Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Soc Integr Oncol ; 4(1): 16-20, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16737668

ABSTRACT

The present study examines the efficacy of acupressure wristbands, compared with standard care alone and acustimulation wristbands, in preventing severe nausea among 86 breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin-based chemotherapy who were at high risk of experiencing severe nausea following treatment. Significant differences in the proportion of patients who reported severe nausea were observed across three conditions (standard care, standard care with acupressure bands, and standard care with an acustimulation band). The proportion of patients in the acupressure band group who reported severe nausea following their chemotherapy treatment (41%) was significantly less than that of the standard care group (68%) and the acustimulation band group (73%). Overall, these findings showed that acupressure wristbands were efficacious and may be an appropriate form of adjuvant therapy for nausea management for breast cancer patients, especially those who are most at risk for experiencing severe nausea following chemotherapy treatment.


Subject(s)
Acupressure , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Nausea/therapy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/therapy , Wrist
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 21(24): 4635-41, 2003 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14673053

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Fatigue and depression typically occur together in cancer patients, suggesting a common etiology, perhaps based on serotonin. This randomized clinical trial tested whether paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant known to modulate brain serotonin, would reduce fatigue in cancer patients and whether any reduction was related to depression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy for the first time were assessed for fatigue. Of 704 patients who reported fatigue at their second chemotherapy cycle, 549 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 20 mg of oral paroxetine hydrochloride daily or placebo for 8 weeks. The assessments of fatigue and depression were performed at cycles 3 and 4 of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients treated with paroxetine and 235 patients treated with placebo provided assessable data. No difference was detected in fatigue between patient groups. At the end of the study, there was a difference between groups in the mean level of depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scores, 12.0 v 14.8, respectively; P <.01). CONCLUSION: Paroxetine had no influence on fatigue in patients receiving chemotherapy. A possible explanation is that cancer-related fatigue does not involve a reduction in brain 5-HT levels.


Subject(s)
Depression/prevention & control , Fatigue/prevention & control , Neoplasms/complications , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Chi-Square Distribution , Depression/etiology , Double-Blind Method , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
3.
Cancer ; 97(11): 2880-6, 2003 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12767103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinical reports suggest that nausea remains a side effect of chemotherapy despite widespread use of serotonin receptor antagonists. This study summarized the frequency, timing, and intensity of postchemotherapy nausea for patients receiving doxorubicin, cisplatin, or carboplatin. METHODS: Three hundred sixty chemotherapy-naïve patients (73% female) were enrolled in a study testing the ability of an information intervention to reduce nausea. Of these, 322 subjects completed the Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis (MANE), as well as a 5-day self-report diary, at Cycle 1 (300 subjects completed the MANE and self-report diary at Cycle 2). All patients received a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (ondansetron) with dexamethasone on the day of treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the patients developed nausea during the 5-day period, beginning with the Cycle 1 infusion, and 73% of patients reported delayed nausea (DN) during Days 2-5. The proportions were similar during Cycle 2. Fifty-five percent of patients described their DN as being of moderate or greater intensity compared with 28% of patients who described acute nausea. Carboplatin was less likely to cause DN than either of the other agents (56% of 106 patients compared with 75% of 47 receiving cisplatin and 83% of 169 taking doxorubicin). The mean peak DN severity was 4.34 (range, 1-7) for doxorubicin, which was significantly higher than the mean peak value for carboplatin (3.66) but was not significantly different from the mean peak value for cisplatin (4.26). Eighteen percent of patients did not experience nausea until Day 3 or later. CONCLUSIONS: Despite prophylaxis with ondansetron, the majority of patients receiving one of these common chemotherapy agents experienced nausea. The frequency of DN was nearly twice that of acute nausea. Results show the need for continued development of antiemetics that are effective against DN.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/prevention & control , Serotonin/therapeutic use , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Serotonin/drug effects , Receptors, Serotonin, 5-HT3
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...