Acquired Acromion Compromise, Including Thinning and Fragmentation, Is Not Associated With Poor Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Acquired acromial compromise, including thinning (less than 30% of the normal acromion) or fragmentation resulting from acromiohumeral impingement or previous acromioplasty, is a concern in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This condition may lead to shoulder pain and difficulties in arm elevation because of acromial insufficiency fracture. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with acromial compromise (thinning less than 30% of normal acromion or fragmentation) have worse functional outcome scores, ROM, and strength after RSA compared with patients without acromial compromise? (2) Are patients with acromial compromise at a higher risk of complications such as acromial insufficiency fracture after RSA? (3) Do patients who develop acromial insufficiency fracture have predisposing associated factors and worse clinical outcomes? METHODS: Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, we treated 398 patients with RSA, and all patients were considered potentially eligible for this study. Our clinic is part of the orthopaedic department within a tertiary general hospital, serving patients from across the country. Among them, 49% (197 of 398) of patients were excluded for the following reasons: 8% (31 of 398) because of proximal humerus fracture, 5% (19 of 398) because of osteonecrosis, 9% (35 of 398) because of previous infective arthritis, 5% (18 of 398) because of a deformed shoulder, 4% (14 of 398) because of poor general condition after surgery, 3% (12 of 398) because of death, and another 17% (68 of 398) were lost before the minimum study follow-up, leaving 51% (201 of 398) for analysis. A preoperative acromial compromise was defined as follows: (1) thinning of the acromion (< 3 mm), which means a thickness of less than 30% of the normal acromion thickness (8 to 9 mm), and (2) acromial fragmentation. Acromial thickness was measured using a CT scan. The middle portion of the anterolateral acromion, situated lateral to the distal end of the clavicle, was crosschecked using the axial view. Measurements were subsequently performed from both coronal and sagittal views. In all, 29 patients with acromion compromise and 172 without acromion compromise met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no differential loss to follow-up before 2 years between patients with and without acromial compromise in this study (36% [16 of 45] versus 23% [52 of 224]; p = 0.12). We matched patients using propensity score, pairing them in a 1:3 ratio based on gender, age, bone mineral density, diagnosis, previous rotator cuff repair surgery, subscapularis repair or latissimus dorsi transfer performed during surgery, the type of prosthesis used, and follow-up duration. Twenty-three patients with acromial compromise (acromion compromised group) and 69 patients without acromial compromise (normal control group) were matched; the mean ± SD duration of follow-up was 40 ± 22 months in those with acromial compromise and 43 ± 19 months the in normal control group. Pre- and postoperative functional outcome scores, ROM, and shoulder strength were compared. Shoulder scaption refers to lifting the arm in the scapular plane, and scaption strength was measured by applying upward force with the arm at 90° while seated, pushing it as far as possible and measured using a handheld myometer. Complications, including acromial insufficiency fracture, scapular notching, dislocation, periprosthetic infection, and overall risk of complication, were analyzed. Acromial insufficiency fracture was diagnosed based on clinical and radiological findings. Clinically, sudden pain and tenderness at the acromion along with reduced shoulder elevation raised acromial insufficiency fracture suspicion. Radiologically, acromion tilt on plain radiograph or fracture line on coronal CT view confirmed diagnosis of acromial insufficiency fracture. RESULTS: Comparing both groups, patients with a compromised acromion had no difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (60 ± 12 versus 64 ± 12; mean difference -4 [95% CI -11 to 2]; p = 0.16), Constant scores (48 ± 10 versus 54 ± 12; mean difference -6 [95% CI -13 to 0]; p = 0.06), forward flexion degree (125 ± 24 versus 130 ± 21; mean difference -5 [95% CI -16 to 6]; p = 0.36), and scaption strength (5 ± 3 versus 6 ± 3; mean difference -1 [95% CI -3 to 0]; p = 0.13). Having acromial compromise was not associated with increased risk of overall complications (30% [7 of 23] versus 19% [13 of 69], relative risk 2 [95% CI 1 to 4]; p = 0.26). However, the only complication that was higher in the acromial compromised group was infection (13% [3 of 23] versus 0% [0 of 69], relative risk not available; p = 0.01). Only the lateralized glenoid prosthesis demonstrated negative association with the acromial insufficiency fracture occurrence; no other factors showed an association. The use of lateralized glenoid prostheses was not observed in patients with acromial insufficiency fracture (0% [0 of 7] acromial insufficiency fracture versus 39% [33 of 85] no acromial insufficiency fracture, relative risk 0 [95% CI 0]; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: In patients with acquired acromial compromise-such as thinning or fragmented acromion because of advanced cuff tear arthropathy or previous acromioplasty-primary RSA resulted in no different functional outcome score, ROM, shoulder strength, and overall complications compared with patients without acromial compromise. Our findings suggest that a thin or fragmented acromion may not necessarily be exclusion criteria for RSA, potentially aiding surgeons in their decision-making process when treating these patients. However, one of the major complications, postoperative infection, is more frequently observed in patients with acquired acromial compromise. Pre- and postoperative caution would be necessary to prevent and detect infection even when short-term outcomes are favorable in this study. Further studies with large cohorts and long-term follow-up durations are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Fabrication of atelocollagen-coated bioabsorbable suture and the evaluation of its regenerative efficacy in Achilles tendon healing using a rat experimental model.

