ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Perioperative irradiation is often combined with spine tumor surgery. Radiation is known to be detrimental to healing process of bone fusion. We tried to investigate bone fusion rate in spine tumor surgery cases with perioperative radiation therapy (RT) and to analyze significant factors affecting successful bone fusion. METHODS: Study cohort was 33 patients who underwent spinal tumor resection and bone graft surgery combined with perioperative RT. Their medical records and radiological data were analyzed retrospectively. The analyzed factors were surgical approach, location of bone graft (anterior vs. posterior), kind of graft (autologous graft vs. allograft), timing of RT (preoperative vs. postoperative), interval of RT from operation in cases of postoperative RT (within 1 month vs. after 1 month) radiation dose (above 38 Gy vs. below 38 Gy) and type of radiation therapy (conventional RT vs. stereotactic radiosurgery). The bone fusion was determined on computed tomography images. RESULT: Bone fusion was identified in 19 cases (57%). The only significant factors to affect bony fusion was the kind of graft (75% in autograft vs. 41 in allograft, p=0.049). Other factors proved to be insignificant relating to postoperative bone fusion. Regarding time interval of RT and operation in cases of postoperative RT, the time interval was not significant (p=0.101). CONCLUSION: Spinal fusion surgery which was combined with perioperative RT showed relatively low bone fusion rate (57%). For successful bone fusion, the selection of bone graft was the most important.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: D-dimer is a widely used biomarker for the initial clinical assessment of suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Here, we presented a new fluorescence (FL) D-dimer assay system, which was developed with a platform of point-of-care test (POCT) for clinical applications. METHODS: Whole blood was mixed with FL-labeled anti-D-dimer detector antibody, and then loaded onto a disposable cartridge. After 12 min of incubation, the FL intensity was acquired by scanning of test cartridge and converted as level of D-dimer in a laser FL scanner. The analytical performance of FL immunoassay was evaluated by linearity, recovery, and precision tests. The comparability of the developed assay was examined with automated reference methods. RESULTS: The FL assay system showed a good linearity, and the analytical mean recovery of control was 103% in a dynamic working range. The imprecision of intra- and inter-as-say of coefficient of variations from assay system was less than 8%. The developed FL assay system showed strong correlation with two automated reference assays, Vidas D-dimer (r = 0.973) and Stalia D-dimer (r = 0.971). CONCLUSION: The new FL immunoassay for D-dimer is a user-friendly, precise, and reproducible platform of POCT in whole blood.
Subject(s)
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Immunoassay/methods , Calibration , Chromatography, Affinity , Humans , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) are cardiac biomarkers that are widely used to assist in the early and late diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Here, we present a clinically applicable fluorescence (FL) immunoassay for cardiac biomarkers. METHODS: Whole blood was mixed with FL-labeled detector Ab (antibody) and then loaded onto a capture Ab-immobilized strip in a test cartridge. The FL intensities at test and control line on the strip were obtained and converted in a laser FL scanner to determine the concentration of biomarker. The analytical performance of immunoassay system was evaluated by linearity and imprecision tests. The comparability of the FL immunoassay method was examined with a reference method. RESULTS: FL intensities and the levels of myoglobin, CK-MB, and cTnI displayed good linearity and high correlations (r = 0.999, 0.998, and 0.989, respectively). The coefficient of variations (CVs) of imprecision for all cardiac biomarkers were less than 8% in both intra- and interassays. When the results from the developed method and bioMerieux VIDAS assay were analyzed by Bland-Altman plot and Passing-Bablok plot, the two assay methods were in good agreement. CONCLUSION: The FL immunoassay system can provide a platform for point-of-care testing (POCT), and it is an easy, fast, and reliable method for the quantification of cardiac biomarkers.
