Dynamics of diabetes-associated autoantibodies in young children with human leukocyte antigen-conferred risk of type 1 diabetes recruited from the general population.

This study characterized the dynamics of islet cell antibodies (ICA), insulin antibodies (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), and IA-2 antibodies (IA-2A) in 1006 children recruited from the general population due to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQB1-conferred risk for type 1 diabetes (T1D). By the age of 5 yr, 13.8% of the children had had one or more autoantibodies in at least one sample drawn at 3- to 12-month intervals from birth, whereas 6.1% had had one or more of the three autoantibodies to biochemically defined antigens in at least two consecutive samples. The cumulative frequencies of positivity for at least two antibodies ranged from 3.2-4.4%. Seventy-five children (7.5%) had at least once ICA, 83 (8.3%) had IAA, 46 (4.6%) had GADA, and 33 (3.3%) had IA-2A. IAA were transient more frequently than the other antibodies (P < or = 0.03) and fluctuated between positivity and negativity more often than ICA (P = 0.001). The genetically high risk children were positive for each autoantibody reactivity more often (P < or = 0.03) than the moderate risk subjects. Thirteen of the 1006 children (1.3%) presented with T1D by the age of 5 yr. The most sensitive predictors of T1D were ICA and IAA, whereas the most specific predictor was IA-2A. Positivity for at least two autoantibodies of IAA, GADA, and IA-2A had the highest positive predictive value for T1D (34%). We conclude that the frequency of various diabetes-associated autoantibodies increases at a relatively stable rate at least up to the age of 5 yr. Persistent positivity for two or more autoantibodies appears to reflect destructive progressive beta-cell autoimmunity, whereas positivity for a single autoantibody may represent harmless nonprogressive or even regressive beta-cell autoimmunity.

Signs of beta-cell autoimmunity and HLA-defined diabetes susceptibility in the Finnish population: the sib cohort from the Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the role of HLA-defined genetic diabetes susceptibility in the appearance of signs of beta-cell autoimmunity in a series of children derived from the general population. METHODS: Tests for five HLA DQB1 alleles and four diabetes-associated autoantibodies were carried out on 1,584 older sibs of infants with an increased HLA-defined genetic risk of Type 1 diabetes. The DQB1 genotypes were classified into those conferring high (* 02/0302), moderate (* 0302/x; where x indicates * 0302 or a non-defined allele), low (* 0301/0302, * 02/0301, * 02/x, * 0302/0602, * 0302/0603; where x indicates * 02 or a non-defined allele) or decreased risk (other genotypes). RESULTS: Both islet cell antibodies (ICA) and GAD65 antibodies (GADA) were more frequent among the sibs with the high-risk genotype than among those with a low or decreased risk. Insulin autoantibodies and IA-2 antibodies (IA-2A) were more prevalent in the high-risk than low-risk sibs. Sibs with moderate-risk genotypes tested positive for ICA, GADA and IA-2A more often than sibs with genotypes conferring decreased risk. Autoantibody titres were also dependent on the genetic risk with high risk sibs having the highest values. Sibs carrying high-risk or moderate-risk genotypes tested positive for multiple antibodies (> or =2) more often than did the sibs with low or decreased genetic risk. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The data show that HLA-defined susceptibility to Type 1 diabetes has an effect on both the quality and quantity of humoral beta-cell autoimmunity in unaffected children derived from the general population.