Recently, the incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) has become more common, and repair surgery using a bioabsorbable suture is generally preferred, particularly in the case of healthy patients. Sutures composed of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are commonly used in ATR surgeries. Nevertheless, owing to the inherent limitations of PLGA, novel bioabsorbable sutures that can accelerate Achilles tendon healing are sought. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of atelocollagen on tendon healing. In this study, poly(3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine) (pDOPA), a hydrophilic biomimetic material, was used to modify the hydrophobic surface of a PLGA suture (Vicryl, VC) for the stable coating of atelocollagen on its surface. The main objective was to fabricate an atelocollagen-coated VC suture and evaluate its performance in the healing of Achilles tendon using a rat model of open repair for ATR. Structural analyses of the surface-modified suture indicated that the collagen was successfully coated on the VC/pDOPA suture. Postoperative in vivo biomechanical analysis, histological evaluation, ultrastructural/morphological analyses, and western blotting confirmed that the tendons in the VC/pDOPA/Col group exhibit superior healing than those in the VC and VC/pDOPA groups after 1 and 6 weeks following the surgery. The this study suggests that atelocollagen-coated PLGA/pDOPA sutures are preferable for future medical applications, especially in the repair of ATR.

Atelocollagen Injection During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair for Small- to Medium-Sized Subacute or Chronic Rotator Cuff Tears Enhances Radiographic Tendon Integrity: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and structural outcomes of using injectable atelocollagen during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients with small- to medium-sized full-thickness tears who underwent ARCR from 2016 to 2022 with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to reduce bias. Tendon integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at postoperative 6 months. Clinical and structural outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: After PS matching, this study included 181 pairs of patients comparing ARCR with atelocollagen injection and without atelocollagen injection. Range of motion, muscle strength, and functional outcomes were significantly improved in both the atelocollagen group and the control group. Forward elevation and external rotation were significantly worse in the atelocollagen group compared with the control group at 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up. In total, 125 patients (69.1%) in the atelocollagen group and 130 patients (71.8%) in the control group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score without a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .509). The mean value of Sugaya grade on postoperative MRI evaluation was 2.03 ± 0.81 for the atelocollagen group and 2.24 ± 0.97 for the control group, with a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .027). Tendon healing failure was observed in 12 patients (6.6%) in the atelocollagen group and 19 patients (10.5%) in the control group, with no statistical difference between the 2 groups (P = .189). CONCLUSIONS: Atelocollagen injection during ARCR for small- to medium-sized subacute or chronic rotator cuff tears did not show a benefit in clinical outcomes. However, postoperative MRI showed significantly lower Sugaya grade compared with the control group, with no significant difference in retear rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Long-term Effectiveness and Outcome-Determining Factors of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recreational Sports Population: An Assessment of 100 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 12.7 Years.

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have reported the long-term effectiveness of and associated factors for recurrence of anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR). PURPOSE: To report the long-term clinical outcomes after ABR in a recreational sports population and identify the associated factors that influence the final instability status. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in patients treated with ABR between 2007 and 2013 by a single surgeon. Patient data, magnetic resonance imaging measurements of bone loss and glenoid track, and intra- and perioperative factors were analyzed. After a minimum follow-up of 10 years, patient-reported outcomes including the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score, the Rowe score, the visual analog scale for pain and function, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and sports activity were assessed. The current instability status was classified into 3 groups: stable, apprehensive, and redislocated. These groups were statistically compared with respect to outcomes and associated factors. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with a mean age of 22.4 ± 5.5 years and a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 2.1 years were included. At the final follow-up, 38 patients (38%) showed recurrent symptoms: 19 patients (19%) with subjective apprehension and 19 patients (19%) with redislocation, including 10 patients (10%) with revision surgery. At the final follow-up, the redislocated group showed the lowest patient-reported outcomes and return to sports (both P < .001). The apprehensive group also showed a lower Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score (P = .011), Rowe score (P = .003), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (P = .027), and return to sports (P = .005) than the stable group. Participation in contact sports (P = .026), glenoid bone loss (P = .005), size of Hill-Sachs lesion (P = .009), and off-track lesions (P = .016) were all associated with recurrent symptoms, whereas age <20 years (P = .012), participation in contact sports (P = .003), and off-track lesions (P = .042) were associated with redislocation. CONCLUSION: After long-term follow-up in a recreational sports population, ABR demonstrated a 19% rate of subjective apprehension and 19% rate of redislocation, with a gradual decline in clinical outcomes and sports activity over time. Therefore, candidates for ABR should be selected based on consideration of risk factors such as off-track lesions, age <20 years, and participation in contact sports.

