Elastic limits in torsion of reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments.

INTRODUCTION: Reciprocating angle and torsional load at the superelastic limit were investigated for nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments used with reciprocating movements. METHODS: Two reciprocating NiTi instruments (Reciproc R25 [VDW, Munich, Germany] and WaveOne Primary [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland]) and ProTaper F2 (Dentsply Maillefer) were tested for 2 torsional conditions using a custom-designed testing device. Rotational angles were applied, and generated torque values were recorded. The first test condition fixed the files at 5 mm and repetitively rotated them with gradually increasing angles up to 250° (n = 10). The second test subjected the files to a single continuous rotation until fracture (n = 10). The superelastic limits of the instruments were determined from their torque-rotation curves. Statistical analysis was performed (Kruskal-Wallis) at a 95% significance level. The tested specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: It was found that the angle at the superelastic limit was higher for R25 and Primary files than the ProTaper file (P < .05). Repetitive torsional loading with a gradually increasing rotational angle reduced the torsional resistance compared with the single rotation motion. At the 5-mm fixation level all files had superelastic limit angles higher than the 170° set in the dedicated reciprocating motor. The scanning electron microscopic analysis showed features of torsional failure. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the 170° set angle of dedicated motors for reciprocating file systems is safe at the 5-mm level. Reuse of reciprocating systems, even with the movements within the elastic limit, may cause deterioration of the instruments.

Safety of the factory preset rotation angle of reciprocating instruments.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the torsional resistance of 2 reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments (Reciproc [VDW, Munich, Germany] and WaveOne [Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland]) operated at the maximum rotating angle in a proprietary motor. METHODS: With the file tip secured at various levels (3, 4, or 5 mm) of Reciproc R25 and WaveOne Primary, the distortion angles and torsional loads were monitored during counterclockwise movement at 2 rpm until fracture (n = 10 at each level) for a load-distortion graph. The rotation angles and loads at the beginning point of the plateau, the ultimate torsional strength, final fracture angle, and toughness were determined. The data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test at α = .05. The lateral longitudinal aspect and the fracture cross-section of each specimen were examined by scanning electron microscopy after the test. RESULTS: The rotation angle at the beginning point of the plateau was significantly greater for a binding site farther away from the tip of the instrument for both systems (P < .05), and all were greater than 170° (preset in the dedicated motor from manufacturer). The ultimate strength and toughness also increased significantly at levels farther away from the instrument tip (P < .05). All specimens showed typical topographic features of torsional fracture, including the circular abrasion marks and fibrous dimples near the rotation center after the test. CONCLUSIONS: It was determined that the 2 brands of reciprocating files are safe when operated at the rotational angle in the proprietary motor.