Interprofessional relationships and their impact on resident hospitalizations in nursing homes: A qualitative study.

AIM: The aim of this study is to explore experiences and perspectives of nurses and providers (e.g., physicians, medical directors, fellows, and nurse practitioners) on reducing preventable hospitalizations of nursing home (NH) residents in relation to interprofessional relationship and hospitalization decision-making process. BACKGROUND: Preventable NH resident hospitalization continues to be a pressing public health issue. Studies show that improved interprofessional relationship may help reduce hospitalization, yet research on communication processes and interactions among different NH staff remains limited. METHODS: This is a qualitative descriptive study. Two focus groups were held with fourteen nurses and thirteen in-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with providers from two Chicagoland NHs. Focus group sessions and interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for common themes based on qualitative description method. RESULTS: All study participants agreed that providers have the ultimate responsibility for hospitalization decisions. However, nurses believed they could influence those decisions, depending on provider characteristics, trust, and resident conditions. Nurses and providers differed in the way they experienced and conveyed emotions, and differed in key elements affecting hospitalization decisions such as structural or environmental factors (e.g., lacking staff and equipment at the facility, poor communication between the NH and hospitals) and interpersonal factors (e.g., characteristics of effective nurses or providers and the effective interactions between them). CONCLUSIONS: Interpersonal factors, including perceived competence, respect, and trust, may influence NH hospitalization decisions and be targeted for reducing preventable hospitalizations of residents.

A risk scoring system to predict progression to severe pneumonia in patients with Covid-19.

Rapid outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) raised major concern regarding medical resource constraints. We constructed and validated a scoring system for early prediction of progression to severe pneumonia in patients with Covid-19. A total of 561 patients from a Covid-19 designated hospital in Daegu, South Korea were randomly divided into two cohorts: development cohort (N = 421) and validation cohort (N = 140). We used multivariate logistic regression to identify four independent risk predictors for progression to severe pneumonia and constructed a risk scoring system by giving each factor a number of scores corresponding to its regression coefficient. We calculated risk scores for each patient and defined two groups: low risk (0 to 8 points) and high risk (9 to 20 points). In the development cohort, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% and 78.9%. In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity were 70.8% and 79.3%, respectively. The C-statistics was 0.884 (95% CI 0.833-0.934) in the development cohort and 0.828 (95% CI 0.733-0.923) in the validation cohort. This risk scoring system is useful to identify high-risk group for progression to severe pneumonia in Covid-19 patients and can prevent unnecessary overuse of medical care in limited-resource settings.

Independent Early Childhood Education Centers' Experiences Implementing the Revised Child and Adult Care Food Program Meal Pattern Standards: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.

BACKGROUND: Nationally, approximately one-third of early childhood education centers participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) are independently owned and operated (ie, not owned by a corporation, not affiliated with Head Start, and with no food program sponsor). Independent providers are less likely to meet CACFP standards and best practices and would benefit from additional support and technical assistance. OBJECTIVE: To explore independent early childhood education center key informants' (KIs) (ie, directors or relevant staff) perspectives on implementing the revised CACFP standards. DESIGN: Following qualitative exploratory design, semistructured, in-depth, telephone interviews were conducted with KIs individually. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: In summer 2018, 30 randomly sampled KIs from independent CACFP-participating early childhood education centers serving children ages 2 to 5 years nationwide were interviewed. Participants were sampled from respondents to a previously completed nationwide survey of providers. MAIN OUTCOMES: KIs' perspectives on the CACFP program and revised meal pattern standard implementation. ANALYSIS PERFORMED: After audio recordings were professionally transcribed and reviewed, constant comparative analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti v8 qualitative software (Atlas.ti. version 8 for Windows, 2018, Scientific Software Development GmbH). RESULTS: KIs indicated that program benefits (eg, health and nutrition benefits, reimbursement, guidelines, and training) outweighed challenges experienced. Challenges associated with revised CACFP standards implementation (eg, availability or acceptability of new, creditable foods) were impacted by enhanced CACFP standards status, reported revised standards, and availability or utilization of outside support. KIs desired more contact with their state representative. KIs found the training and technical assistance on the revised standards useful and suggestions to enhance future training and technical assistance (eg, increasing accessibility, training resources, and audience-specific training). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, KIs desired additional resources, training, and increased communication from CACFP state representatives specific to CACFP-approved and reimbursable products, menu ideas, recipes, and cooking demonstrations. The present study suggests that a more tailored training and technical assistance approach is necessary as reported benefits, challenges, and program needs varied based on state-enhanced CACFP standards, reported familiarity with the revised meal pattern, and reported outside support.