Clinical and Structural Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Over 75 Years Are Comparable to Those in Younger Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and structural outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in patients over 75 years and those under 75 years and to analyze the factors associated with retear and clinical outcomes after ARCR. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patients who underwent ARCR between 2011 and 2021 with at least 2 years of follow-up. Using propensity score matching for sex, tear size, subscapularis involvement, and follow-up time, this study included 54 patients older than 75 years (group A) and 54 patients younger than 75 years (group B). Cuff integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Structural and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean improvements in external rotation (P = .030) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (P = .043) were significantly higher in group A. Visual analog scales for pain and function, ASES score, and Constant score were significantly improved in both groups (all P = .001). On routine postoperative MRI at 6 months, the retear rate was 20.4% (11/54) in group A and 18.5% (10/54) in group B with no statistical difference between the 2 groups (P = .808). Factor analysis in group A showed that follow-up duration (P = .019), tear size in mediolateral dimension (P = .037), occupation ratio (P = .036), and incomplete repair (P = .034) were associated with retear, and mild glenohumeral arthritis (P = .003) and subscapularis involvement (P = .018) were associated with inferior Constant score. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and structural outcomes after ARCR in patients aged 75 years or older are comparable to those in patients younger than 75 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Diagnostic Performance of Belly-Press Angle in Predicting the Severity of Subscapularis Tear.

BACKGROUND: Neglected partial subscapularis tears often cause functional impairment even after repair of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear is done. Numerous physical examinations for detecting partial subscapularis tears have been described in previous studies. PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between the preoperative clinical features and the severity of a partial subscapularis tear and to provide diagnostic clues for patients requiring subscapularis repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: This retrospective study included 286 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery between 2020 and 2022. Preoperative clinical features, including range of motion, functional scores, muscle strength ratio, modified belly-press test (measuring belly-press angle), and bear-hug test, were collected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation was done according to the Yoo and Rhee classification. Types of subscapularis tear, supraspinatus lesion, and biceps lesion were recorded during arthroscopic surgery. A comparison of preoperative clinical features between the no-repair group (type 2A or less) and surgical repair group (type 2B or more) was done. The optimal cutoff value of the belly-press angle was determined and the diagnostic performance of the belly-press angle, bear-hug test, and MRI were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among 286 patients, 189 (66.1%) had subscapularis tears with type 2A or more. There was a significant difference in muscle strength ratio of the belly-press (P < .001), belly-press angle (P < .001), and bear-hug test (P < .001) between the no-repair group (type 2A or less) and the surgical repair group (type 2B or more). With a belly-press angle of 15° as a new cutoff value, the modified belly-press test showed 67.6% sensitivity, 73.9% specificity, and 69.6% accuracy in detecting type 2B or higher subscapularis tear. CONCLUSION: Patients with type 2A and 2B subscapularis tears (according to the Yoo and Rhee classification) showed differences in belly-press strength ratio, belly-press angle, and bear-hug test. The cutoff value of the 15° belly-press angle showed an accuracy of 69.6% in detecting subscapularis tears with type 2B or higher.

Arthroscopic Incomplete Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation Using Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has been shown promising clinical outcomes. However, large to massive rotator cuff tears are difficult to completely repair with appropriate tension because of their size or poor tissue quality. An incomplete repair using the "hybrid technique" is one of way to solve this problem by maximizing the contact area between the tendon and the footprint of greater tuberosity. Additionally, the acellular dermal matrix patch augmentation has emerged as an adjuvant technique to enhance the biomechanical properties to promote healing of the repaired construct. This Technical Note describes arthroscopic incomplete rotator cuff repair using the "hybrid technique" with acellular dermal matrix patch augmentation.

Leg-length discrepancy and associated risk factors after paediatric femur shaft fracture: a multicentre study.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate leg-length discrepancy (LLD) and associated risk factors after paediatric femur shaft fractures. METHODS: A total of 72 consecutive patients under 13 years old (mean age 6.7 years; 48 boys, 24 girls) with unilateral femur shaft fracture, and a minimum follow-up of 18 months, were included. The amount of LLD was calculated by subtracting the length of the uninjured from that of the injured limb. Risk factors for an LLD ≥ 1 cm and ≥ 2 cm were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Hip spica casting, titanium elastic nailing and plating were performed on 22, 40 and ten patients, respectively. The mean LLD was 7.8 mm (sd 8.8) and 29 (40.3%) had a LLD of ≥ 1 cm, while nine (12.5%) had a LLD of ≥ 2 cm. There were significant differences in fracture stability (p = 0.005) and treatment methods (p = 0.011) between patients with LLD < 1 cm and ≥ 1 cm. There were significant differences in fracture site shortening (p < 0.001) and LLD (p < 0.001) between patients with length-stable and length-unstable fractures. Fracture stability was the only factor associated with LLD ≥ 1 cm (odds ratio of 4.0; p = 0.020) in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that fracture stability was significantly associated with LLD after paediatric femur shaft fractures. Therefore, the surgeon should consider the possibility of LLD after length-stable femur shaft fracture in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III.