The effect of excision of the radial head and metallic radial head replacement on the tension in the interosseous membrane.

We measured the tension in the interosseous membrane in six cadaveric forearms using an in vitro forearm testing system with the native radial head, after excision of the radial head and after metallic radial head replacement. The tension almost doubled after excision of the radial head during simulated rotation of the forearm (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in tension in the interosseous membrane between the native and radial head replacement states (p = 0.09). Maximal tension occurred in neutral rotation with both the native and the replaced radial head, but in pronation if the radial head was excised. Under an increasing axial load and with the forearm in a fixed position, the rate of increase in tension in the interosseous membrane was greater when the radial head was excised than for the native radial head or replacement states (p = 0.02). As there was no difference in tension between the native and radial head replacement states, a radial head replacement should provide a normal healing environment for the interosseous membrane after injury or following its reconstruction. Load sharing between the radius and ulna becomes normal after radial head Replacement. As excision of the radial head significantly increased the tension in the interosseous membrane it may potentially lead to its attritional failure over time.

Utility of an image-based technique to detect changes in joint congruency following simulated joint injury and repair: an in vitro study of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Investigating joint mechanics is important when determining the etiology of osteoarthritis, as degenerative changes are thought to occur due to altered joint mechanics. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of an x-ray computed tomography-based approach to evaluate joint congruency in the setting of subtle kinematic alterations, employing an in vitro model of collateral ligament repair of the elbow. METHODS: Active and passive elbow flexion was performed in 4 and 5 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities respectively using an elbow motion simulator in the valgus gravity dependent positions. The collateral ligaments were sectioned and repaired. A registration and inter-bone distance algorithm were then used to examine ulnohumeral joint congruency (quantified as surface area) throughout elbow flexion. Valgus angulation was also measured. FINDINGS: Following ligament sectioning and repair, there was a 1.2±1.0° increase in valgus angulation in active flexion and a 21.2±26.2% decrease in surface area. In passive flexion, valgus angulation increased 3.3±2.2° and surface area decreased 57.9±39.9%. INTERPRETATION: The technique described to quantify joint congruency proved to be sensitive enough to detect large changes in joint surface interactions inspite of only small changes in traditionally measured kinematics. These changes in joint congruency may, in part, explain the high incidence of arthritis that has been reported following ligament injuries of the elbow, even in the absence of clinically detectable instability. This technique, when adapted for in vivo use, will be a useful tool to evaluate joint function and the effectiveness of treatments non-invasively.

Elbow kinematics after radiocapitellar arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty has been proposed as a reconstructive option for combined radial head and capitellar deficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiocapitellar replacement on elbow kinematics. We hypothesized that with the medial collateral ligament (MCL) intact, radiocapitellar arthroplasty would replicate normal kinematics, and that a radiocapitellar arthroplasty would more closely approximate normal kinematics than an elbow with a deficient lateral column or with a deficient MCL. METHODS: We tested 7 cadaveric arms in an upper extremity joint simulator. Each arm underwent computed tomographic scanning to aid implant size selection and computer-assisted implant insertion. We obtained kinematic data using an electromagnetic tracking system during elbow flexion. The capitellar and radial head implants were placed through an extended lateral epicondylar osteotomy. We sectioned the anterior bundle of the MCL, leaving the flexor-pronator mass intact. Outcomes of interest were varus-valgus and rotational kinematics of the ulnohumeral joint. RESULTS: The radiocapitellar arthroplasty showed no difference in kinematics compared with the postosteotomy control. The MCL-deficient elbow showed more valgus angulation and more external ulnar rotation than the control or radiocapitellar arthroplasty in the pronated, valgus loaded position. The deficient lateral column demonstrated increased external ulnar rotation kinematics during active elbow flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty can restore normal elbow kinematics with the MCL intact. If the MCL is deficient, radiocapitellar arthroplasty does not restore normal kinematics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty should be considered in cases of lateral column deficiency because it maintains normal elbow kinematics during active motion. Whereas radiocapitellar arthroplasty improves the stability of the MCL-deficient elbow with deficiency of the lateral column, reconstruction of the MCL may further improve normal kinematics.