Natural history of beta-cell autoimmunity in young children with increased genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes recruited from the general population.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and predictive value of diabetes-associated autoantibodies, such as islet cell antibodies (ICA) and autoantibodies to insulin (IAA), GAD65 (GADA), and the IA-2 molecule (IA-2A) in genetically susceptible children from the general population during the first 2 yr of life. Of 12,170 newborn infants, 1,005 with increased genetic risk of type 1 diabetes (high risk, human leukocyte antigen DQB1*02/*0302; moderate risk, DQB1*0302/x, where x = other than *02, *0301, or *0602) were monitored for ICA, IAA, GADA, and IA-2A at 3- to 6-month intervals from birth up to a minimum age of 2 yr. In addition, all 15 genetically susceptible children from the general population who had participated in regular immunological follow-up and developed clinical type 1 diabetes by the end of April 2000 were analyzed for the development of autoantibodies. Among 1,005 children, 63 (6.3%) tested positive for at least one autoantibody, 31 for ICA (3.1%), 48 for IAA (4.8%), 23 for GADA (2.3%), and 13 for IA-2A (1.3%) at least once by the age of 2 yr. Both ICA and IAA identified 95% [95% confidence interval (CI), 77.2-99.9%] of those who tested persistently positive for multiple (> or = 2) antibodies at the age of 2 yr, GADA identified 86% (CI, 65.1-97.1%), and IA-2A identified 55% (CI, 32.2-75.6%). Close to half of the antibody-positive children (29 of 63) reverted back to antibody negativity. Autoantibodies disappeared more often among those who tested positive for IAA than among those who tested positive for other autoantibodies (P < or = 0.021). Among the 15 children who developed type 1 diabetes, the disease sensitivity of ICA was 80% (CI, 51.9-95.7%), that of IAA was 93% (CI, 68.0-99.8%), that of GADA was 60% (CI, 32.3-83.7%), and that of IA-2A was 40% (CI, 16.3-67.7%). These results suggest that IAA are characterized by high sensitivity, early appearance, and high frequency of transient antibody positivity, whereas ICA detected with a thoroughly standardized assay appear to be more specific for the screening of beta-cell autoimmunity in young children with increased genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes in the Finnish population, which has the highest incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world.

The first signs of beta-cell autoimmunity appear in infancy in genetically susceptible children from the general population: the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Study.

Little is known about the timing of the etiological events and the preclinical process of type 1 diabetes during the first years of life in the general population. In this population-based prospective birth cohort study, the appearance of diabetes-associated autoantibodies as a sign of beta-cell autoimmunity and the development of type 1 diabetes were monitored from birth. Of 25,983 newborn infants, 2,448 genetically susceptible children were monitored for islet cell antibodies (ICA) at 3- to 6-month intervals. If an infant seroconverted to ICA positivity, all his/her samples were also analyzed for insulin autoantibodies (IAA), antibodies to the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase, and antibodies to the protein tyrosine phosphatase-related IA-2 molecule. Fifteen children of those who carried the high-risk genotype (2.7%) and 23 of those who carried the moderate-risk genotype (1.2%; P = 0.019) tested positive for ICA at least once. Among those who showed positivity for at least 2 antibodies during the observation period (25 of 38), IAA appeared as the first or among the first antibodies in 22 children (88%) and emerged earlier than the other antibodies (P < 0.019 or less). The first autoantibodies appeared in the majority of the children in the fall and winter (30 of 38 vs. 8 of 38 in the spring and summer, P < 0.001). These observations suggest that young children in the general population with a strong human-leukocyte-antigen-DQ-defined genetic risk of type 1 diabetes show signs of beta-cell autoimmunity proportionally more often than those with a moderate genetic risk. IAA emerge as the first detectable antibody more commonly than any other antibody specificity, implying that insulin may be the primary antigen in most cases of human type 1 diabetes associated with the DR4-DQB1*0302 haplotype. The seasonal variation in the emergence of the first signs of beta-cell autoimmunity suggests that infectious agents may play a role in the induction of such autoimmunity.

