Cohort profile: longitudinal and population comparison of children who are HIV-exposed uninfected and children who are HIV unexposed in Kenya (HOPE study).

PURPOSE: Globally, the number of children/adolescents exposed to HIV but uninfected (HIV-exposed uninfected, HEU) is growing. The HEU outcomes: population-evaluation and screening strategies study was designed to provide population-level evidence of the impact of HIV and recent antiretroviral therapy regimen exposure on neurodevelopmental, hearing and mental health outcomes from infancy to adolescence. PARTICIPANTS: The study includes a prospective mother-infant cohort and cross-sectional child/youth-caregiver cohorts conducted in Kenya.Between 2021 and 2022, the study enrolled 2000 mother-infant pairs (1000 HEU and 1000 HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU)) for longitudinal follow-up. Infants were eligible if they were aged 4-10 weeks and healthy. Mothers were eligible if their HIV status was known and were ≥18 years. Study visits are 6 monthly until the child reaches age 3 years.Cross-sectional cohorts spanning ages 3-18 years started enrolment in 2022. Target enrolment is 4400 children/youth (4000 HEU and 400 HUU). Children and youth are eligible if they are HIV negative, maternal HIV status and timing of diagnosis is known, and caregivers are ≥18 years.Data on infant/child/youth growth, neurodevelopment, mental health, morbidity and hearing are collected at enrolment using standardised tools. Dry blood spots samples are collected for telomere length assessment at baseline and yearly for the longitudinal cohort. Growth z-scores, neurodevelopmental scores, telomere length and prevalence of developmental and hearing problems will be compared between HEU/HUU populations. FINDINGS TO DATE: Full cohort enrolment for the longitudinal cohort is complete and participants are in follow-up. At 1 year of age, comparing HEU to HUU neurodevelopment using the Malawi developmental assessment tool, we found that HEU infants had higher language scores and comparable scores in fine motor, gross motor and social scores. The cross-sectional cohort has enrolled over 2000 participants and recruitment is ongoing. FUTURE PLANS: Longitudinal cohort follow-up and enrolment to the cross-sectional study will be completed in June 2024.

Hearing Loss Detection and Early Intervention Strategies in Kenya.

Background: Thirty-four million children globally have disabling hearing loss, with the highest prevalence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Early identification and management is crucial, yet barriers to screening and treatment of hearing loss are extensive in LMICs. Unaddressed hearing loss negatively impacts individuals and communities. The WHO's 2021 World Report on Hearing urges the development of Ear and Hearing Care (EHC) programs to improve access to all aspects of care, including screening, diagnostics, management, and developmental support. A joint Nairobi- and Seattle-based group convened in 2021 to discuss strategies for program development in Kenya, as presented in this paper. Findings: Developing a national EHC program must include the necessary support services for a child with a diagnosed hearing loss, while simultaneously promoting engagement of family, community, and healthcare workers. Existing government and healthcare system policies and priorities can be leveraged for EHC programming. Strategies for success include strengthening connections between policymakers at national, county, and municipal levels and local champions for the EHC agenda, with a concurrent focus on policy, early detection and intervention, habilitation, and family-centered care. Updates to health policy and funding to support the accessibility of services and equipment should focus on leveraging national healthcare coverage for hearing technologies and services, strengthening referral pathways, training to bolster the workforce, and metrics for monitoring and evaluation. Additional strategies to support forward progress include strategic engagement of partners and leveraging local partners for phased scale-up. Conclusions and Recommendations: Recommendations to strengthen EHC within the Kenyan health system include concurrent leverage of existing health policies and priorities, partner engagement, and strengthening referral pathways, monitoring and evaluation, and training. These strategies may be generalized to other countries too.

Neurodevelopment of children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected in Kenya.

