score) for predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver transplantation (LT). BACKGROUND: ADV score has been reported as a prognostic surrogate biomarker of HCC following LT and hepatectomy. METHODS: The study patients were 1599 LT recipients selected from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry database. RESULTS: Deceased-donor and living-donor LTs were performed in 143 and 1456 cases, respectively. Weak correlation was present among AFP, DCP, and TV. The viable HCC group showed ADV score-dependent disease-free survival (DFS) and overall patient survival (OS) rates from 1log to 10log (p<0.001). Prognosis of complete pathological response group was comparable to that of ADV score <1log (p≥0.099). ADV score cutoff of 5log (ADV-5log) for DFS and OS was obtained through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with area under the curve ≥0.705. Both ADV-5log and Milan criteria were independent risk factors for DFS and OS, and their prognostic impacts were comparable to each other. Combination of these two factors resulted in further prognostic stratification, showing hazard ratios for DFS and OS as 2.98 and 2.26 respectively for one risk factor and 7.92 and 8.19 respectively for two risk factors (p<0.001). ABO-incompatible recipients with ADV score ≥8log or two risk factors showed higher recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: This validation study revealed that ADV score is a reliable surrogate biomarker for posttransplant HCC prognosis, which can be used for selecting LT candidates and guiding risk-based posttransplant follow-up surveillance.

Aberrantly Expressed MicroRNAs in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Their Target Oncogenic Signatures in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) contribute to tumor progression, and microRNAs (miRs) play an important role in regulating the tumor-promoting properties of CAFs. The objectives of this study were to clarify the specific miR expression profile in CAFs of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and identify its target gene signatures. Small-RNA-sequencing data were generated from nine pairs of CAFs and para-cancer fibroblasts isolated from human HCC and para-tumor tissues, respectively. Bioinformatic analyses were performed to identify the HCC-CAF-specific miR expression profile and the target gene signatures of the deregulated miRs in CAFs. Clinical and immunological implications of the target gene signatures were evaluated in The Cancer Genome Atlas Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA_LIHC) database using Cox regression and TIMER analysis. The expressions of hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-490-3p were significantly downregulated in HCC-CAFs. Their expression in HCC tissue gradually decreased as HCC stage progressed in the clinical staging analysis. Bioinformatic network analysis using miRWalks, miRDB, and miRTarBase databases pointed to TGFBR1 as a common target gene of hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-490-3p. TGFBR1 expression was negatively correlated with miR-101-3p and miR-490-3p expression in HCC tissues and was also decreased by ectopic miR-101-3p and miR-490-3p expression. HCC patients with TGFBR1 overexpression and downregulated hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-490-3p demonstrated a significantly poorer prognosis in TCGA_LIHC. TGFBR1 expression was positively correlated with the infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and M2 macrophages in a TIMER analysis. In conclusion, hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-490-3p were substantially downregulated miRs in CAFs of HCC, and their common target gene was TGFBR1. The downregulation of hsa-miR-101-3p and hsa-miR-490-3p, as well as high TGFBR1 expression, was associated with poor clinical outcome in HCC patients. In addition, TGFBR1 expression was correlated with the infiltration of immunosuppressive immune cells.

Physical Performance Decline During the Early Posttransplantation Period Affects Survival After Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patient physical performance has been emphasized in liver transplant recipients; however, evidence for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients is lacking. This study investigated the impact of physical performance decline during the early posttransplantation period on survival and risk factors for this decline in LDLT recipients. METHODS: From national registry data, 2703 LDLT patients were divided into 2 groups based on the change in their Karnofsky performance status (KPS) between 1 and 6 mo posttransplantation: declined KPS (n = 188) and control (n = 2515). Multivariable analyses were conducted to control for confounders, including posttransplantation complications. RESULTS: Estimated 5-y patient survival rates were 91.6% in the declined KPS group and 96.3% in the control group, favoring the latter ( P = 0.003). The survival hazard of KPS decline was significant in a baseline covariates-adjusted Cox model (hazard ratio [HR], 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-4.95) and an adjusted model accounting for posttransplantation complications (HR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.70-6.72). In subgroup analyses, KPS decline independently reduced survival in patients without complications (HR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.67-9.34), and the trend was similar in patients with complications, although significance was marginal (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 0.98-9.27). We found that only posttransplantation complications, such as rejection, infection, bile duct complication, and vascular complication, were significant risk factors for KPS decline after LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: Physical performance decline during the early posttransplantation period independently reduced survival rates, and posttransplantation complications were the only significant risk factors for physical performance decline in LDLT recipients.

