A multicenter, retrospective comparison of pregnancy outcomes between groups of preterm labor nulliparous mothers treated with atosiban vs. ritodrine in singleton and multiple pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of atosiban and ritodrine in pregnant women who were hospitalized for threatened preterm labor (TPL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diagnosis records of preterm labor and subsequent pregnancy-related records and medical records of newborns were extracted from the Clinical Data Warehouse of the Catholic Medical Center's affiliated hospital. Since 2009, cases of preterm labor diagnosed before 34 weeks of pregnancy for first-time mothers who delivered at any one of three hospitals and who received drug treatment for more than 2 days to delay delivery were included in the dataset. Based on characteristics of Korea's national health insurance system, the drug treatment after diagnosis of preterm labor could be classified into cases using only ritodrine (571 women), cases using only atosiban (244 women), and cases where ritodrine treatment was started and then changed to atosiban (275 women). Demographic factors, obstetric outcomes, neonatal outcomes of the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The duration and maintenance of pregnancy were found to be similar between the two groups, although the initial cervical length was significantly shorter in the atosiban cohort (AC). Only in multifetal pregnancies, the maintenance of pregnancy was significantly longer in the AC. The total duration of pregnancy did not show any significant difference between the two groups regardless of singleton or multiple pregnancy. However, the distribution graph showed non-responders in the ritodrine cohort (RC). Our study showed a difference in neonatal birth weight of singleton between the two groups. The length of hospitalization and the NICU admission rate were also significantly higher in the RC for singleton. Although not significant, the proportion of numbers with an Apgar score less than 7 was higher in the RC. Neonatal death was more common in the RG (8 cases in AC and 18 cases in RC). CONCLUSIONS: Using atosiban for TPL is more effective than using ritodrine for maintaining pregnancy in the case of a multifetal pregnancy. In singleton pregnancies, neonatal outcomes of the atosiban group were superior to those of the ritodrine group. There seems to be a non-responder group when using ritodrine for TPL. Further studies are needed to determine causes of non-responders of ritodrine and effects of ritodrine on the fetus.

Optimizing the Diagnostic Strategy to Identify Genetic Abnormalities in Miscarriage.

INTRODUCTION: The single most common cause of miscarriage is genetic abnormality. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a prospective cohort study to compare the performance of conventional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) using array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) to identify genetic abnormalities in miscarriage specimens. METHODS: A total of 63 miscarriage specimens were included. Conventional karyotyping, array-CGH, and SNP-array were performed and the results compared. RESULTS: Genetic abnormalities were detected in 31 cases (49.2%) by at least one testing modality. Single autosomal trisomy was the most common defect (71.0%), followed by polyploidy (16.1%), multiple aneuploidy (9.7%), and monosomy X (3.2%). Mosaicisms were identified in four cases and confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using appropriate probes. SNP-array had a higher detection rate of genetic abnormalities than array-CGH (93.5 vs. 77.4%), and conventional karyotyping had the lowest detection rate (76.0%). SNP-array enabled the detection of all types of genetic abnormalities, including polyploidy. CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional karyotyping and FISH are still needed, SNP-array represents the first choice for miscarriage because the technique showed excellent performance in the detection of genetic abnormalities and minimized the probability of testing failure as well as time, costs, and labor.

Laparoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage: Case report of a woman without exocervix at 11 weeks gestation.

Cervical incompetence is characterized by painless dilatation of the incompetent cervix and results in miscarriages and preterm delivery during second trimester. We report a 25-year-old patient, gravid 2, para 1, at 11 weeks' gestation with the diagnosis of cervical incompetence, in whom transvaginal cerclage was not technically possible and laparoscopic cervical cerclage was performed successfully. There were no operative or immediate postoperative complications. A healthy infant was delivered at 35 weeks by cesarean section. Laparoscopic cervical cerclage during pregnancy can be safe and effective treatment for well-selected patients with cervical incompetence and eliminates the need for open laparotomy.