Genetic Polymorphisms rs699947, rs1570360, and rs3025039 on the VEGF Gene Are Correlated with Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis and Ischemic Stroke.

Extracranial internal carotid artery (ECICA) stenosis is a modifiable risk factor of ischemic stroke. VEGF plays a crucial role in the maintenance of endothelial integrity and physiological function. This study was designed to assess the correlations of VEGF polymorphisms with ECICA stenosis in ischemic stroke and to explore the relationships between these polymorphisms and different biochemical parameters. This study included a total of 650 ischemic stroke patients, 232 with ECICA stenosis while 418 had no ECICA stenosis as assessed by magnetic resonance angiography. Three SNPs in the VEGF gene, rs699947, rs1570360, and rs3025039, were assessed by real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis. Serum samples were analyzed for biochemical parameters in an automated clinical chemistry analyzer in the Laboratory Medicine Department. The CA and CA+AA (A allele bearing) genotype frequencies of the rs699947 polymorphism (AOR=1.46 and 1.47, respectively) and the GA genotype frequency of the rs1570360 polymorphism (AOR=7.33) showed a significant association with ECICA stenosis. However, the haplotype frequencies of C-A-A, T-A-C, and T-A-A (rs302503-rs1570360-rs699947) were significantly different between patients who experienced stroke with and stroke without ECICA stenosis. We found that the total homocysteine (tHcy) levels of stroke patients with ECICA stenosis with rs1570360 and rs699947 SNPs were significantly different compared to the wild-type reference genotype. In conclusion, VEGF rs699947 and rs3025039 polymorphisms were associated with increased risk of stroke, while rs1570360 and rs699947 were associated with stroke and ECICA stenosis.

To do or not to do; dilemma of intra-arterial revascularization in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: There has still been lack of evidence for definite imaging criteria of intra-arterial revascularization (IAR). Therefore, IAR selection is left largely to individual clinicians. In this study, we sought to investigate the overall agreement of IAR selection among different stroke clinicians and factors associated with good agreement of IAR selection. METHODS: From the prospectively registered data base of a tertiary hospital, we identified consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke. IAR selection based on the provided magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and clinical information were independently performed by 5 independent stroke physicians currently working at 4 different university hospitals. MRI results were also reviewed by 2 independent experienced neurologists blinded to clinical data and physicians' IAR selection. The Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) was calculated on initial DWI and MTT. We arbitrarily used ASPECTS differences between DWI and MTT (D-M ASPECTS) to quantitatively evaluate mismatch. RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement of IAR selection was fair (kappa = 0.398). In patients with DWI-ASPECTS >6, interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial (0.398-0.620). In patients with D-M ASPECTS >4, interobserver agreement was moderate to almost perfect (0.532-1.000). Patients with higher DWI or D-M ASPECTS had better agreement of IAR selection. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that DWI-ASPSECTS >6 and D-M ASPECTS >4 had moderate to substantial agreement of IAR selection among different stroke physicians. However, there is still poor agreement as to whether IAR should not be performed in patients with lower DWI and D-M ASPECTS.