Selection of Safe Donors for Living Donor Liver Transplant Using Extended Right Lobe Graft.

Extended right lobectomy (ERL) for living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is selectively performed in many transplant centers and has shown excellent recipient outcomes as reported in previous studies. Yet, there is no universally accepted indication for ERL in respect to donor safety. Current study was designed to stratify risk factors of adverse donor outcome after ERL. A total of 79 living donors who underwent ERL for LDLT were included in analysis. Donors were classified as safety and hazard donor groups according to postoperative findings relevant to posthepatectomy liver failure classification by the International Study Group for Liver Surgery. On multivariable analysis, left lateral section volume <20% of total liver volume and nonpreservation of segment 4a venous drainage were the independent risk factors impairing postoperative outcomes. Despite the short-term impairment of liver function in hazard donor groups, all donors recovered and showed satisfactory remnant liver regeneration. However, these findings have implications in establishing selection criteria of donors eligible for ERL donation. In conclusion, LDLT using ERL graft can be safely performed provided so that left lateral section volume/total donor liver is ≥20% besides conventional donor selection criteria. Also, efforts to preserve segment 4a vein must be made in performing ERL graft procurement in LDLT donors.

Diagnostic Role of Tumor Markers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplantation Candidates: An Analysis Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry Database.

BACKGROUND This study analyzed pretransplant alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and proteins induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) in liver transplantation (LT) candidates. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 3,273 LT recipients enrolled at the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry were divided according to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) status and background liver disease, and AFP and PIVKA-II were compared. RESULTS In all patients, the median AFP and PIVKA-II were 6.3 ng/mL and 29 mAU/mL in the viable-HCC group and 3.3 ng/mL and 35 mAU/mL, respectively, in the no-HCC group (P<0.001 for AFP and p=0.037 for PIVKA-II). In patients with hepatitis B virus infection, they were 6.0 ng/mL and 26 mAU/mL in the HCC group and 3.2 ng/mL and 21 mAU/mL in the no-HCC group, respectively (P<0.001 and P<0.001). In patients with hepatitis C virus infection, they were 10.7 ng/mL and 37 mAU/mL in the HCC group and 2.6 ng/mL and 21 mAU/mL in the no-HCC group, respectively (P<0.001 and P=0.117). In alcoholic liver disease patients, they were 5.2 ng/mL and 61 mAU/mL in the HCC group and 6.4 ng/mL and 75 mAU/mL in the no-HCC group, respectively (P<0.001 and P=0.419). In patients with other diseases, they were 7.1 ng/mL and 32 mAU/mL in the HCC group and 3.3 ng/mL and 28 mAU/mL in the no-HCC group, respectively (P<0.001 and P=0.822). CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study indicate that pretransplant serum AFP and PIVKA-II were highly variably expressed in LT candidates with end-stage liver diseases; therefore, their values should be cautiously interpreted because their role in HCC diagnosis is limited.

Incidence, mortality, and survival of liver cancer using Korea central cancer registry database: 1999-2019.

Backgrounds/Aims: Historically, incidence and survival analysis and annual traits for primary liver cancer (LC) has not been investigated in a population-based study in Korea. The purpose of the current study is to determine incidence, survival rate of patients with primary LC in Korea. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Korea Central Cancer Registry based on the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database. Statistical analysis including crude rate and age-standadized rate (ASR) of incidence and mortality was performed for LC patients registered with C22 code in International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision from 1999 to 2019. Subgroup analysis was performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, C22.0) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC, C22.1). Results: The crude incidence rate of HCC (21.0 to 22.8 per 100,000) and IHCC (2.3 to 5.6 per 100,000) increased in the observed period from 1999 to 2019. The ASR decreased in HCC (20.7 to 11.9 per 100,000) but remained unchanged in IHCC (2.4 to 2.7 per 100,000). The proportion of HCC patients diagnosed in early stages (localized or regional Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results or SEER stage) increased significantly over time. As expected, 5-yeat survival rate of HCC was greatly improved, reaching 42.4% in the period between 2013 and 2019. This trait was more prominent in localized SEER stage. On the other hand, the proportion of IHCC patients diagnosed in localized stage remained unchanged (22.9% between 2013 and 2019), although ASR and 5-year survival rate showed minor improvements. Conclusions: A great improvement in survival rate was observed in patients with newly diagnosed HCCs. It was estimated to be due to an increase in early detection rate. On the contrary, detection rate of an early IHCC was stagnant with a minor improvement in prognosis.