INTRODUCTION: Predictors of neurodevelopment among children who are HIV-exposed uninfected (CHEU) are poorly understood. METHODS: Mothers with and without HIV and their children were enrolled during 6-week postnatal care visits across seven sites in Kenya between March 2021 and June 2022. Infant neurodevelopment was assessed using the Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool, including social, language, fine motor and gross motor domains. We used multivariate linear mixed effects models to identify associations between 1-year neurodevelopment scores, HIV and antiretroviral therapy (ART) exposures, and household factors, adjusted for potential confounders and clustered by the site. RESULTS: At 1-year evaluation, CHEU (n = 709) and children who are HIV-unexposed uninfected (CHUU) (n = 715) had comparable median age (52 weeks) and sex distribution (49% vs. 52% female). Mothers living with HIV were older (31 vs. 27 years), had lower education (50% vs. 26% primary) and were more likely to be report moderate-to-severe food insecurity (26% vs. 9%) (p < 0.01 for all). Compared to CHUU, CHEU had higher language scores (adjusted coeff: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.39) and comparable social, fine and gross motor scores. Among all children, preterm birth was associated with lower gross motor scores (adjusted coeff: -1.38, 95% CI: -2.05, -0.71), food insecurity was associated with lower social scores (adjusted coeff: -0.37, 95% CI: -0.73, -0.01) and maternal report of intimate partner violence (IPV) was associated with lower fine motor (adjusted coeff: -0.76, 95% CI: -1.40, -0.13) and gross motor scores (adjusted coeff: -1.07, 95% CI: -1.81, -0.33). Among CHEU, in utero efavirenz (EFV) exposure during pregnancy was associated with lower gross motor scores compared to dolutegravir (DTG) exposure (adjusted coeff: -0.51, 95% CI: -1.01, -0.03). Lower fine and gross motor scores were also associated with having a single or widowed mother (adjusted coeff: -0.45, 95% CI: -0.87, -0.03) or a deceased or absent father (adjusted coeff: -0.81, 95% CI: -1.58, -0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Biologic and social factors were associated with child neurodevelopment. Despite socio-demographic differences between CHEU and CHUU, 1-year neurodevelopment was similar. Addressing IPV and food insecurity may provide benefits regardless of maternal HIV status. DTG use was associated with higher neurodevelopmental scores in CHEU, compared to EFV regimens, potentially contributing to a lack of neurodevelopmental difference between CHEU and CHUU.

Epilepsy and driving: considerations on how eligibility should be decided.

Although few neurologists are formally trained in traffic medicine, they are frequently asked to assess whether a patient is medically fit to drive. For patients with epilepsy, the physician must assess the risk of the patient having a seizure while driving, and decide what is an acceptable risk. The legislation on this subject is aiming at finding a reasonable balance between two important considerations: public safety and a patient's individual need to drive. For the neurologist to explain and put into practice the legislation may be a demanding task and a challenge to the doctor-patient alliance. The decision on driving capability should be tailored to the individual patient and based on careful evaluation and informed judgement. In Norway, to qualify for a driver's license, a seizure-free interval of at least 12 months is currently required for group 1 drivers (passenger cars), whereas group 2 drivers (heavy motor vehicles, commercial driving) must have been seizure-free for at least 10 years and not have experienced epileptic seizures from the age of 18 years. Norwegian physicians are obliged to report patients with seizures to driving authorities, although this is an unpopular rule. In reviewing the available literature, it is apparent that despite there being relatively few sound studies, the risks of car accidents among persons with epilepsy may previously have been overestimated.

Preference for rizatriptan 10-mg wafer vs. eletriptan 40-mg tablet for acute treatment of migraine.

