Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(8): e70, 2024 Mar 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38442716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonographic soft markers are normal variants, rather than fetal abnormalities, and guidelines recommend a detailed survey of fetal anatomy to determine the necessity of antenatal karyotyping. Anecdotal reports have described cases with ultrasonographic soft markers in which chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) revealed pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) despite normal results on conventional karyotyping, but CMA for ultrasonographic soft markers remains a matter of debate. In this systematic review, we evaluated the clinical significance of CMA for pregnancies with isolated ultrasonographic soft markers and a normal fetal karyotype. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted by an experienced librarian through the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. We reviewed 3,338 articles (3,325 identified by database searching and 13 by a hand search) about isolated ultrasonographic soft markers, and seven ultrasonographic markers (choroid plexus cysts, echogenic bowel, echogenic intracardiac focus, hypoplastic nasal bone, short femur [SF], single umbilical artery, and urinary tract dilatation) were included for this study. RESULTS: Seven eligible articles were included in the final review. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs were found in fetuses with isolated ultrasonographic soft markers and a normal karyotype. The overall prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs was 2.0% (41 of 2,048). The diagnostic yield of CMA was highest in fetuses with isolated SF (9 of 225, 3.9%). CONCLUSION: CMA could aid in risk assessment and pregnancy counseling in pregnancies where the fetus has isolated ultrasonographic soft markers along with a normal karyotype.


Subject(s)
Fetus , Microarray Analysis , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Fetus/diagnostic imaging , Karyotyping
2.
Langmuir ; 23(21): 10438-40, 2007 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17854214

ABSTRACT

By using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we clearly show that the antimicrobial peptide affects the molecular interaction between lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and immune proteins (lipopolysaccharide binding protein [LBP] and CD14). To reconstruct an in vivo interaction, LBP and LPS (the Ra, Rc, and Re forms from Salmonella minnesota, with varying lengths of the saccharide region) were immobilized onto the AFM tip using a chemical spacer linker. We examined the interaction between the proteins on the tip and model lipid bilayer biomembranes including CD14, in both the presence and absence of the antimicrobial peptide, polymyxin B (PMB). When LPS was present, the binding force between the LBP-LPS complex and CD14 increased dramatically, compared to that seen between LBP and CD14 alone. Longer LPS saccharide regions resulted in higher binding forces. The data suggest that LPS may have an important influence on the binding of LBP to CD14 and that the saccharide region of LPS is influential in this regard. It was also found that the antimicrobial peptide PMB, at or above a particular concentration, specifically inhibited the binding between LBP-LPS and CD14.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/metabolism , Microscopy, Atomic Force/methods , Peptides/metabolism , Proteins/metabolism , Anti-Infective Agents/antagonists & inhibitors , Peptides/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Binding , Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...