Artificial intelligence for predicting survival following deceased donor liver transplantation: Retrospective multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have indicated that the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score may fail to predict post-transplantation patient survival. Similarly, other scores (donor MELD score, balance of risk score) that have been developed to predict transplant outcomes have not gained widespread use. These scores are typically derived using linear statistical models. This study aimed to compare the performance of traditional statistical models with machine learning approaches for predicting survival following liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 785 deceased donor liver transplant recipients enrolled in the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (2014-2019). Five machine learning methods (random forest, artificial neural networks, decision tree, naïve Bayes, and support vector machine) and four traditional statistical models (Cox regression, MELD score, donor MELD score and balance of risk score) were compared to predict survival. RESULTS: Among the machine learning methods, the random forest yielded the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) values (1-month = 0.80; 3-month = 0.85; and 12-month = 0.81) for predicting survival. The AUC-ROC values of the Cox regression analysis were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.77 for 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month post-transplant survival, respectively. However, the AUC-ROC values of the MELD, donor MELD, and balance of risk scores were all below 0.70. Based on the variable importance of the random forest analysis in this study, the major predictors associated with survival were cold ischemia time, donor ICU stay, recipient weight, recipient BMI, recipient age, recipient INR, and recipient albumin level. As with the Cox regression analysis, donor ICU stay, donor bilirubin level, BAR score, and recipient albumin levels were also important factors associated with post-transplant survival in the RF model. The coefficients of these variables were also statistically significant in the Cox model (p < 0.05). The SHAP ranges for selected predictors for the 12-month survival were (-0.02,0.10) for recipient albumin, (-0.05,0.07) for donor bilirubin and (-0.02,0.25) for recipient height. Surprisingly, although not statistically significant in the Cox model, recipient weight, recipient BMI, recipient age, or recipient INR were important factors in our random forest model for predicting post-transplantation survival. CONCLUSION: Machine learning algorithms such as the random forest were superior to conventional Cox regression and previously reported survival scores for predicting 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month survival following liver transplantation. Therefore, artificial intelligence may have significant potential in aiding clinical decision-making during liver transplantation, including matching donors and recipients.

Non-Renal Risk Factors for Chronic Kidney Disease in Liver Recipients with Functionally Intact Kidneys at 1 Month.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical complication of liver transplants, of which non-renal risk factors are not fully understood yet. This study aimed to reveal pre- and post-transplant risk factors for CKD (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), examining liver recipients with functionally intact kidneys one month after grafting using nationwide cohort data. Baseline risk factors were analyzed with multivariable Cox regression analyses and post-transplant risk factors were investigated with the time-dependent Cox model and matched analyses of time-conditional propensity scores. Of the 2274 recipients with a one-month eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 494 (22.3%) developed CKD during a mean follow-up of 36.6 ± 14.4 months. Age, female sex, lower body mass index, pre-transplant diabetes mellitus, and lower performance status emerged as baseline risk factors for CKD. Time-dependent Cox analyses revealed that recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.06−3.53) and infection (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.12−1.60) were significant post-transplant risk factors for CKD. Patients who experienced one of those factors showed a significantly higher risk of subsequent CKD compared with the matched controls who lacked these features (p = 0.013 for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, and p = 0.003 for infection, respectively). This study clarifies pre- and post-transplant non-renal risk factors, which lead to renal impairment after LT independently from patients' renal functional reserve.

Safety of Tacrolimus Monotherapy within 12 Months after Liver Transplantation in the Era of Reduced Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil: National Registry Study.

Tacrolimus monotherapy is accepted as a feasible option during early post-liver transplantation as per current international consensus guidelines. However, its effects in the recent era of reduced tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) remain unclear. Liver recipients who either received TAC monotherapy from the treatment onset or switched from TAC/MMF to TAC-mono within 12 months (TAC-mono group; n = 991) were chronologically matched to patients who continued to receive TAC/MMF (TAC/MMF group; n = 991) at the corresponding time points on time-conditional propensity scores. Outcomes within 12 months after matched time points were compared. Biopsy-proven rejection (TAC/MMF: 3.5% vs. TAC-mono: 2.6%; p = 0.381) and graft failure (0.2% vs. 0.7%; p = 0.082) were similar in both groups. However, the decline in eGFR was 3.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: 0.8-5.3) greater at six months (p = 0.008) and 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: -0.05-4.9) greater at 12 months (p = 0.048) after the matched time points in TAC-mono group than that in TAC/MMF group. TAC trough levels were also higher in the TAC-mono group throughout the study period. TAC-mono within 12 months after liver transplantation is immunologically safe. However, it can increase the required TAC dose and the decline in renal function than that in TAC/MMF combination therapy.

Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in liver transplant patients: a nationwide Korean registry study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) have been recommended after liver transplantation to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus infection. Despite its proven efficacy, the renal safety of TDF has not been established in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the effects of TDF and ETV on renal function in liver transplant recipients and to evaluate risk factors for renal dysfunction after liver transplantation. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational multicenter study of data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. We included adults who underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related complications from April 2014 to December 2017 and received TDF or ETV post-transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate decline by at least 20% from baseline (1 month post-transplantation). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (interquartile range 19-42). RESULTS: A total of 804 liver transplant patients were included. The cumulative probability of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TDF was independently associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.92; p = 0.005). Independent risk factors for renal dysfunction included older age, worse baseline renal function, and low body mass index. Overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with renal dysfunction than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, the use of TDF was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, when compared with ETV.

Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Marker of High Meld Patients Is Associated With Early Mortality After Liver Transplantation.

The scarcity of deceased donor livers has led to allocation of grafts to only the most seriously ill patients with a high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, which has resulted in a high mortality rate after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for posttransplant mortality and thereby reduce futile outcomes in DDLT. Between 2013 and 2019, 57 recipients with MELD scores ≥30 underwent DDLT in our center. We retrieved data and identified the risk factors for 90-day posttransplant mortality. The perioperative clinical and laboratory parameters of patients who did or did not survive for 90 days were subjected to logistic regression analysis. Twelve patients died within 90 days. Results of univariate analysis indicated that the differences in patient survival were determined by the amount of intraoperative platelets transfused, the presence of posttransplant septicemia, and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) at the time of listing with MELD scores ≥30. Multivariate analysis revealed that an SII ≥870 (× 109/L) and posttransplant septicemia were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. Twenty-two patients had SIIs ≥870, and 13 of these patients had posttransplant septicemia. Of the 13 patients, 90-day mortality occurred in 10 cases. However, in 35 patients with SIIs <870, 90-day mortality due to posttransplant septicemia was recorded only in 1 patient. In conclusion, a preoperative SII ≥870 in a patient with a high MELD score may be a significant risk factor for early posttransplant mortality. Because posttransplant septicemia in patients with high SIIs can lead to fatality, a more intensive effort to prevent infection is needed for patients undergoing DDLT carrying such risk factors to avoid futile liver transplantation.

Strategy for Selective Middle Hepatic Vein Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Right Lobe Graft: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to verify the safety and feasibility of our selection criteria for middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using right lobe grafts. METHODS: A total of 153 LDLTs were performed using right lobe grafts in a tertiary hospital from 2006 to 2016. Among them, 52 cases without MHV reconstruction were compared with 101 recipients who underwent LDLT using right lobe graft with MHV reconstruction. Both groups were compared regarding indications for reconstruction, short-term and long-term complications, operative details, and outcomes. RESULTS: The two groups differed only in cold ischemic time (108.19 ± 49.81 minutes vs 146.37 ± 58.74 minutes) preoperatively. Short-term posttransplant outcomes, long-term overall survival, and long-term disease-free survival showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. After propensity score matching for both groups with and without MHV reconstruction to eliminate selection bias, the 2 groups were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: We found that our selection criteria for performing MHV reconstruction in LDLT using right lobe graft were feasible and safe. A routine MHV reconstruction is not necessary if the right lobe graft graft-to-recipient weight ratio is ≥1.0, right hepatic vein draining territory volume is ≥0.8, and recipient Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score is <20.

Risk Factors for Beyond Milan Recurrence After Hepatic Resection for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma No Larger Than 5 Centimeters.

Hepatic resection (HR) is considered a treatment of choice for a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm in patients with preserved liver function. However, it is possible for these patients to develop a severe form of recurrence (beyond Milan recurrence [BMR] criteria). This recurrence could have been avoided if liver transplantation (LT) was performed primarily, as LT is believed to yield a more favorable oncological outcome compared with HR. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for BMR after HR and to verify whether primary LT can provide a more favorable outcome in patients with BMR risk factors. Data from 493 patients who underwent HR for HCC ≤5 cm between 1995 and 2016 were analyzed. Among them, 74 patients (15%) experienced BMR. The 10-year survival rate of patients with BMR was significantly low compared with that of patients without BMR (22.6% versus 79.8%; P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, calculated hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥7 mm Hg and microvascular invasion were identified as the risk factors for BMR (P < 0.05). During the same period, 63 eligible patients underwent LT as a primary treatment for HCC ≤5 cm. No significant difference in long-term survival rate was observed when no risk factor for BMR was present in the HR and LT groups (85.5% versus 100%; P = 0.39). However, 10-year survival was poorer in the HR group in the presence of risk factors for BMR (60.6% versus 91.8%; P < 0.001). Among the patients with HCCs ≤5 cm, which are resectable and transplantable, LT is indicated when calculated hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥7 mm Hg and/or microvascular invasion is present.

