What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants.

OBJECTIVE: The World Maternal Antifibrinolytic (WOMAN) Trial was the first in the UK to use the option of waiver of informed consent at the time of an obstetric emergency. This qualitative study aimed to investigate participants' views of the acceptability of the recruitment methods used. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews with women who did and did not give consent at the time of their recruitment to the WOMAN Trial. SETTING: Highest UK recruitment site for the WOMAN Trial (129/569). Interviews were conducted in participants' homes. POPULATION: About 40 of the 129 women who were recruited to the WOMAN Trial at one UK site were invited to take part, 15 women were interviewed. METHODS: Qualitative, interview study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Facilitators and barriers to successful recruitment during obstetric emergencies. Guidance for future researchers. RESULTS: Findings revealed that what is important is not so much the consent process used or a signature on a form, but the way in which consent is obtained. Clinicians who successfully negotiate consent to research during childbirth emergencies engage in a 'humane choreography' of words and actions. This emphasises the importance of prompt decision-making and treatment, while respecting the woman's personal situation and experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support a single pathway to consent in the context of an obstetric emergency. Women understand that consent to research in an emergency is complex. Clinicians' skills in considering the clinical, ethical, and emotional aspects within the context of the clinical emergency can hamper or promote women's satisfaction. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Study reports on women's views of consent to research in an obstetric emergency. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Why and how was the study carried out? We undertook this study to find out what women thought about being included in a research study called the WOMAN Trial at the time they were being treated for heavy bleeding after giving birth. Some women had been asked if they wanted to be a part of the research at the time they were bleeding. Others were asked later, after they had recovered. We conducted interviews with 15 women who had been involved and asked what they thought about the way they had been asked, their preferences and ideas for improvements in future similar studies What were the main findings? Women understood how difficult it was for their doctors and midwives to ask them about the research study. They were pleased to have been included in the research and were mostly happy with the way they gave consent. Women's views were similar whether they were asked about the research at the time of the bleeding or after they had recovered. The most important thing was that doctors and midwives carefully thought about the situation the woman found herself in and how this might make her feel, so they could tailor their approach accordingly. What are the limitations of the work? This study only involved women from one hospital. The WOMAN Trial included women from many areas of the UK and other countries around the world. We do not know how their experiences or views may differ. What is the implication for professionals? Careful use of actions and words by birth attendants was the difference between a good or bad experience for the woman and her family. This is an important skill that could be developed as part of professional training.

Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIg) therapy--practical considerations.

There is an increasing range of therapeutic options for primary antibody-deficient patients who require replacement immunoglobulin. These include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg), rapid push SCIg and most recently recombinant human hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIg (fSCIg). Advantages of fSCIg include fewer needle punctures, longer infusion intervals and an improved adverse effect profile relative to IVIg. Limited real-life experience exists concerning the practical aspects of switching or starting patients on fSCIg. We describe the first 14 patients who have been treated with fSCIg at the Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales (ICW), representing more than 6 patient-years of experience. The regimen was well tolerated, with high levels of satisfaction and no increase in training requirement, including for a treatment-naive patient. Two patients discontinued fSCIg due to pain and swelling at the infusion site, and one paused therapy following post-infusion migraines. Ultrasound imaging of paired conventional and facilitated SCIg demonstrated clear differences in subcutaneous space distribution associated with a 10-fold increase in rate and volume delivery with fSCIg. Patient profiles for those choosing fSCIg fell into two main categories: those experiencing clinical problems with their current treatment and those seeking greater convenience and flexibility. When introducing fSCIg, consideration of the type and programming of infusion pump, needle gauge and length, infusion site, up-dosing schedule, home training and patient information are important, as these may differ from conventional SCIg. This paper provides guidance on practical aspects of the administration, training and outcomes to help inform decision-making for this new treatment modality.

Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether women view decision-making surrounding vaginal or caesarean birth as their choice. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study utilising quantitative (questionnaire, routinely collected data) and qualitative (in-depth interviews) methods simultaneously. SETTING: A large hospital providing National Health Service maternity care in the UK. SAMPLE: Four-hundred and fifty-four primigravid women. METHODS: Women completed up to three questionnaires between their antenatal booking appointment and delivery. Amongst these women, 153 were interviewed at least once during pregnancy (between 24 and 36 weeks) and/or after 12 moths after birth. Data were also obtained from women's hospital delivery records. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed (survey and delivery data). Interview data were analysed using a seven-stage sequential form of qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Whilst many women supported the principle of choice, they identified how, in practice their autonomy was limited by individual circumstance and available care provision. All women felt that concerns about their baby's or their own health should take precedence over personal preference. Moreover, expressing a preference for either vaginal or caesarean birth was inherently problematic as choice until the time of delivery was neither static nor final. Women did not have autonomous choice over their actual birth method, but neither did they necessarily want it. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large exploratory study suggest that choice may not be the best concept through which to approach the current arrangements for birth in the UK. Moreover, they challenge the notion of choice that currently prevails in international debates about caesarean delivery for maternal request.

Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are progressively rising in many parts of the world. One suggested reason is increasing requests by women for caesarean section in the absence of clear medical indications, such as placenta praevia, HIV infection, contracted pelvis and, arguably, breech presentation or previous caesarean section. The reported benefits of planned caesarean section include greater safety for the baby, less pelvic floor trauma for the mother, avoidance of labour pain and convenience. The potential disadvantages, from observational studies, include increased risk of major morbidity or mortality for the mother, adverse psychological sequelae, and problems in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine scar rupture and greater risk of stillbirth and neonatal morbidity. An unbiased assessment of advantages and disadvantages would assist discussion of what has become a contentious issue in modern obstetrics. OBJECTIVES: To assess, from randomised trials, the effects on perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, and on maternal psychological morbidity, of planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal birth in women with no clear clinical indication for caesarean section. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (December 2005), MEDLINE (1974 to April 2005), EMBASE (1974 to April 2005), CINAHL (1982 to April 2005) and PsycINFO (1887 to April 2005). We also performed a manual search of the references of all retrieved articles, sought unpublished papers and abstracts submitted to international conferences and contacted expert informants. SELECTION CRITERIA: All comparisons of intention to perform caesarean section and intention for women to give birth vaginally; random allocation to treatment and control groups; adequate allocation concealment; women at term with single fetuses with cephalic presentations and no clear medical indication for caesarean section. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria. MAIN RESULTS: There were no included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence from randomised controlled trials, upon which to base any practice recommendations regarding planned caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. In the absence of trial data, there is an urgent need for a systematic review of observational studies and a synthesis of qualitative data to better assess the short- and long-term effects of caesarean section and vaginal birth.

Measurement of carbon dioxide production in very low birth weight babies.

BACKGROUND: CO2 production is most commonly measured by using indirect calorimetry to quantify elimination of CO(2) in breath (VCO2). An alternative is to measure the rate at which CO2 appears in the body pool (RaCO2) by infusing a (13)C labelled bicarbonate tracer. VCO2 and RaCO2 generally differ but are related by c, a factor that adjusts for the incomplete recovery of infused tracer in the breath. The literature relating to human studies cites a wide range of values for c but the only neonatal study to determine c empirically estimated a mean value of 0.77. AIM: To estimate fractional recovery rate, c, in very low birthweight babies, and assess the feasibility of using the isotopic technique to measure CO2 production during mechanical ventilation. METHOD: Eleven spontaneously breathing, continuously fed, very low birthweight infants (median birth weight 1060 g, median gestational age 29 weeks) were studied. RESULTS: Mean (SD) VCO2 was 9.0 (2.0) ml/min (standard temperature and pressure dry, STPD) and mean (SD) RaCO2 was 9.6 (2.1) ml/min (STPD). The mean (SD) value of c was estimated as 0.95 (0.13). The 95% confidence intervals of the mean were 0.87-1.03. CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasise the importance of measuring c for a given study population rather than assuming a value based on adult studies. The close approximation of RaCO2 and VCO2 in this group of babies implies that the labelled bicarbonate infusion technique could be used to measure simply CO2 production during mechanical ventilation.

Pituitary apoplexy secondary to an underlying abscess.

An unusual case of pituitary apoplexy in a patient with pituitary abscess is described. The patient was found to have underlying chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and an associated hypogammaglobinaemia is postulated as being the predisposing cause for infection.

Case report: CT scan appearances of a pituitary abscess.

Isolated abscess of the pituitary gland is rare. The computed tomography (CT) appearances of a pituitary abscess have not been well documented. We describe an unusual case of a pituitary abscess and discuss the CT scan appearances.

Rapid, competitive enzymoimmunoassay for albumin in urine.

In this solid-phase competitive enzymoimmunoassay for albumin in human urine, antiserum to human serum albumin labeled with horseradish peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7) is incubated with solid-phase-bound human serum albumin in the presence of sample or standard. Results obtained correlate well (r = 0.96) with those of an established fluoroimmunoassay. The present assay covers the range 0.9 to 200 mg/L and can be performed within 1 h. These characteristics, together with the simplicity of the assay protocol, make it very useful for monitoring low concentrations of albumin in urine. Detection of such minimal albuminuria allows initiation of therapy that may prevent development of clinical proteinuria and associated diabetic nephropathy.