Comparison of a coupling system and the suture method in end-to-side microvascular anastomosis in head and neck reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Use of coupling devices in microvascular anastomosis continues to increase, but it is not yet actively used in end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis because there is no standard method. Therefore, we propose an easy and time-saving ETS micro-anastomosis method using coupling devices in head and neck reconstruction and compare it with the conventional suture method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 consecutive cases (43 anastomoses) of ETS anastomosis in head and neck reconstruction from 2018 to 2022. Patient characteristics, operative details, and anastomosis time were evaluated. When using the coupling device, a cross incision was created in the recipient vessel to form vascular flaps. By pulling the flaps out of the ring, the intact vessel lining was fixed. Other procedures were the same as for a traditional anastomosis. RESULTS: The mean anastomosis time was 12.81 min (range, 6.7-24.87) for the suture and 4.96 min (range, 2.02-9.4) for the coupling device, a statistically significant difference (p-value <.00005). There was no venous insufficiency or flap failure with either method. CONCLUSIONS: ETS venous anastomosis using the coupling device is an easy-to-use, safe, and timesaving procedure for head and neck reconstruction.

Anterolateral Thigh Chimeric Flap: An Alternative Reconstructive Option to Free Flaps for Large Soft Tissue Defects.

The anterolateral thigh (ALT) skin flap provides abundant, thin, pliable skin coverage with adequate pedicle length and calibre, and tolerable donor site morbidity. However, coverage of relatively large defects using the ALT flap alone is limited. We present our experience of using the ALT flap coupled with the vastus lateralis (VL) flap supplied by the same pedicle for large defect reconstruction. Between 2016 and 2020, ten patients with extensive lower-extremity or trunk defects were treated using the ALT/VL chimeric flap. The ALT portion was used to cover the cutaneous and joint defect while the VL part was used to resurface remnant defects, and a skin graft was performed. All flaps were based on the common descending pedicle, and branches to separate the components were individually dissected. All defects were successfully reconstructed using the ALT/VL chimeric flap. No surgery-related acute complications were observed, and the patients had no clinical issues with ambulation or running activities during the long-term follow-up period. With the separate components supplied by a common vascular pedicle, the ALT/VL chimeric flap allows us to reconstruct extensive defects with joint involvement or posterior trunk lesions. Thus, the ALT/VL chimeric flap may be a suitable alternative for extensive tissue defect reconstruction.