Systemic biochemical markers of joint metabolism and inflammation in relation to radiographic parameters and pain of the knee: data from CHECK, a cohort of early-osteoarthritis subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate associations of biochemical markers of joint metabolism and inflammation with minimum joint space width (JSW) and osteophyte area (OP area) of knees showing no or doubtful radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) and to investigate whether these differed between painful and non-painful knees. DESIGN: Serum (s-) and urinary (u-) levels of the cartilage markers uCTX-II, sCOMP, sPIIANP, and sCS846, bone markers uCTX-I, uNTX-I, sPINP, and sOC, synovial markers sPIIINP and sHA, and inflammation markers hsCRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were assessed in subjects from CHECK (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee) demonstrating Kellgren and Lawrence grade ≤1 OA on knee radiographs. Minimum JSW and OP area of these knees were quantified in detail using Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA). RESULTS: uCTX-II levels showed negative associations with minimum JSW and positive associations with OP area. sCOMP and sHA levels showed positive associations with OP area, but not with minimum JSW. uCTX-I and uNTX-I levels showed negative associations with minimum JSW and OP area. Associations of biochemical marker levels with minimum JSW were similar between painful and non-painful knees, associations of uCTX-II, sCOMP, and sHA with OP area were only observed in painful knees. CONCLUSIONS: In these subjects with no or doubtful radiographic knee OA, uCTX-II might not only reflect articular cartilage degradation but also endochondral ossification in osteophytes. Furthermore, sCOMP and sHA relate to osteophytes, maybe because synovitis drives osteophyte development. High bone turnover may aggravate articular cartilage loss. Metabolic activity in osteophytes and synovial tissue, but not in articular cartilage may be related to knee pain.

Influence of variation in semiflexed knee positioning during image acquisition on separate quantitative radiographic parameters of osteoarthritis, measured by Knee Images Digital Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical application of quantitative measurement of separate radiographic parameters of knee osteoarthritis (OA) might be hampered by a lack of reproducible semiflexed joint positioning during acquisition of radiographs. The influence of systematic variations in knee positioning on measurement of separate quantitative radiographic parameters was studied. METHODS: Five components of knee position during radiographic acquisition (beam height, lower and upper leg extension, internal rotation, and lateral shift) were systematically varied within a clinically relevant range, using three cadaver legs. The influence of these variations on the measurement of the separate quantitative radiographic parameters by Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA) was evaluated. Significant changes were validated in vivo. Changes were compared with differences during 2-year follow-up in a radiographic progression cohort of early OA. RESULTS: Systematic variation in upper and lower leg extension induced changes in the measurement of joint space width (JSW). Lower leg extension also influenced osteophyte area and eminence height measurement. Also bone density measurement was influenced by variation in all five position components. Variations were of clinical relevance compared with 2-year differences in knees with radiographic progression, and were confirmed in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in semiflexed knee positioning, which are considered to occur easily during image acquisition in trials and clinical practice despite standardization, are of significant influence on the quantitative measurement of most separate radiographic parameters of OA using KIDA. The additional value of quantitative measurement might improve significantly by better standardization during radiographic acquisition; with radiography still being the gold standard for structure-modification in OA.

Evaluation of separate quantitative radiographic features adds to the prediction of incident radiographic osteoarthritis in individuals with recent onset of knee pain: 5-year follow-up in the CHECK cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Detailed radiographic evaluation might enable the identification of osteoarthritis (OA) earlier in the disease. This study evaluated whether and which separate quantitative features on knee radiographs of individuals with recent onset knee pain are associated with incidence of radiographic OA and persistence and/or progression of clinical OA during 5-year follow-up. METHOD: From the Cohort Hip & Cohort Knee study participants with knee pain at baseline were evaluated. Radiographic OA development was defined as Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) grade ≥ II at 5-year follow-up. Clinical OA was defined as persistent knee pain and as progression of Westen Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) pain and function score during follow-up. At baseline radiographic damage was determined by quantitative measurement of separate features using Knee Images Digital Analysis, and by K&L-grading. RESULTS: Measuring osteophyte area [odds ratio (OR) =7.0] and minimum joint space width (OR=0.7), in addition to demographic and clinical characteristics, improved the prediction of radiographic OA 5 years later [area under curve receiver operating characteristic=0.74 vs 0.64 without radiographic features]. When the predictive score (based on multivariate regression coefficients) was larger than the cut-off for optimal specificity, the chance of incident radiographic OA was 54% instead of the prior probability of 19%. Evaluating separate quantitative features performed slightly better than K&L-grading (AUC=0.70). Radiographic characteristics hardly added to prediction of clinical OA. CONCLUSION: In individuals with onset knee pain, radiographic characteristics added to the prediction of radiographic OA development 5 years later. Quantitative radiographic evaluation in individuals with suspected OA is worthwhile when determining treatment strategies and designing clinical trials.

