Quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal cancer care delivery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study quantifies how changes in healthcare utilization and delivery during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic have altered the presentation, treatment, and management of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies within an academic health system. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with a GI malignancy (ICD10: C15-C26) who received medical care within the health system during the observation period (first 44 weeks of 2019 and 2020) were identified for a retrospective cohort study. Deidentified patient encounter parameters were collected for this observation period and separated into pre-pandemic (weeks 1-10) and early pandemic (weeks 11-20) study periods. Difference-in-difference analyses adjusted for week-specific and year-specific effects quantified the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care delivery between pre-pandemic and early pandemic study periods in 2020. Across all GI malignancies, the COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a significant decline in the number of patients with new patient visits (NPVs) (p = 1.2 × 10-4 ), Radiology encounters (p = 1.9 × 10-7 ), Surgery encounters (p = 1.6 × 10-3 ), Radiation Oncology encounters (p = 4.1 × 10-3 ), and infusion visits (6.1 × 10-5 ). Subgroup analyses revealed cancer-specific variations in changes to delivery. Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) had the most significant decrease in NPVs (p = 7.1 × 10-5 ), which was significantly associated with a concomitant decrease in colonoscopies performed during the early pandemic period (r2  = 0.722, p = 2.1 × 10-10 ). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with significant disruptions to care delivery. While these effects were appreciated broadly across GI malignancies, CRC, diagnosed and managed by periodic screening, has been affected most acutely.

Survey to determine the relative importance of clinical factors used to make empiric antibiotic decisions.

A cross-sectional survey study of inpatient prescribers in a university health system was performed to assess the importance they place on different clinical risk factors when making empiric antibiotic decisions. Our findings show that these clinical risk factors were weighted differently based on the clinical scenario and the type of prescriber.

Impact of vaginal microbiome communities on HIV antiretroviral-based pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug metabolism.

Despite the efficacy of antiretroviral-based pre-exposure prophylactics (PrEP) in men who have sex with men, studies in women have produced widely varying outcomes. Recent evidence demonstrates that vaginal microbial communities are associated with increased HIV acquisition risk and may impact PrEP efficacy. Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying how vaginal bacteria alter PrEP drug levels and impact HIV infection rates ex vivo. Using cervicovaginal lavages (CVLs) from women with or without bacterial vaginosis (BV), we identified microbial metabolism of PrEP drugs in BV samples through LC-MS/MS analysis of soluble drug levels and metabolite formation in dual T-cell cultures. CVL samples were assessed for microbiome analysis using sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. We also observed non-Lactobacillus bacteria that are associated with BV may potentially impact PrEP efficacy through increased HIV infection rates in co-cultures containing Lactobacillus or BV bacteria, PrEP drugs, CEM-GFP cells, and HIV-1LAI virus. Finally, we used these data to develop a novel predictive mathematical simulation modeling system to predict these drug interactions for future trials. These studies demonstrate how dysbiotic vaginal microbiota may impact PrEP drugs and provides evidence linking vaginal bacteria to PrEP efficacy in women.

Treatments Administered to the First 9152 Reported Cases of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2/2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has created a global pandemic with no approved treatments or vaccines. Many treatments have already been administered to COVID-19 patients but have not been systematically evaluated. We performed a systematic literature review to identify all treatments reported to be administered to COVID-19 patients and to assess time to clinically meaningful response for treatments with sufficient data. We searched PubMed, BioRxiv, MedRxiv, and ChinaXiv for articles reporting treatments for COVID-19 patients published between 1 December 2019 and 27 March 2020. Data were analyzed descriptively. Of the 2706 articles identified, 155 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 9152 patients. The cohort was 45.4% female and 98.3% hospitalized, and mean (SD) age was 44.4 years (SD 21.0). The most frequently administered drug classes were antivirals, antibiotics, and corticosteroids, and of the 115 reported drugs, the most frequently administered was combination lopinavir/ritonavir, which was associated with a time to clinically meaningful response (complete symptom resolution or hospital discharge) of 11.7 (1.09) days. There were insufficient data to compare across treatments. Many treatments have been administered to the first 9152 reported cases of COVID-19. These data serve as the basis for an open-source registry of all reported treatments given to COVID-19 patients at www.CDCN.org/CORONA . Further work is needed to prioritize drugs for investigation in well-controlled clinical trials and treatment protocols.