Enterovirus antibody levels during the first two years of life in prediabetic autoantibody-positive children.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated the role of enterovirus infections in the pathogenesis of Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus by monitoring enterovirus antibody levels in prediabetic children who turned positive for diabetes-associated autoantibodies in a prospective birth cohort study. METHODS: Serial serum samples taken during prospective observation starting at birth were analysed for IgG and IgA class antibodies against enterovirus antigens including purified coxsackievirus B4, echovirus 11, poliovirus 1 and a synthetic enterovirus peptide antigen using enzyme immunoassay. Maternal samples taken at the end of the third month of pregnancy were also studied. Analyses were done from 21 childen who developed autoantibodies and from 104 autoantibody-negative control children who were matched for the time of birth, gender and HLA susceptibility alleles. For comparison, adenovirus antibodies were also analysed from all samples collected. RESULTS: IgG class enterovirus antibody levels were high in maternal samples and in cord blood in both case and control children. After birth the IgG levels decreased reaching a nadir at the age of 6 months. No IgA class antibodies were detected at birth but started to emerge postnatally. Antibody levels did not differ between the autoantibody positive and the control children during the first 6 months of life. From 6 months to 24 months of age, the autoantibody positive children had higher IgG and IgA levels against coxsackievirus B4, echovirus 11 and the synthetic enterovirus peptide antigens than control children but poliovirus 1 and adenovirus antibodies were closely similar in the two groups. The difference between children with autoantibodies and control children was predominantly seen among boys and among those with the HLA-DQB1*0302/x genotype. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our data show that children who seroconverted for diabetes-associated auto-antibodies develop stronger humoral immune responses to coxsackievirus B4, echovirus 11 and a synthetic enterovirus peptide antigen than children who remained negative for autoantibodies. Poliovirus antibodies induced by uniform vaccinations did not differ between the prediabetic and control children suggesting that the regulation of antibody responses to enteroviruses is not disturbed. Accordingly, the results imply a stronger enterovirus exposure in prediabetic children supporting the role of enteroviruses in the pathogenesis of Type I diabetes.

Disease-associated autoantibodies as predictive markers of type 1 diabetes mellitus in siblings of affected children.

The long latent preclinical period of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) makes it possible to identify individuals at increased risk for clinical DM before the beta-cell destructive process has reached the point of no return. A series of reports on the predictive value of DM-associated autoantibodies are available in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 DM, but only a few of these studies target exclusively siblings and young siblings of affected children. When planning screening of siblings for DM risk, their age needs to be considered, as predictive characteristics of autoantibodies seem to vary in different age groups. Autoimmunity may be initiated early in life and therefore early screening for signs of beta-cell autoimmunity is crucial to avoid missing young children en route to overt DM and to be able to start intervention, when clinically applicable preventive modalities become available, before the disease process has advanced too far. Young age, positivity for at least two autoantibodies, high levels of autoantibodies and low first phase insulin response are highly predictive for progression to clinical disease in initially unaffected siblings of children with type 1 DM.

Feasibility of genetic and immunological prediction of type I diabetes in a population-based birth cohort.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Population-wide genetic screening of susceptibility to multifactorial diseases will become relevant as knowledge of the pathogenesis of these diseases increases and preventive interventions are identified. METHODS: Feasibility and acceptance of neonatal genetic screening for Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus susceptibility and adherence of the at-risk children to frequent autoantibody follow-up were studied. Screening was offered to all families. The infants with HLA-DQB1 genotypes *02/*0302 and *0302/x (x not equal to *02, *0301, *0602) were invited to autoantibody follow-up. The children who developed signs of beta-cell autoimmunity were invited to a separate prevention trial. RESULTS: The parents of 31,526 babies born between November 1994 and April 1999 (94.4% of those eligible) agreed to genetic screening. We found that 4651 infants (14.8%) had increased genetic risk (2.5 to 15 times that of the general population) for Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, and 80% of them joined the autoantibody surveillance. At the age of 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, 74, 69, 68 and 76% of the at-risk children, respectively, attended the follow-up. A total of 17 of the 22 children (77%) who were born during the study period and have developed diabetes carry the risk genotypes we currently use for screening. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Population-based screening of genetic susceptibility for Type I diabetes, linked with a possibility to participate later in a prevention trial, is highly accepted in Finland and identifies about 75% of those developing diabetes at an early age. Families adhere well to the frequent measurement of signs of beta-cell autoimmunity in the children at-risk.

