ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common congenital thoracic venous anomaly. It is usually found incidentally on examination or during invasive procedures. In most cases, the blood flows back to the right atrium through the coronary sinus without hemodynamic abnormalities and it is usually asymptomatic. There is some controversy regarding the clinical use of PLSVC. In a few cases, a PLSVC has been used for hemodialysis or large-bore intravenous access. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old woman with a previous hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis developed hepatic failure. Owing to her worsening condition, she needed liver transplantation (LT). However, a superior vena cava thrombus was found between the right atrium and proximal superior vena cava on preoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Usually, right-sided central venous catheterization is performed for LT preparation, but the embolic risk was very high in our patient. Fortunately, she had already been diagnosed with PLSVC. Therefore, we decided to perform fluoroscopy-guided catheterization through the PLSVC. For the safe use of a PLSVC catheter during surgery, the rapid infusion system pressure, coronary sinus inflow pressure, and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography were monitored. The patient successfully underwent LT. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a literature review and this case, PLSVC can be used clinically when accompanied by a detailed history, preoperative imaging examination, and close intraoperative monitoring. We suggest that a PLSVC is a feasible alternative to central venous access for LT.
Subject(s)
Liver Transplantation , Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome , Thrombosis , Vascular Malformations , Female , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Middle Aged , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/complications , Thrombosis/complications , Vascular Malformations/complications , Vena Cava, Superior/abnormalities , Vena Cava, Superior/diagnostic imaging , Vena Cava, Superior/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emergency reoperation is considered to be a quality indicator in surgery. We analyzed the risk factors for emergency reoperations. METHODS: Patients who underwent emergency operations from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, at our hospital were reviewed in this retrospective study. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for the perioperative risk factors for emergency reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 1,481 patients underwent emergency operations during the study period. Among them, 79 patients received emergency reoperations. The variables related to emergency reoperation included surgeries involving intracranial and intraoral lesions, highest mean arterial pressure ≥ 110 mmHg, highest heart rate ≥ 100 beats/min, anemia, duration of operation >120 min, and arrival from the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSIONS: The type of surgery, hemodynamics, hemoglobin values, the duration of surgery, and arrival from ICU were associated with emergency reoperations.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal cancer resection recommends balanced perioperative fluid therapy. According to recent guidelines, zero-balance fluid therapy is recommended in low-risk patients, and immediate correction of low urine output during surgery is discouraged. However, several reports have indicated an association of intraoperative oliguria with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). We investigated the impact of intraoperative oliguria in the colorectal ERAS setting on the incidence of postoperative AKI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2017 to August 2019, a total of 453 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection with the ERAS protocol. Among them, 125 patients met the criteria for oliguria and were propensity score (PS) matched to 328 patients without intraoperative oliguria. After PS matching had been performed, 125 patients from each group were selected and the incidences of AKI were compared between the two groups. Postoperative kidney function and surgical outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the intraoperative oliguria group than in the non-intraoperative oliguria group (26.4% vs. 11.2%, respectively, P = 0.002). Also, the eGFR reduction on postoperative day 0 was significantly greater in the intraoperative oliguria than non-intraoperative oliguria group (-9.02 vs. -1.24 mL/min/1.73 m2 respectively, P < 0.001). In addition, the surgical complication rate was higher in the intraoperative oliguria group than in the non-intraoperative oliguria group (18.4% vs. 9.6%, respectively, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven benefits of perioperative care with the ERAS protocol, caution is required in patients with intraoperative oliguria to prevent postoperative AKI. Further studies regarding appropriate management of intraoperative oliguria in association with long-term prognosis are needed in the colorectal ERAS setting.