Lessons from a COVID-19 hospital, Republic of Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To document the experiences of converting a general hospital to a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) designated hospital during an outbreak in Daegu, Republic of Korea. METHODS: The hospital management formed an emergency task force team, whose role was to organize the COVID-19 hospital. The task force used different collaborative channels to redistribute resources and expertise to the hospital. Leading doctors from the departments of infectious diseases, critical care and pulmonology developed standardized guidelines for treatment coherence. Nurses from the infection control team provided regular training on donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and basic safety measures. FINDINGS: Keimyung University Daegu Dongsan hospital became a red zone hospital for COVID-19 patients on 21 February 2020. As of 29 June 2020, 1048 COVID-19 patients had been admitted to the hospital, of which 22 patients died and five patients were still being treated in the recovery ward. A total of 906 health-care personnel worked in the designated hospital, of whom 402 were regular hospital staff and 504 were dispatched health-care workers. Of these health-care workers, only one dispatched nurse acquired COVID-19. On June 15, the hospital management and Daegu city government decided to reconvert the main building to a general hospital for non-COVID-19 patients, while keeping the additional negative pressure rooms available, in case of resurgence of the disease. CONCLUSION: Centralized coordination in frontline hospital operation, staff management, and patient treatment and placement allowed for successful pooling and utilization of medical resources and manpower during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Impacts of expanding provider choice for free flu vaccination among the elderly in Korea.

The Korean government, to increase the vaccination rates, implemented the policy expanding provider choice for free seasonal influenza vaccine for the elderly through contracting the provision of immunization to the private sector in 2015. Using the annual nationally representative individual between 2014-2017, this study explores the impacts of the policy change by using a difference-in-differences approach. Results show that influenza vaccine uptake at private clinics increases by 12 percentage points after the policy change. However, this effect is offset by a reduction in uptake at public health centers by 13 percentage points. As a result, we find no evidence that the policy increases overall vaccination coverage among the elderly. These results indicate that policymakers need to explore the reasons for vaccine hesitancy before delivering interventions.

Certified Nursing Assistants' Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing and Using Worksite Health Promotion Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Certified nursing assistants (CNAs) are low-wage healthcare workers who provide direct care to nursing home residents, yet also experience significant health disparities. However, limited research has been conducted on CNAs' perceived barriers and facilitators to workplace health promotion (WHP) participation. METHOD: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), 24 CNA semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted in two Chicagoland nursing homes. RESULTS: Key barriers were time-constraints and lack of staffing, lack of access to WHP programs, and limited organizational and employer support. Facilitators included the availability of WHP programs, breaks, and other workplace benefits, and enhanced leadership and familial support. CONCLUSION: An effective WHP program must attempt to minimize the work-related, organizational, and environmental barriers while supporting high motivation of CNAs in health promotion. We offer some suggestions for enhancing CNAs' WHP access and utilization.

Barriers to and Facilitators of Stocking Healthy Food Options: Viewpoints of Baltimore City Small Storeowners.

Receptivity to strategies to improve the food environment by increasing access to healthier foods in small food stores is underexplored. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with small storeowners of different ethnic backgrounds as part of a small-store intervention trial. Store owners perceived barriers and facilitators to purchase, stock, and promote healthy foods. Barriers mentioned included customer preferences for higher fat and sweeter taste and for lower prices; lower wholesaler availability of healthy food; and customers' lack of interest in health. Most store owners thought positively of taste tests, free samples, and communication interventions. However, they varied in terms of their expectations of the effect of these strategies on customers' healthy food purchases. The findings reported add to the limited data on motivating and working with small-store owners in low-income urban settings.