Effect on Overall Health Status With Weightbearing at 2 Weeks vs 6 Weeks After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Ongoing controversy exists on postoperative weightbearing status after open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare patient-based and physician-based outcomes after early weightbearing at 2 vs 6 weeks postoperatively. METHODS: Fifty patients with unstable rotational-type ankle fractures were treated operatively with subsequent immobilization in a below-the-knee cast for 2 weeks and were then randomly allocated to 2 groups. The first group had early weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperation and the second group at 6 weeks postoperation. Follow-up included subjective and objective evaluations performed at 2, 6, 12, and 26 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was the patient-based general health status as measured with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) scoring system. Secondary outcome was the Olerud and Molander ankle score. Power analysis revealed a study group of 50 patients was needed to show a clinically relevant effect size of 10 points in both EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) score and Olerud and Molander score. RESULTS: Patients in the early weightbearing group had higher mean EQ-5D VAS scores at a 6-week follow-up (P = .014) of 77 ± 14 compared to 66 ± 15 for late mobilization. No difference was found at other follow-up points or between groups for physician-based outcome measures. At 26 weeks postoperatively, mean Olerud and Molander ankle scores were similar at 84 ± 16 and 81 ± 17 for mobilization at 2 and 6 weeks postoperation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early weightbearing after operative fixation of rotational-type ankle fractures had a clinically relevant and statistically significant benefit in patient-based general health status, as quantified with EQ-5D VAS scores, at 6 weeks postoperation. These results contribute to our understanding of early weightbearing and may encourage consideration of weightbearing at 2 weeks postoperatively in standard protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Improving clinical examination in acute tibial fractures by enhancing visual cues: the case for always 'cutting back' a tibial back-slab and marking the dorsalis pedis pulse.

Look, feel, move is a simple and widely taught sequence to be followed when undertaking a clinical examination in orthopaedics (Maher et al., 1994; McRae, 1999; Solomon et al., 2010). The splinting of an acute tibial fracture with a posterior back-slab is also common practice; with the most commonly taught design involving covering the dorsum of the foot with bandaging (Charnley, 1950; Maher et al., 1994; McRae, 1989). We investigated the effect of the visual cues provided by exposing the dorsum of the foot and marking the dorsalis pedis pulse. We used a clinical simulation in which we compared the quality of the recorded clinical examination undertaken by 30 nurses. The nurses were randomly assigned to assess a patient with either a traditional back-slab or one in which the dorsal bandaging had been cut back and the dorsalis pedis pulse marked. We found that the quality of the recorded clinical examination was significantly better in the cut-back group. Previous studies have shown that the cut-back would not alter the effectiveness of the back-slab as a splint (Zagorski et al., 1993). We conclude that all tibial back-slabs should have the bandaging on the dorsum of the foot cut back and the location of the dorsalis pedis pulse marked. This simple adaptation will improve the subsequent clinical examinations undertaken and recorded without reducing the back-slab's effectiveness as a splint.

A novel primary care clinical prediction rule for early detection of osteoporosis.

The effects of osteoporosis (OP) can be significantly slowed if disease is detected early. We report on a clinical risk prediction rule developed from patient histories taken in an orthopaedic outpatient clinic, before confirmatory testing for OP. Data were extracted from routine audits of consecutive records of patients with recent wrist fracture, comprising demographic details, medications, past and current disease, and fracture details. Clinical prediction rule elements were tested against clinical suspicion of OP. The clinical prediction elements comprised sex and age risk, medications that predispose patients to OP and/or falls, previous fractures and disease/medical conditions that are known OP risks. The best cut point (6.5) demonstrated 100% sensitivity with clinical suspicion of OP. Patient history information is often available before OP is clinically suspected or a definitive diagnosis is made. Our clinical prediction rule will be useful in primary care settings where objective measures of bone health are not readily available. It will raise OP awareness amongst health care providers and patients, particularly those not previously suspected of having OP. It will assist in identifying at-risk patients early and commencing them on appropriate management, without waiting for definitive bone health tests.

Multifaceted guideline implementation strategies improve early identification and management of osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis contributes significantly to fractures, subsequent disability and premature mortality in Australia. Better detection and management of osteoporosis will reduce unnecessary health expenditure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in one large tertiary metropolitan hospital, the orthopaedic health care team's approach to osteoporosis guideline implementation to improve early identification and management of osteoporosis. METHODS: This paper describes the implementation of multifaceted strategies to improve health-promoting behaviours and the uptake of osteoporosis guidelines by staff in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic at one metropolitan hospital, reflecting organisational and individual commitment to embedding guideline recommendations into routine practice. Implementation strategies were aimed at the requirements and perspectives of different stakeholder groups. Five audit datasets were compared: 62 patient records in two baseline audits, and three post-implementation audits of 31 patient records, collected over the following 3-month periods (August 2006 to April 2007). All audits used the same criteria to assess compliance with clinical guidelines, and outcomes of implementation strategies. RESULTS: There was consistent improvement in compliance with osteoporosis guidelines over the audit periods. Comparing baseline and immediate post-implementation data, there was a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in the percentage of patients with likely fragility fractures who were identified with an osteoporotic fracture. The percentage of patients who had a likely fragility fracture, with whom staff communicated about their problems and how to deal with them, increased consistently over all post-implementation audit periods. For patients with established osteoporosis who presented with fragility fractures, there was sustained improvement over the audit periods in the percentage provided with guideline-based care. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that appropriate and targeted intervention strategies can be effective if modelled on best practice guideline implementation approaches with the use of a coordinated post-fracture management approach to osteoporosis.

Evaluation of current practice: compliance with osteoporosis clinical guidelines in an outpatient fracture clinic.

Better detection and management of osteoporosis will reduce unnecessary health expenditure. A number of high quality guidelines are available to support early detection and best practice management of osteoporosis in hospital settings. However, sustainable implementation of guidelines poses practical issues in terms of structure and processes in hospitals. This paper describes an investigation into guideline compliance in one large tertiary metropolitan hospital and discusses practical elements of guideline implementation. Given the evidence of poor practice across the two audit periods, we recommend that a coordinated clinical pathway be implemented in the fracture clinic, supported by a targeted and discipline-specific training program. Small steps towards improving awareness and management of osteoporosis in patients presenting for the first time with non-trauma wrist fracture may well produce large cost savings by future fracture prevention.