Fragility fractures of the distal humerus: What is the optimal treatment?

In light of the growing number of elderly osteopenic patients with distal humeral fractures, we discuss the history of their management and current trends. Under most circumstances operative fixation and early mobilisation is the treatment of choice, as it gives the best results. The relative indications for and results of total elbow replacement versus internal fixation are discussed.

The impact of capitellar arthroplasty on elbow contact mechanics: Implications for implant design.

BACKGROUND: Radiocapitellar arthroplasty is indicated for capitellar deficiency. Although current implants employ a spherical capitellar surface, the capitellum is elliptical. This has implications for congruency and wear in capitellar arthroplasty. Our objective was to evaluate the contact mechanics of radiocapitellar arthroplasty. We hypothesized that capitellar replacement would decrease joint contact area relative to the native articulation; and an anatomical implant design would replicate more normal contact morphology than a spherical implant. METHODS: Eight paired humeri and radii were potted in a custom jig. A compressive load of 85N was applied with the articulation flexed at 45° in neutral forearm rotation. Joint casts were made and the articular contact area and shape were quantified. Anatomical and spherical capitellar implants were tested against the native radial head (hemiarthroplasty). FINDINGS: The contact areas for the anatomical and spherical hemiarthroplasties were 59 and 51% of the native articulation (P<0.005), while the unicompartmental arthroplasties' contact areas were 84 and 89% (anatomical, spherical) of the native articulation (P<0.01). No implant was superior in recreating the native contact shape. INTERPRETATION: Placement of any capitellar implant resulted in a large decrease in contact area when articulating with a native radial head. This suggests that the radial head cartilage would see a marked increase in contact pressure relative to the native articulation. The unicompartmental arthroplasties demonstrated an even larger reduction in contact area, raising concern about accelerated surface wear. Further investigation needs to correlate these contact mechanics to cartilage wear and implant longevity.

Osteotomy of the head of the radius for partial articular malunion.

Between 1995 and 2006, five intra-articular osteotomies of the head of the radius were performed in patients with symptomatic healed displaced articular fractures. Pre-operatively, all patients complained of persistent painful clicking on movement. Only patients with mild or no degenerative changes of the radial head and capitellum were considered for osteotomy. The operations were performed at a mean of 8.2 months (4 to 13) after injury and the patients were reviewed at a mean of 5.5 years (15 months to 12 years) after the osteotomy. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Index Score improved significantly from 74 before to 88 after operation, with four patients rated as good or excellent (p < 0.05). The subjective patient satisfaction score was 8.4 on a ten-point scale. All osteotomies healed and there were no complications. In this small series intra-articular osteotomy of the head of the radius was a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic intra-articular malunion without advanced degenerative changes.

The effect of surface area digitizations on the prediction of spherical anatomical geometries for computer-assisted applications.

Intraoperative digitization of osseous structures is an integral component of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery. This study determined the repeatability and accuracy of predicting known radii and center locations of spherical objects for different proportions of digitized surface areas and various sphere sizes. Also, we investigated these accuracies for some relevant near-spherical osseous structures where results from full area digitizations were considered to be true. Digitizations were performed using an electromagnetic tracker with a stylus on the total and fractional surfaces of 10 hemispheres, ranging from 10 to 28mm in radius. Repeatability was quantified by digitizing five trials of the entire surface and various fractional areas of selected hemisphere sizes. Similar trials were conducted on models of a humeral and femoral head, using the full head area as baseline and digitizing 15 and 30mm diameter areas of the full head. Mean error for the predicted radii and center positions of the hemispheres ranged from 0.39+/-0.29 to 0.14+/-0.07mm and 0.52+/-0.31 to 0.22+/-0.12mm, respectively. Repeatability for the predicted radii and centers produced maximum standard deviations of 0.31 and 0.42mm, respectively. All errors decreased as fractional area (40%, 60%, 80% and 100%) increased (p<0.05). Radius of curvature and center position errors for the humeral head model were 1.51+/-2.11 and 2.28+/-1.51mm, respectively. These errors for the femoral head model were 3.37+/-4.14 and 4.25+/-4.14mm, respectively. Errors resulting from the prediction of radius and center indicate that non-spherical anatomical structures are more sensitive to the digitized area, and hence digitization of the largest surface possible seems warranted.