Preference is a composite, patient-oriented endpoint incorporating efficacy, tolerability, formulation, and convenience of medications. The objective of this study was to compare patient preference for rizatriptan 10-mg wafer vs. eletriptan 40-mg tablet for acute treatment of migraine. In this multicentre, open-label, two-period, crossover study, out-patients were randomly assigned to treat the first of two moderate to severe migraines with rizatriptan or eletriptan and the second with the alternate therapy. Patients completed diary assessments at baseline and up to 24 h after taking study medication. At the last visit, patients completed a psychometrically validated preference questionnaire. A total of 372 patients (mean age 38 years, 85% female) treated two migraine attacks, and 342 patients (92%) expressed a preference for treatment. Significantly more (P < or = 0.001) patients preferred rizatriptan 10-mg wafer [61.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 55.7, 66.3] to eletriptan 40-mg tablet (38.9%; 95% CI 33.7, 44.3). The most common reason given for preference of either treatment was speed of headache relief. At 2 h, 80% and 69% of patients reported that rizatriptan and eletriptan, respectively, was convenient or very convenient to take (mean convenience score 1.99 vs. 2.31, respectively; P < or = 0.001). Both triptans were well tolerated. In this head-to-head study designed to evaluate global patient preference, significantly more patients preferred the rizatriptan 10-mg wafer to the eletriptan 40-mg tablet for acute treatment of migraine. The single most important reason for preference was speed of relief, consistent with results from previous preference studies.

Acupuncture in intractable epilepsy: lack of effect on health-related quality of life.

The objective of this study was to assess the effect on health-related quality of life of acupuncture and sham acupuncture as adjunctive treatment in intractable epilepsy. We performed a randomized controlled trail with two parallel treatment arms at The National Center for Epilepsy in Norway, a comprehensive epilepsy center. Thirty-four patients with long-standing drug resistant epilepsy completed the study. The intervention consisted of 20 acupuncture treatments (bilateral needling of three acupoints plus one or two individually chosen points) or sham acupuncture (bilateral needling with smaller needles of three points outside the traditional meridians) over 8 weeks. The main outcome measures were changes in mean health-related quality of life scores for the two groups after 8 weeks, using the 89-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-89) questionnaire. We found no difference between the acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups in score changes in any dimension of the QOLIE-89 questionnaire, despite testing a large number of dimensions. We also found no change in QOLIE-89 scores between baseline and 8 weeks in either groups. In conclusion, we could not demonstrate a significant effect of traditional acupuncture or sham acupuncture on the health-related quality of life of patients with intractable epilepsy.

The effect of acupuncture in chronic intractable epilepsy.

We examined the effect of acupuncture on epileptic seizures in humans in a controlled clinical setting. Treatment was administered by two Chinese professors of acupuncture. Effect was measured by change in seizure frequency. Twenty-nine patients with chronic intractable epilepsy completed the study. They were randomized in two groups; 15 were given classical acupuncture and 14 were given sham acupuncture. There was a reduction in seizure frequency in both groups, which did not reach a level of statistical significance. There was also an increase in the number of seizure-free weeks in both groups, which reached a level of significance in the sham group. Thus, we have not been able to prove a beneficial effect of acupuncture in chronic intractable epilepsy.

Flunarizine versus metoprolol in migraine prophylaxis: a double-blind, randomized parallel group study of efficacy and tolerability.

The prophylactic effect of flunarizine and metoprolol was studied in a multi-center randomized, double-blind trial of 149 patients with migraine with or without aura. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomly allocated to treatment with flunarizine 10 mg daily or metoprolol 200 mg daily for 16 weeks (parallel group design). Both drugs reduced the number of migraine days per month by 37% (95% confidence interval 21-53%) compared with the placebo run-in period. All efficacy parameters were significantly reduced by both drugs and no significant difference was found between the two drugs at any time of the treatment period. However, calculation of the 95% confidence limits showed that each drug may have a superiority of more than 100% on a single main effect parameter. The most common adverse experiences were day-time sedation (both drugs) and weight gain (flunarizine). Depression was the most serious side-effect occurring in 8% on flunarizine and 3% on metoprolol. We conclude that both drugs are effective in the prevention of migraine attacks but a higher number of dropouts occurred on flunarizine because of depression or weight gain.