Role of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Approximately 50% of patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma harbor a somatic BRAF mutation. BRAF inhibitors are now established in the treatment paradigm of BRAF mutant melanoma, following the approval of vemurafenib by the US FDA in 2011. The vast majority of patients obtain some degree of tumor shrinkage with oral BRAF inhibitors, and responses are often rapid. However, resistance inevitably develops, with a median progression-free survival of 5-7 months. The oral MEK inhibitor trametinib has also shown activity in BRAF mutant melanoma in Phase III trials. We review the rationale for treating BRAF mutant melanoma with trametinib, as single-agent therapy and in combination with BRAF inhibitors, as well as the clinical data to date.

Axitinib for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men and comprises 23% of total cancer deaths worldwide. The majority of patients present with advanced disease, for whom the 5-year survival is < 5%. Since angiogenesis plays a central role in tumourigenesis, inhibiting this pathway may improve outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Axitinib is one of the latest and most potent anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) currently being evaluated to treat NSCLC. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the rationale for targeting angiogenesis in lung cancer, other angiogenic agents in NSCLC, axitinib's mechanism of action, pharmacology and metabolism, and the preclinical and clinical data to date in NSCLC will be discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Several TKI which target angiogenesis pathways have resulted in improved response rates and progression-free survival in NSCLC, but no improvement in overall survival in clinical trials. Axitinib is a more potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors than other TKI, but this has yet to translate into a clinical benefit. Phase II trials are ongoing, but the published data to date has yet to support a role for axitinib in the treatment algorithm for NSCLC.

Fertility preservation in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer in the UK: a questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVE: Fertility preservation is an important survivorship issue for women treated for breast cancer. The aim of this work was to examine the referral practices of health care professionals who treat women with breast cancer in the United Kingdom, and to investigate their understanding and knowledge of the fertility preservation options available. METHOD: An invitation to participate in a confidential, online questionnaire was e-mailed to surgeons, oncologists, and clinical nurse specialists who manage patients with breast cancer in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: n = 306 respondents. Factors which influenced whether fertility preservation options were discussed with a patient included the following: patient's age (78%), final tumor/nodes/metastasis status (37.9%); concern that fertility preservation would delay chemotherapy (37.3%); whether the patient had children (33.5%) or a partner (24.7%); estrogen receptor expression (22.6%), lack of knowledge regarding the available options (20.9%); and concern that fertility preservation would compromise the success of cancer treatment (19.8%). Twenty-seven percent did not know whether fertility preservation was available for their patients on the National Health Service. Nearly half (49.4%) of respondents said that gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists were used for fertility preservation outside the setting of a clinical trial. Knowledge regarding the available options varied according to different members of the multidisciplinary team, with consultant oncologists better informed than consultant surgeons or clinical nurse specialists (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Many health care professionals have incomplete knowledge regarding the local arrangements for fertility preservation for patients with breast cancer. This may result in patients receiving inadequate or conflicting information regarding fertility preservation.

IL15 can reverse the unresponsiveness of Wilms' tumor antigen-specific CTL in patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The Wilms' tumor antigen 1 (WT1) is overexpressed in several leukemias and solid tumors, but there is currently limited information regarding its role in prostate cancer. This study aimed to investigate WT1 expression in prostate cancer, and to determine the number and function of WT1-specific T cells in the peripheral blood of patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Immunohistochemistry was used to assess WT1 expression in cancer tissues. Human leukocyte antigen A2 (HLA-A2) tetramers served to detect WT1-specific T cells, and peptide-specific stimulation was used to assess T-cell function in vitro. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry of tissue arrays comprising 36 cancer and 8 normal prostate samples revealed nuclear WT1 staining in 39% of cancer samples, but not in normal prostate tissues. Tetramer analysis revealed a low frequency of WT1-specific T cells in 20 of 38 HLA-A2-positive patients. In vitro stimulation with WT1 peptide plus interleukin 2(IL2) and interleukin 7 (IL7) did not lead to an accumulation of WT1-specific T cells in any of the patient samples, although all patients were able to generate T-cell responses against Melan-A/MART1 control peptide. Stimulation with WT1 peptide in the presence of interleukin 15 (IL15), a cytokine that was shown to reverse tolerance of murine tumor-specific T cells, was able to restore the expansion and IFNgamma production of WT1-specific T cells in a subgroup of prostate cancer patients. CONCLUSION: The observation that IL15 can restore the function of WT1-specific T cells that were unresponsive to IL2 has implications for vaccination and immunotherapeutic strategies that aim to enhance WT1-specific T cell immunity in patients.