The effect of medial collateral ligament repair tension on elbow joint kinematics and stability.

PURPOSE: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is commonly performed for the management of acute or subacute instability after elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations. The effectiveness of transosseous repair of the MCL, as is typically performed clinically, in restoring the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow is of interest as is the effect of MCL tensioning on the initial stability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether suture repair of the MCL is able to restore the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow and to determine the optimal initial MCL repair tension. METHODS: Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an upper limb joint simulator. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion was generated while the kinematics were measured with the arm in the dependent and the valgus gravity-loaded orientations. After testing the intact elbow, the MCL was released at its humeral attachment and repaired using a transosseous suture technique at three different repair tensions: 20, 40, and 60 N. RESULTS: Medial collateral ligament repair using a transosseous suture technique restored the kinematics and stability of the MCL-deficient elbow. Motion pathways were affected by the magnitude of initial MCL tension. For all arm orientations and forearm positions, the 20-N and 40-N repairs were not statistically different from each other or from the intact MCL. The 60-N repairs, however, were often statistically different than the other groups, suggesting an overtightening that tended to pull the ulna into a varus position-especially in the midrange of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MCL repair using transosseous sutures provide adequate joint stability to permit early motion. There is a broad range of acceptable tensions for MCL repair, which is a favorable, clinically relevant finding. Clinical studies are needed to validate these in vitro results.

The detection of loose bodies in the elbow: the value of MRI and CT arthrography.

Our aim was to determine the clinical value of MRI and CT arthrography in predicting the presence of loose bodies in the elbow. A series of 26 patients with mechanical symptoms in the elbow had plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography, followed by routine arthroscopy of the elbow. The location and number of loose bodies determined by MRI and CT arthrography were recorded. Pre-operative plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography were compared with arthroscopy. Both MRI and CT arthrography had excellent sensitivity (92% to 100%) but low to moderate specificity (15% to 77%) in identifying posteriorly-based loose bodies. Neither MRI nor CT arthrography was consistently sensitive (46% to 91%) or specific (13% to 73%) in predicting the presence or absence of loose bodies anteriorly. The overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies in either compartment was 88% to 100% and the specificity 20% to 70%. Pre-operative radiography had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71%, respectively. Our results suggest that neither CT arthrography nor MRI is reliable or accurate enough to be any more effective than plain radiography alone in patients presenting with mechanical symptoms in the elbow.

Tensile strength of healing peripheral nerves.

Although the time required for a nerve to gain sufficient strength to withstand normal physiologic forces of joint motion is unknown, typically nerve repairs are protected up to 3 weeks postoperatively. The authors investigated the mechanical strength of a nerve repair as a function of time. Fifty adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent sciatic nerve division and repair, and were sacrificed in groups of 10 at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Repaired nerves were then mechanically loaded at 5 mm/min to failure. Gapping across the repair site was captured on high-resolution video. The contralateral sciatic nerve served as a control. A significant increase in tensile strength was gained between 0 and 1 week and between 2 and 4 weeks. Healing nerves achieved 63 percent of the strength of the control by 8 weeks. Controls showed no gain in strength over the testing period. Gapping occurred at lower forces at all time increments. From 0 to 1 week, a significant increase in load necessary to produce gapping was found, which did not increase significantly again until 8 weeks. These results may have implications for postoperative rehabilitation protocols in patients with nerve injuries.

Kinematics of ulnar head arthroplasty.

This in vitro study evaluated the performance of an ulnar head replacement. A joint simulator was employed that produced active forearm rotation in cadaveric specimens, with motion measured using an electromagnetic tracking system. The kinematics of the intact forearm were compared with a partial ulnar head replacement and a full replacement (with and without soft-tissue reconstruction) and a full excision of the ulnar head. There were no differences between intact kinematics and those following prosthetic reconstruction. However, ulnar head excision produced distal radioulnar joint instability in the form of radioulnar convergence and increased anteroposterior translations.