Radiographic features of knee and hip osteoarthritis represent characteristics of an individual, in addition to severity of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate to what extent radiographic features of knees and hips that are normally related to osteoarthritis (OA) represent characteristics of an individual in addition to OA severity. METHODS: We studied a cohort of individuals (n = 1002) with very early signs of hip and knee OA, from the Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee (CHECK) study. Baseline radiographs were evaluated by digital analyses, using Holy's and Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA) software, providing distinct quantitative measures of radiographic OA features. In addition, conventional Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grading was performed. Digital parameters were evaluated for correlations within participants between contralateral (left vs. right hip and left vs. right knee), ipsilateral (e.g. left hip vs. left knee), and diagonal joints (e.g. left hip vs. right knee). Analyses were performed separately for participants with KL grade 0-I and those with evident radiographic OA (KL grade II-III). Regression analyses determined whether demographic characteristics were related to radiographic features. RESULTS: Correlations between digital parameters and KL grade were moderate, and within each KL grade large variation was found. Within participants strong correlations were found for digital parameters between joints in individuals with KL grade 0-I (R = 0.60-0.89), strongest for contralateral comparison, but no statistically significant correlations were found for participants with KL grade II-III. The demographic characteristics age, gender, height, and weight were, to a limited extent (R(2) = 0.01-0.20) but statistically significant, related to radiographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: Using digital analyses of radiographic OA, strong correlations between joints within participants were found. These correlations diminished when OA became evident. This has implications for monitoring joint damage in (very) early OA with digital analyses.

Feasibility of bone density evaluation using plain digital radiography.

OBJECTIVE: For the radiographic evaluation of subchondral bone changes (sclerosis) in osteoarthritis (OA), bone density (BD) is commonly subjectively assessed. BD evaluation using plain digital radiography might be influenced by acquisition and post-processing (PP) settings. Objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of these settings on the measurement of BD using digital radiographs. METHODS: A bone density standard (BDS) of hydroxyapatite (HA) mimicked a BD range of 1.0-5.75 g/cm(2). Digital radiographs were acquired with variation in acquisition settings, and with clinical and minimal PP. An aluminum step wedge served as an internal reference to express the gray values of the BDS in mm aluminum equivalents (mmAl). The relation (R(2)) between actual BD and BD normalized to the reference wedge was evaluated with linear regression analyses for radiographs with variations in PP and acquisition settings. Precision of BD measurement of the BDS was evaluated for application in clinical practice. RESULTS: The correlation between actual BD and BD normalized to the reference was improved by changing PP from clinical (R(2)=0.96) to minimal (R(2)=0.98). Higher tube voltage [kilovolt (kV)] improved the correlation further. Even for clinical PP, average standard deviation (SD) was 0.97 mmAl, much smaller than the change of 2.51 mmAl clinically observed in early OA, which implies the feasibility of BD measurements on digital radiographs. CONCLUSION: Changing PP and acquisition settings in clinical practice can have profound effect on outcome. If done with care, accurate BD measurement is feasible using plain digital radiography.

A systematic review of the association between radiographic and clinical osteoarthritis of hip and knee.

OBJECTIVE: There is ongoing debate on whether an association between radiographic and clinical osteoarthritis (OA) exists. We hypothesized that the inconsistency in the detection of an association might be caused by different definitions of OA, by different radiographic protocols, and by scoring methods for radiographic damage and symptoms. The goal of this study was to evaluate which methodological criteria are important to detect an association between radiographic and clinical OA of hip and knee. METHODS: A literature search was performed with the keywords 'OA', 'hip', 'knee', 'radiographic', and 'clinical' and results were screened for relevant studies. Quality criteria for study characteristics and methodology were developed. Studies were classified according to these criteria and the presence of an association between radiographic and clinical OA was scored. The importance of methodological quality and patient characteristics on the presence of an association was evaluated. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 39 studies describing an association between radiographic and clinical OA. The frequency of an association between radiographic and clinical OA outcome measures diminished when less quality criteria were fulfilled. Specifically the criterion for standardized outcome measures appeared important in the detection of an association. The association was not influenced by patient characteristics. Only four studies were identified that fulfilled all quality criteria and in these studies an association was found for the knee joint and an inconsistent association was found for the hip joint. CONCLUSION: Methodological quality criteria are of importance to reveal an association between radiographic and clinical OA.