Bioelectrical impedance analysis for predicting postoperative complications and survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance analysis provides information on body composition and nutritional status. However, it's unclear whether the preoperative edema index or phase angle predicts postoperative complication or mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thus, we investigated whether preoperative bioelectrical impedance analysis could predict postoperative complications and survival in patients with HCC. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma were prospectively enrolled and bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed before surgery. Postoperative ascites or acute kidney injury and patients' survival were monitored after surgery. RESULTS: Among 79 patients, 35 (44.3%) developed ascites or acute kidney injury after hepatectomy. In multivariate analysis, a high preoperative edema index (extracellular water/total body water) (>0.384) (odds ratio 3.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-15.17; P=0.045) and higher fluid infusion during surgery (odds ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.79; P=0.026) were identified as significant risk factors for ascites or acute kidney injury after hepatectomy. Subgroup analyses showed that the edema index was a significant predictor of ascites or acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis. Tumor size was the only significant predictive factor for short-term survival after hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative edema index using bioelectrical impedance analysis can be used as a predictor of post-hepatectomy complication, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Outcomes after liver transplantation in Korea: Incidence and risk factors from Korean transplantation registry.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To analyze the incidence and risk factors of outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) in the Korean population. METHODS: This study analyzed data from the liver cohort of Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) who had LT between May 2014 and December 2017. Study measures included the incidence of post-LT outcomes in recipients of living donor LT (LDLT) and deceased donor LT (DDLT). Cox multivariate proportional hazards model was used to determine the potential risk factors predicting the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2,563 adult recipients with LT (LDLT, n=1,956; DDLT, n=607) were included, with mean±standard deviation age of 53.9±8.9 years, and 72.2% were male. The post-LT outcomes observed in each LDLT and DDLT recipients were death (4.0% and 14.7%), graft loss (5.0% and 16.1%), rejection (7.0% and 12.0%), renal failure (2.7% and 13.8%), new onset of diabetes (12.5% and 15.4%), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence (both 6.7%). In both LDLT and DDLT recipients, the most common post-LT complications were renal dysfunction (33.6% and 51.4%), infection (26.7% and 48.4%), and surgical complication (22.5% and 23.9%). Incidence of these outcomes were generally higher among recipients of DDLT than LDLT. Multivariate analysis indicated recipient age and DDLT as significant risk factors associated with death and graft loss. DDLT and ABO incompatible transplant were prognostic factors for rejection, and HCC beyond Milan criteria at pre-transplant was a strong predictor of HCC recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study is a good indicator of the post-LT prognosis in the Korean population and suggests a significant burden of post-LT complications.

Efficacy and safety of a switch from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily generic tacrolimus in stable liver transplant patients.

Background: Once-daily tacrolimus reduces non-compliance relative to twice-daily tacrolimus. However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to generic once-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation (LT). Herein, we investigated the efficacy and safety of a switch from twice-daily tacrolimus to generic once-daily tacrolimus in patients with stable liver graft function. Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in 17 medical centers for 1 year from July 2019 to July 2020 (NCT04069065). Primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) for 24 weeks after conversion. Secondary endpoints were graft failure, patient death, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 151 screened LT patients, 144 patients were enrolled. BPAR, graft failure, and patient death did not occur in this patient population. There were no statistical differences in blood tests, liver function tests, or biochemical tests between visits in any of the patients. Median tacrolimus trough level decreased abruptly from 4.7 ng/mL to 3.2 ng/mL after generic once-daily tacrolimus conversion, but median tacrolimus dose increased due to low tacrolimus trough level. Ninety-two adverse events occurred in 54 patients. Liver enzyme levels increased in seven patients (4.9%) after the switch to generic once-daily tacrolimus, but the liver function tests of these patients normalized thereafter. There were three cases of severe AEs not related to investigational drug. Conclusions: Present study suggests that conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to generic once-daily tacrolimus is effective and safe in stable LT patients.