Comparison of Radiation Therapy Alone and Chemotherapy Alone for Low-Grade Gliomas without Surgical Resection.

BACKGROUND: The combined use of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of surgically resected low-grade gliomas. However, whether RT or CT is associated with improved overall survival (OS) for low-grade gliomas without surgical resection is less clear. METHODS: The U.S. National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 gliomas who received either RT alone or CT alone but did not undergo surgical resection from 2004 to 2013. OS was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: In total, 1126 patients with WHO grade 2 gliomas were included, among whom 715 (63.5%) received RT alone and 411 (36.5%) CT alone. CT alone was associated with significantly longer OS when compared to RT alone on multivariable analysis and propensity-score matched analysis. Age less than 60 years and time from diagnosis to start of adjuvant therapy (RT or CT) greater than 30 days were also associated with longer OS. In subgroup analysis based on age, the survival advantage of CT alone over RT alone persisted in both age subgroups (<60 years and >60 years). In subgroup analyses based on histology of glioma, CT alone was associated with longer OS in the astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma group, but not in the oligoastrocytoma group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that CT alone was independently associated with longer OS when compared with RT alone in patients with low-grade glioma but without surgical resection. This survival advantage persisted in both age subgroups, but it varied by histology of glioma.

Inhibition of Translesion DNA Synthesis as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Treat Brain Cancer.

Temozolomide is a DNA-alkylating agent used to treat brain tumors, but resistance to this drug is common. In this study, we provide evidence that efficacious responses to this drug can be heightened significantly by coadministration of an artificial nucleoside (5-nitroindolyl-2'-deoxyriboside, 5-NIdR) that efficiently and selectively inhibits the replication of DNA lesions generated by temozolomide. Conversion of this compound to the corresponding nucleoside triphosphate, 5-nitroindolyl-2'-deoxyriboside triphosphate, in vivo creates a potent inhibitor of several human DNA polymerases that can replicate damaged DNA. Accordingly, 5-NIdR synergized with temozolomide to increase apoptosis of tumor cells. In a murine xenograft model of glioblastoma, whereas temozolomide only delayed tumor growth, its coadministration with 5-NIdR caused complete tumor regression. Exploratory toxicology investigations showed that high doses of 5-NIdR did not produce the side effects commonly seen with conventional nucleoside analogs. Collectively, our results offer a preclinical pharmacologic proof of concept for the coordinate inhibition of translesion DNA synthesis as a strategy to improve chemotherapeutic responses in aggressive brain tumors.Significance: Combinatorial treatment of glioblastoma with temozolomide and a novel artificial nucleoside that inhibits replication of damaged DNA can safely enhance therapeutic responses. Cancer Res; 78(4); 1083-96. ©2017 AACR.

Expanding perspectives on the significance of mitophagy in cancer.

Mitophagy is a selective mode of autophagy in which mitochondria are specifically targeted for degradation at the autophagolysosome. Mitophagy is activated by stresses such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, DNA damage, inflammation and mitochondrial membrane depolarization and plays a role in maintaining mitochondrial integrity and function. Defects in mitophagy lead to mitochondrial dysfunction that can affect metabolic reprogramming in response to stress, alter cell fate determination and differentiation, which in turn affects disease incidence and etiology, including cancer. Here, we discuss how different mitophagy adaptors and modulators, including Parkin, BNIP3, BNIP3L, p62/SQSTM1 and OPTN, are regulated in response to physiological stresses and deregulated in cancers. Additionally, we explore how these different mitophagy control pathways coordinate with each other. Finally, we review new developments in understanding how mitophagy affects stemness, cell fate determination, inflammation and DNA damage responses that are relevant to understanding the role of mitophagy in cancer.