Short-term exclusive breastfeeding predisposes young children with increased genetic risk of Type I diabetes to progressive beta-cell autoimmunity.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to establish the relation between early infant nutrition and signs of beta-cell autoimmunity in young children. METHODS: We identified and observed from birth 2949 infants with increased genetic risk of Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (HLA DQB1*02/ *0302 or DQB1*0302/x, x = other than *02, *0301 or *0602) and monitored them for islet cell antibodies at 3 to 6 month intervals. If an infant seroconverted to islet cell antibody positivity, all of his or her samples were also analysed for autoantibodies to insulin, GAD65 (GADA) and to the protein tyrosine phosphatase related IA-2 molecule (IA-2A). Our case-control study comprises the first 65 children who seroconverted to islet cell antibody positivity before the age of 4 years and 390 control children who were islet cell antibody-negative (six control children/ case). We monitored the duration of exclusive and total breastfeeding and the age at which cows' milk was introduced. RESULTS: Infants who had been breastfed exclusively for at least 4 months had lower risk of seroconversion to positivity for IA-2A or all four autoantibodies [odds ratio (OR) 0.24; 95 % CI 0.06-0.94 and OR 0.17; 95 % CI 0.03-0.86, respectively] than those infants who had been breastfed exclusively for less than 2 months. The risk of seroconversion to positivity for IA-2A or all four autoantibodies was higher in those younger than 2 months (OR 4.37; 95 % CI 1.33-14.42 and OR 5.02; 95 % CI 1.27-19.89) or aged 2 to 3.9 months (OR 5.50; 95 % CI 1.21-25.04 and 6.19; 95% CI 1.10-34.84) when they first received cows' milk than in those aged 4 months or older. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These observations suggest that short-term breastfeeding and the early introduction of cows' milk-based infant formula predispose young children who are genetically susceptible to Type I diabetes to progressive signs of beta-cell autoimmunity.

Disease-associated autoantibodies as surrogate markers of type 1 diabetes in young children at increased genetic risk. Childhood Diabetes in Finland Study Group.

To evaluate the emergence of diabetes-associated autoantibodies in young children and to assess whether such antibodies can be used as surrogate markers of type 1 diabetes in young subjects at increased genetic risk, we studied 180 initially unaffected siblings (92 boys and 88 girls) of children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. All siblings were younger than 6 yr of age at the initial sampling, and they were monitored for the emergence of islet cell antibodies (ICA), insulin autoantibodies (IAA), glutamate decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), and IA-2 antibodies (IA-2A) up to the age of 6 yr and for progression to clinical type 1 diabetes up to the age of 10 yr. All 160 siblings with DNA samples available were typed for susceptible (DQB1*02 and *0302) and protective (DQB1*0301 and *0602-03) HLA DQB1 alleles. Twenty-two siblings (12.2%) tested positive for ICA in their first antibody-positive sample before the age of 6 yr, 13 (7.2%) tested positive for IAA, 15 (8.3%) tested positive for GADA, and 14 (7.8%) tested positive for IA-2A. There were 16 siblings (8.9%) who had 1 detectable autoantibody, 5 (2.8%) had 2, and 12 (6.7%) had 3 or more. In the group of 82 siblings with increased human leukocyte antigen-defined genetic susceptibility [DQB1*02/*0302, *0302/x (x = other than *02 or a protective allele), *02/y (y = other than *0302 or a protective allele)], 18 (22.0%) tested positive for ICA in their first antibody-positive sample, 10 (12.2%) tested positive for IAA, 14 (17.1%) tested positive for GADA, and 12 (14.6%) tested positive for IA-2A. One antibody was detectable in 6 siblings (7.3%), 2 were detectable in 5 (6.1%), and 3 or more were detectable in 12 (14.6%). Fifteen siblings (18.3%) presented with clinical type 1 diabetes before the age of 10 yr. All of the progressors showed increased human leukocyte antigen-defined genetic susceptibility. Thirteen of those 15 siblings, who presented with clinical type 1 diabetes before the age of 10 yr, had at least 2 antibodies detectable before the age of 6 yr (disease sensitivity, 87%; 95% confidence interval, 60-98%). Thirteen of the 17 siblings who tested positive for 2 or more autoantibodies before the age of 6 yr developed type 1 diabetes before the age of 10 yr (positive predictive value, 76%; 95% confidence interval, 50-93%). These observations suggest that disease-associated autoantibodies can well be used as surrogate markers of clinical type 1 diabetes in primary prevention trials targeting young subjects with increased genetic disease susceptibility.