Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 146(12): 1435-1440, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36026554

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: The use of saliva samples for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection offers several advantages, including ease of sample collection, feasibility of self-collection, and minimization of medical staff exposure to infection. The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants has had an impact on the viral load of specimens and the results of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR). OBJECTIVE.­: To compare nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 using rRT-PCR. DESIGN.­: In this study, participants were recruited prospectively, and paired nasopharyngeal swab and saliva samples were collected simultaneously from each participant. After adding universal transport medium, RNA was extracted in an identical manner for both sample types, and samples were tested using rRT-PCR. In addition, samples with positive results were tested for SARS-CoV-2 variants. RESULTS.­: Of the 338 paired samples, 100 nasopharyngeal swab and 101 saliva samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The rRT-PCR results of the saliva and nasopharyngeal swab samples showed a positive percent agreement of 95.0% (95% CI, 88.7%-98.4%), a negative percent agreement of 97.9% (95% CI, 95.2%-99.3%), and an overall percent agreement of 96.8% (95% CI, 94.3%-98.4%). SARS-CoV-2 was detected in the saliva samples of 6 participants with negative nasopharyngeal sample results. In addition, the sensitivity of saliva samples was similar to that of nasopharyngeal samples for detecting various SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the Omicron variant. CONCLUSIONS.­: Saliva samples can be used as an alternative to nasopharyngeal samples for convenient and effective detection of various SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Saliva/chemistry , COVID-19/diagnosis , Specimen Handling/methods , Nasopharynx , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis
2.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0258394, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34618868

ABSTRACT

Rapid antigen (Ag) tests for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) provide quick results, do not require specialized technical skills or infrastructure, and can be used as a point-of-care method to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The performance of a magnetic force-assisted electrochemical immunoassay-based test, namely the MARK-B COVID-19 Ag test (BBB, Sungnam, Republic of Korea), was evaluated using 170 nasopharyngeal swab specimens and compared to that of RT-PCR and commercial rapid Ag test (STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test, SD Biosensor, Suwon-si, Republic of Korea). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the MARK-B test were 90.0% (95% CI 79.4%-96.2%) and 99.0% (95% CI 95.0%-99.9%), respectively, with a kappa coefficient of 0.908. The correlations between the electrical current values of MARK-B and the Ct values of RT-PCR were -0.898 (E gene, 95% CI -0.938 to -0.834) and -0.914 (RdRp gene, 95% CI -0.948 to -0.860), respectively. The limit of detection of the MARK-B was measured using the viral culture reference samples and found to be 1 x 102 pfu/mL. The magnetic force-assisted electrochemical immunoassay-based Ag test can be used to rapidly detect SARS-CoV-2 infections, and the corresponding fully automated portable device can provide easy readability and semi-quantitative results.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Serological Testing , COVID-19 , Electrochemical Techniques , Magnetic Fields , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , Humans , Immunoassay , Republic of Korea
3.
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem ; 75(3): 451-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21389631

ABSTRACT

There are phenotypic differences between Korean native pig (KNP) and Yorkshire (YS) breeds due to different interests in selection. YS has been selected for industrial interests such as a growth rate and lean meat production, while KNP has been maintained as a regional breed with local interests such as disease resistance and fat content in and between muscle. A comparison of gene expression profiles from liver tissue reflected overall long-term effects of artificial selection for these two pig breeds. Based on minimum positive false discovery rate (less than 10%) and fold change (|FC|>1.5), 73 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Functional analysis of these DEGs indicated clear distinctions in signaling capacity related to epidermal growth factor (EGF), extracellular structure, protein metabolism, and detoxification. Hepatic DEGs demonstrated the importance of hormonal and metabolic capabilities to differences between these two pig breeds.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Liver/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Sus scrofa , Animals , Biomarkers/analysis , Body Fat Distribution , Breeding , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Epidermal Growth Factor/genetics , Epidermal Growth Factor/metabolism , Europe , Humans , Korea , Meat , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Phylogeny , Species Specificity , Sus scrofa/genetics , Sus scrofa/metabolism
4.
Mol Cells ; 28(6): 565-73, 2009 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19937136

ABSTRACT

The pig could be a useful model to characterize molecular aspects determining several delicate phenotypes because they have been bred for those characteristics. The Korean native pig (KNP) is a regional breed in Korea that was characterized by relatively high intramuscular fat content and reddish meat color compared to other western breeds such as Yorkshire (YS). YS grew faster and contained more lean muscle than KNP. We compared the KNP to Yorksire to find molecular clues determining muscle characteristics. The comparison of skeletal gene expression profiles between these two breeds showed molecular differences in muscle. We found 82 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) defined by fold change (more than 1.5 fold difference) and statistical significance (within 5% of false discovery rate). Functional analyses of these DEGs indicated up-regulation of most genes involved in cell cycle arrest, down-regulation of most genes involved in cellular differentiation and its inhibition, down-regulation of most genes encoding component of muscular-structural system, and up-regulation of most genes involved in diverse metabolism in KNP. Especially, DEGs in above-mentioned categories included a large number of genes encoding proteins directly or indirectly involved in p53 pathway. Our results indicated a possible role of p53 to determine muscle characteristics between these two breeds.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/pathology , Genes, cdc/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Transcriptional Activation/physiology , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism , Animals , Breeding , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Dietary Fats , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Male , Meat , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Species Specificity , Sus scrofa , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...